«

On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 22:06:10 -0400, ASAAR <> wrote:

>

More of ASSAAR's brainless comments deleted.

What I find hilarious is that you act like anyone would ever want to reply
directly to anything you might say or ask. As if anyone would willingly want to
help fill that useless void that exists inside of you. The only content that
exists in any of your comments is a bottomless desperation for attention.

Enough of my time wasted on this useless piece of ****. Back to something
productive and useful ...

Denis <> wrote:
>Can you get a compact as good as a SLR

No.

--
Ray Fischer

A.Neuman wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 12:27:49 +1200, frederick <> wrote:
>
>> A.Neuman wrote:
>>> On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 11:16:07 +1200, frederick <> wrote:
>>>
>>>> A.Neuman wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 00:34:55 +0200, Populares <> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Large repost but try to do a portrait with comapct.
>>>>> Thanks for this reply. It proves I am dealing with a moron who can't even read,
>>>>> much less comprehend what was just told to him. There's no sense in trying to
>>>>> have a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent, it just wouldn't be fair to
>>>>> either party.
>>>>>
>>>> You would do yourself a favour by reading some of the posts
>>> >from more experienced people posting to these forums, or
>>>> finding another source of reliable information and studying
>>>> it. You are 100% wrong.
>>> I refer you to this comment:
>>>
>>>> Don't let the prolific posters who are only trying to justify why they
>>>> wasted so much money on their dSLR systems try to fool you with
>>>> their red-herring run-arounds.
>>> If even 7 billion people are running like chickens with their heads cut off
>>> believing, doing, and telling others a foolish thing it REMAINS a foolish thing.
>>>
>>> It's nice to see how easily you are manipulated by them to join their mindless
>>> ranks.
>>
>> You do realise that such a strong belief that you are right
>> and everyone else is wrong is symptomatic of a mental disorder?
>> See a psychiatrist - but do it quick before scientologists
>> and others from tin hat brigades pounce on you.
>
> http://farm1.static.flickr.com/103/2...00e38976_o.jpg
>
> OH NO! Shallow DOF from an inexpensive P&S camera?!? EEEK!!! It must be broken!
> Quick! Get it repaired or the dSLR crowd will think you are insane!!
>
> frederick, you now go in the ****ed-up-moron-filter.
>
LOL.
You post a link to a downscaled pic where _everything_ is
blurry - including the parts that aren't supposed to be -
and that proves what?
That you're a third rate comedy act?

"frederick" <> wrote in message
news:1188096436.951599@ftpsrv1...
> A.Neuman wrote:
>> On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 12:27:49 +1200, frederick <> wrote:
>>
>>> A.Neuman wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 11:16:07 +1200, frederick <>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> A.Neuman wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 00:34:55 +0200, Populares
>>>>>> <> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Large repost but try to do a portrait with comapct.
>>>>>> Thanks for this reply. It proves I am dealing with a moron who
>>>>>> can't even read,
>>>>>> much less comprehend what was just told to him. There's no
>>>>>> sense in trying to
>>>>>> have a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent, it just
>>>>>> wouldn't be fair to
>>>>>> either party.
>>>>>>
>>>>> You would do yourself a favour by reading some of the posts from
>>>>> more experienced people posting to these forums, or finding
>>>>> another source of reliable information and studying it. You are
>>>>> 100% wrong.
>>>> I refer you to this comment:
>>>>
>>>>> Don't let the prolific posters who are only trying to justify
>>>>> why they
>>>>> wasted so much money on their dSLR systems try to fool you with
>>>>> their red-herring run-arounds.
>>>> If even 7 billion people are running like chickens with their
>>>> heads cut off
>>>> believing, doing, and telling others a foolish thing it REMAINS a
>>>> foolish thing.
>>>>
>>>> It's nice to see how easily you are manipulated by them to join
>>>> their mindless
>>>> ranks.
>>>
>>> You do realise that such a strong belief that you are right and
>>> everyone else is wrong is symptomatic of a mental disorder?
>>> See a psychiatrist - but do it quick before scientologists and
>>> others from tin hat brigades pounce on you.
>>
>> http://farm1.static.flickr.com/103/2...00e38976_o.jpg
>>
>> OH NO! Shallow DOF from an inexpensive P&S camera?!? EEEK!!! It
>> must be broken!
>> Quick! Get it repaired or the dSLR crowd will think you are
>> insane!!
>>
>> frederick, you now go in the ****ed-up-moron-filter.
>>
> LOL.
> You post a link to a downscaled pic where _everything_ is blurry -
> including the parts that aren't supposed to be - and that proves
> what?
> That you're a third rate comedy act?


No, it only proves that you are a total f'ing idiot, just like others
have already said. And that you know nothing about bird species, nor
how fast they are. That even at top shutter-speeds trying to capture
that particular species is a challenge while it's constantly foraging
for food on the swift run. I'd be amazed if anyone with their proud
zero-shutter-lag D-SLRs could even capture that species that clearly
while it was running, and that close up too.

Congratulations to the P&S camera owner for getting that shot. Very
impressive.

Ignore the idiots and morons, they're out in full-force lately.

Les Danesworth wrote:
> "frederick" <> wrote in message
> news:1188096436.951599@ftpsrv1...
>> A.Neuman wrote:
>>> On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 12:27:49 +1200, frederick <> wrote:
>>>
>>>> A.Neuman wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 11:16:07 +1200, frederick <>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> A.Neuman wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 00:34:55 +0200, Populares
>>>>>>> <> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Large repost but try to do a portrait with comapct.
>>>>>>> Thanks for this reply. It proves I am dealing with a moron who
>>>>>>> can't even read,
>>>>>>> much less comprehend what was just told to him. There's no
>>>>>>> sense in trying to
>>>>>>> have a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent, it just
>>>>>>> wouldn't be fair to
>>>>>>> either party.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> You would do yourself a favour by reading some of the posts from
>>>>>> more experienced people posting to these forums, or finding
>>>>>> another source of reliable information and studying it. You are
>>>>>> 100% wrong.
>>>>> I refer you to this comment:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Don't let the prolific posters who are only trying to justify
>>>>>> why they
>>>>>> wasted so much money on their dSLR systems try to fool you with
>>>>>> their red-herring run-arounds.
>>>>> If even 7 billion people are running like chickens with their
>>>>> heads cut off
>>>>> believing, doing, and telling others a foolish thing it REMAINS a
>>>>> foolish thing.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's nice to see how easily you are manipulated by them to join
>>>>> their mindless
>>>>> ranks.
>>>> You do realise that such a strong belief that you are right and
>>>> everyone else is wrong is symptomatic of a mental disorder?
>>>> See a psychiatrist - but do it quick before scientologists and
>>>> others from tin hat brigades pounce on you.
>>> http://farm1.static.flickr.com/103/2...00e38976_o.jpg
>>>
>>> OH NO! Shallow DOF from an inexpensive P&S camera?!? EEEK!!! It
>>> must be broken!
>>> Quick! Get it repaired or the dSLR crowd will think you are
>>> insane!!
>>>
>>> frederick, you now go in the ****ed-up-moron-filter.
>>>
>> LOL.
>> You post a link to a downscaled pic where _everything_ is blurry -
>> including the parts that aren't supposed to be - and that proves
>> what?
>> That you're a third rate comedy act?
>
>
> No, it only proves that you are a total f'ing idiot, just like others
> have already said. And that you know nothing about bird species, nor
> how fast they are. That even at top shutter-speeds trying to capture
> that particular species is a challenge while it's constantly foraging
> for food on the swift run. I'd be amazed if anyone with their proud
> zero-shutter-lag D-SLRs could even capture that species that clearly
> while it was running, and that close up too.
>
Numbskull.
A photo of a sandpiper running - congratulations to the OP.
But the photo is blurry, not very good, and doesn't show a
shallow DOF. A "keeper"? IMHO No.
>
> Congratulations to the P&S camera owner for getting that shot. Very
> impressive.
>
> Ignore the idiots and morons, they're out in full-force lately.
>
It seems so.

"frederick" <> wrote in message
news:1188101766.385384@ftpsrv1...
> Les Danesworth wrote:
>> "frederick" <> wrote in message
>> news:1188096436.951599@ftpsrv1...
>>> A.Neuman wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 12:27:49 +1200, frederick <>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> A.Neuman wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 11:16:07 +1200, frederick <>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A.Neuman wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 00:34:55 +0200, Populares
>>>>>>>> <> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Large repost but try to do a portrait with comapct.
>>>>>>>> Thanks for this reply. It proves I am dealing with a moron
>>>>>>>> who
>>>>>>>> can't even read,
>>>>>>>> much less comprehend what was just told to him. There's no
>>>>>>>> sense in trying to
>>>>>>>> have a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent, it just
>>>>>>>> wouldn't be fair to
>>>>>>>> either party.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You would do yourself a favour by reading some of the posts
>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>> more experienced people posting to these forums, or finding
>>>>>>> another source of reliable information and studying it. You
>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>> 100% wrong.
>>>>>> I refer you to this comment:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Don't let the prolific posters who are only trying to justify
>>>>>>> why they
>>>>>>> wasted so much money on their dSLR systems try to fool you
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> their red-herring run-arounds.
>>>>>> If even 7 billion people are running like chickens with their
>>>>>> heads cut off
>>>>>> believing, doing, and telling others a foolish thing it REMAINS
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> foolish thing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's nice to see how easily you are manipulated by them to join
>>>>>> their mindless
>>>>>> ranks.
>>>>> You do realise that such a strong belief that you are right and
>>>>> everyone else is wrong is symptomatic of a mental disorder?
>>>>> See a psychiatrist - but do it quick before scientologists and
>>>>> others from tin hat brigades pounce on you.
>>>> http://farm1.static.flickr.com/103/2...00e38976_o.jpg
>>>>
>>>> OH NO! Shallow DOF from an inexpensive P&S camera?!? EEEK!!! It
>>>> must be broken!
>>>> Quick! Get it repaired or the dSLR crowd will think you are
>>>> insane!!
>>>>
>>>> frederick, you now go in the ****ed-up-moron-filter.
>>>>
>>> LOL.
>>> You post a link to a downscaled pic where _everything_ is blurry -
>>> including the parts that aren't supposed to be - and that proves
>>> what?
>>> That you're a third rate comedy act?
>>
>>
>> No, it only proves that you are a total f'ing idiot, just like
>> others
>> have already said. And that you know nothing about bird species,
>> nor
>> how fast they are. That even at top shutter-speeds trying to
>> capture
>> that particular species is a challenge while it's constantly
>> foraging
>> for food on the swift run. I'd be amazed if anyone with their proud
>> zero-shutter-lag D-SLRs could even capture that species that
>> clearly
>> while it was running, and that close up too.
>>
> Numbskull.
> A photo of a sandpiper running - congratulations to the OP. But the
> photo is blurry, not very good, and doesn't show a shallow DOF. A
> "keeper"? IMHO No.
> >
>> Congratulations to the P&S camera owner for getting that shot. Very
>> impressive.
>>
>> Ignore the idiots and morons, they're out in full-force lately.
>>
> It seems so.

Twice you desire to prove that you're a total idiot. A "Sandpiper" it
is not.

In your case take some sage advice, but idiots rarely do, that's why
they remain idiots. "It is better to remain silent and thought to be a
fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt." Twice now you've
removed all doubt.

Keep that in mind for the next time you feel the urge to type on your
keyboard. This time it's much too late to do anything about it.

Do yourself another favor, zoom in on the pixels or put on your
glasses. I know you are an idiot, you've proven that multiple times,
but I'm not sure what your other physical problems are. No detail in
any digital image can be any finer than single pixels. There are
plenty of single-pixel details in that image. If you had any
intelligence at all you would also notice the severe jpg compression
used. The unfortunate side is that it appears to also have been
downsized using bicubic resampling as is found in PhotoShop, which
always severely blurs any diagonal edges in the process. Not very
observant are you. First you don't even know what bird it is then you
don't even know how to evaluate downsized jpg images. Tsk tsk. You
have much to learn, but I doubt that is even possible.

Now go slink back into whatever troll's-hole you crawled out of.

On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 06:16:19 GMT, "Les Danesworth"
<> wrote:

>
>"frederick" <> wrote in message
>news:1188101766.385384@ftpsrv1...
>> Les Danesworth wrote:
>>> "frederick" <> wrote in message
>>> news:1188096436.951599@ftpsrv1...
>>>> A.Neuman wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 12:27:49 +1200, frederick <>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> A.Neuman wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 11:16:07 +1200, frederick <>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A.Neuman wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 00:34:55 +0200, Populares
>>>>>>>>> <> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Large repost but try to do a portrait with comapct.
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for this reply. It proves I am dealing with a moron
>>>>>>>>> who
>>>>>>>>> can't even read,
>>>>>>>>> much less comprehend what was just told to him. There's no
>>>>>>>>> sense in trying to
>>>>>>>>> have a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent, it just
>>>>>>>>> wouldn't be fair to
>>>>>>>>> either party.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You would do yourself a favour by reading some of the posts
>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>> more experienced people posting to these forums, or finding
>>>>>>>> another source of reliable information and studying it. You
>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>> 100% wrong.
>>>>>>> I refer you to this comment:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Don't let the prolific posters who are only trying to justify
>>>>>>>> why they
>>>>>>>> wasted so much money on their dSLR systems try to fool you
>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>> their red-herring run-arounds.
>>>>>>> If even 7 billion people are running like chickens with their
>>>>>>> heads cut off
>>>>>>> believing, doing, and telling others a foolish thing it REMAINS
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> foolish thing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's nice to see how easily you are manipulated by them to join
>>>>>>> their mindless
>>>>>>> ranks.
>>>>>> You do realise that such a strong belief that you are right and
>>>>>> everyone else is wrong is symptomatic of a mental disorder?
>>>>>> See a psychiatrist - but do it quick before scientologists and
>>>>>> others from tin hat brigades pounce on you.
>>>>> http://farm1.static.flickr.com/103/2...00e38976_o.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>> OH NO! Shallow DOF from an inexpensive P&S camera?!? EEEK!!! It
>>>>> must be broken!
>>>>> Quick! Get it repaired or the dSLR crowd will think you are
>>>>> insane!!
>>>>>
>>>>> frederick, you now go in the ****ed-up-moron-filter.
>>>>>
>>>> LOL.
>>>> You post a link to a downscaled pic where _everything_ is blurry -
>>>> including the parts that aren't supposed to be - and that proves
>>>> what?
>>>> That you're a third rate comedy act?
>>>
>>>
>>> No, it only proves that you are a total f'ing idiot, just like
>>> others
>>> have already said. And that you know nothing about bird species,
>>> nor
>>> how fast they are. That even at top shutter-speeds trying to
>>> capture
>>> that particular species is a challenge while it's constantly
>>> foraging
>>> for food on the swift run. I'd be amazed if anyone with their proud
>>> zero-shutter-lag D-SLRs could even capture that species that
>>> clearly
>>> while it was running, and that close up too.
>>>
>> Numbskull.
>> A photo of a sandpiper running - congratulations to the OP. But the
>> photo is blurry, not very good, and doesn't show a shallow DOF. A
>> "keeper"? IMHO No.
>> >
>>> Congratulations to the P&S camera owner for getting that shot. Very
>>> impressive.
>>>
>>> Ignore the idiots and morons, they're out in full-force lately.
>>>
>> It seems so.
>
>Twice you desire to prove that you're a total idiot. A "Sandpiper" it
>is not.
>
>In your case take some sage advice, but idiots rarely do, that's why
>they remain idiots. "It is better to remain silent and thought to be a
>fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt." Twice now you've
>removed all doubt.
>
>Keep that in mind for the next time you feel the urge to type on your
>keyboard. This time it's much too late to do anything about it.
>
>Do yourself another favor, zoom in on the pixels or put on your
>glasses. I know you are an idiot, you've proven that multiple times,
>but I'm not sure what your other physical problems are. No detail in
>any digital image can be any finer than single pixels. There are
>plenty of single-pixel details in that image. If you had any
>intelligence at all you would also notice the severe jpg compression
>used. The unfortunate side is that it appears to also have been
>downsized using bicubic resampling as is found in PhotoShop, which
>always severely blurs any diagonal edges in the process. Not very
>observant are you. First you don't even know what bird it is then you
>don't even know how to evaluate downsized jpg images. Tsk tsk. You
>have much to learn, but I doubt that is even possible.
>
>Now go slink back into whatever troll's-hole you crawled out of.
>
>
>
>
>
>

you must be a mate of X man so that makes you a troll

On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 00:43:16 GMT, A.Neuman <> wrote:

>On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 12:27:49 +1200, frederick <> wrote:
>
>>A.Neuman wrote:
>>> On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 11:16:07 +1200, frederick <> wrote:
>>>
>>>> A.Neuman wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 00:34:55 +0200, Populares <> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Large repost but try to do a portrait with comapct.
>>>>> Thanks for this reply. It proves I am dealing with a moron who can't even read,
>>>>> much less comprehend what was just told to him. There's no sense in trying to
>>>>> have a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent, it just wouldn't be fair to
>>>>> either party.
>>>>>
>>>> You would do yourself a favour by reading some of the posts
>>>>from more experienced people posting to these forums, or
>>>> finding another source of reliable information and studying
>>>> it. You are 100% wrong.
>>>
>>> I refer you to this comment:
>>>
>>>> Don't let the prolific posters who are only trying to justify why they
>>>> wasted so much money on their dSLR systems try to fool you with
>>>> their red-herring run-arounds.
>>>
>>> If even 7 billion people are running like chickens with their heads cut off
>>> believing, doing, and telling others a foolish thing it REMAINS a foolish thing.
>>>
>>> It's nice to see how easily you are manipulated by them to join their mindless
>>> ranks.
>>
>>
>>You do realise that such a strong belief that you are right
>>and everyone else is wrong is symptomatic of a mental disorder?
>>See a psychiatrist - but do it quick before scientologists
>>and others from tin hat brigades pounce on you.
>
>http://farm1.static.flickr.com/103/2...00e38976_o.jpg
>
>OH NO! Shallow DOF from an inexpensive P&S camera?!? EEEK!!! It must be broken!
>Quick! Get it repaired or the dSLR crowd will think you are insane!!
>
>frederick, you now go in the ****ed-up-moron-filter.


Xman clone **** off

On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 01:12:15 GMT, A.Neuman <> wrote:

>On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 20:59:58 -0400, ASAAR <> wrote:
>
><desperate attention-seeking moronic drivel snipped>
>
>Just another one for the "useless & mindless club" asswipe-filter.

X man you are a sad little jealous pratt if you spent your time
looking for a proper job and earn some money you too would be able ot
afford a proper camera and you wouldnt have to resort to slagging off
DSLR. So bugger off and go play with your boot sale camera and
photoline 32

On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 02:31:38 GMT, Idiot Detector <>
wrote:

>On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 22:06:10 -0400, ASAAR <> wrote:
>
>>
>
>More of ASSAAR's brainless comments deleted.
>
>What I find hilarious is that you act like anyone would ever want to reply
>directly to anything you might say or ask. As if anyone would willingly want to
>help fill that useless void that exists inside of you. The only content that
>exists in any of your comments is a bottomless desperation for attention.
>
>Enough of my time wasted on this useless piece of ****. Back to something
>productive and useful ...


X man **** off