«

manenrapture <> wrote:

>Thank you very much.

Fix your clock.
--

hummingbird
http://www.dpchallenge.com/image.php?IMAGE_ID=562519

manenrapture <> wrote:

>Seriously,

Fix your clock.
--

hummingbird
http://www.dpchallenge.com/image.php?IMAGE_ID=562519

manenrapture wrote:
> "Mike Easter"
>> manenrapture wrote:
User-Agent: G2/1.0

>>> How to do mass mailing from MS Outlook or Outlook Express with the
>>> same message mailed directly to individual recipients in one attempt
>>> without showing the recipient who else has also been sent with the
>>> same mail without any entry in Cc or Bcc fields?

You said, paraphrasing, 'without any entry in (your mua's) BCC.' That
is stupid and demonstrates your lack of understanding.

>> It appears that you do not understand the function of your OL or OE's
>> BCC field.

> It is not that I don't know BBC implications.

The term is BCC and yes it is that you don't know BCC implications as
demonstrated by what you said and by what you keep saying.

>What I mean is
> sending mass mails in one attempt without having to write anything in
> CC or Bcc fields but still ensuring that each recipient sees only his/
> her address in the To field.

What I mean is -- that has been explained to you in about 7 or 9
different ways.

You are saying the same stupid and incomprehensible thing over and over
again.

> Got it?

Absolutely not. I'm wasting time talking to a googlegrouper who isn't
capable of reading what has been written and who isn't capable of
'restating' what he is trying to say in a more comprehensible fashion
and who then after numerous separate attempts to emphasize what they are
saying by saying the same thing over and again but saying it no better
has the audacity to say 'Got it?' when in fact it is the googlegrouper
who hasn't 'Got it' yet.



--
Mike Easter

<> wrote in message
news:...
> manenrapture wrote:
>
>>Seriously,
>
> Fix your clock.


His datestamps have an offset of -0000 (GMT). Yet his IP address
shows he is somewhere around India. Looks like he needs to set his
timezone.

Vanguard wrote:
> <>
>> manenrapture wrote:

User-Agent: G2/1.0
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 18:12:06 -0000
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 18:12:07 +0000 (UTC)

>> Fix your clock.

> His datestamps have an offset of -0000 (GMT). Yet his IP address
> shows he is somewhere around India. Looks like he needs to set his
> timezone.

It's a googlegrouper. All GG Date/NPH lines are stamped by the GG
interface because they are typing with a browser, not an nntp
newsreader. S/He can't 'fix' hir clock as regards the timestamps. You
can't see any evidence of maneurapture's computer's clock settings.

And to me, 'fix your clock' when said to someone who appears to be
stamping their Date line incorrectly because of an error in their
computer's time setting means the same thing/ includes/ 'set your
timezone' correctly -- because that is ususally what is wrong in those
Date/NPH discrepancies.

But not this time.

--
Mike Easter

"Mike Easter" wrote in message
news:...
>
> Vanguard wrote:
>>
>> <>
>>>
>>> manenrapture wrote:
>
> User-Agent: G2/1.0
> Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 18:12:06 -0000
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 18:12:07 +0000 (UTC)
>
>>> Fix your clock.
>
>> His datestamps have an offset of -0000 (GMT). Yet his IP address
>> shows he is somewhere around India. Looks like he needs to set his
>> timezone.
>
> It's a googlegrouper. All GG Date/NPH lines are stamped by the GG
> interface because they are typing with a browser, not an nntp
> newsreader. S/He can't 'fix' hir clock as regards the timestamps.
> You
> can't see any evidence of maneurapture's computer's clock settings.

And yet I see posts from other Google Groupers that *do* show an
offset, as in "Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:36:15 -0700". I didn't say
where the OP has to set his timezone. Since he is posting through
Google Groups, *that* is where he has to set his timezone. One of the
account settings is the user's timezone.

The OP should go to his Google Groups account, go to My Account, and
edit his Personal Information where he can then set his timezone. It
is an optional setting and probably why he didn't bother to configure
that setting after creating a Google account.

Vanguard wrote:
> "Mike Easter"

>> It's a googlegrouper. All GG Date/NPH lines are stamped by the GG
>> interface because they are typing with a browser, not an nntp
>> newsreader. S/He can't 'fix' hir clock as regards the timestamps.
>> You can't see any evidence of maneurapture's computer's clock
settings.
>
> And yet I see posts from other Google Groupers that *do* show an
> offset, as in "Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:36:15 -0700".

I think that some googlegroups servers are on the west coast, such as
google hq and such and stamp with the local timezone offset of the
google server.

> I didn't say
> where the OP has to set his timezone. Since he is posting through
> Google Groups, *that* is where he has to set his timezone. One of the
> account settings is the user's timezone.

I have posted to GG and I didn't do anything about setting a timezone.
My GG 'profile' is empty. It doesn't have a timezone.

> The OP should go to his Google Groups account, go to My Account, and
> edit his Personal Information where he can then set his timezone. It
> is an optional setting and probably why he didn't bother to configure
> that setting after creating a Google account.

You are correct that there is such a setting in My account, but I
seriously doubt if any/many GGers configure it.

If I were looking at a GGer Date/NPH lines, I would assume that it was
not configured and that the offset represented the offset of the GG
server.

--
Mike Easter

On Aug 27, 1:18 am, "Mike Easter" <Mi...@ster.invalid> wrote:
> manenrapture wrote:
> > "Mike Easter"
> >> manenrapture wrote:
>
> User-Agent: G2/1.0
>
> >>> How to do mass mailing from MS Outlook or Outlook Express with the
> >>> same message mailed directly to individual recipients in one attempt
> >>> without showing the recipient who else has also been sent with the
> >>> same mail without any entry in Cc or Bcc fields?
>
> You said, paraphrasing, 'without any entry in (your mua's) BCC.' That
> is stupid and demonstrates your lack of understanding.
>
> >> It appears that you do not understand the function of your OL or OE's
> >> BCC field.
> > It is not that I don't know BBC implications.
>
> The term is BCC and yes it is that you don't know BCC implications as
> demonstrated by what you said and by what you keep saying.
>
> >What I mean is
> > sending mass mails in one attempt without having to write anything in
> > CC or Bcc fields but still ensuring that each recipient sees only his/
> > her address in the To field.
>
> What I mean is -- that has been explained to you in about 7 or 9
> different ways.
>
> You are saying the same stupid and incomprehensible thing over and over
> again.
>
> > Got it?
>
> Absolutely not. I'm wasting time talking to a googlegrouper who isn't
> capable of reading what has been written and who isn't capable of
> 'restating' what he is trying to say in a more comprehensible fashion
> and who then after numerous separate attempts to emphasize what they are
> saying by saying the same thing over and again but saying it no better
> has the audacity to say 'Got it?' when in fact it is the googlegrouper
> who hasn't 'Got it' yet.
>
> --
> Mike Easter

You will realise that there is knowledge beyond what you know. What is
incomprehensible to you is not the same for who know. There has to be
a convincing answer to what I have asked. Your comments about my
capability to understand cannot block my quest to find an answer. If
you felt like wasting your precious time, why on earth did you post
your response in so many words? Thanks

sibananda mishra wrote:
> On Aug 27, 1:18 am, "Mike Easter" <Mi...@ster.invalid> wrote:
>> manenrapture wrote:
>>> "Mike Easter"
>>>> manenrapture wrote:
>> User-Agent: G2/1.0
>>
>>>>> How to do mass mailing from MS Outlook or Outlook Express with the
>>>>> same message mailed directly to individual recipients in one attempt
>>>>> without showing the recipient who else has also been sent with the
>>>>> same mail without any entry in Cc or Bcc fields?
>> You said, paraphrasing, 'without any entry in (your mua's) BCC.' That
>> is stupid and demonstrates your lack of understanding.
>>
>>>> It appears that you do not understand the function of your OL or OE's
>>>> BCC field.
>>> It is not that I don't know BBC implications.
>> The term is BCC and yes it is that you don't know BCC implications as
>> demonstrated by what you said and by what you keep saying.
>>
>>> What I mean is
>>> sending mass mails in one attempt without having to write anything in
>>> CC or Bcc fields but still ensuring that each recipient sees only his/
>>> her address in the To field.
>> What I mean is -- that has been explained to you in about 7 or 9
>> different ways.
>>
>> You are saying the same stupid and incomprehensible thing over and over
>> again.
>>
>>> Got it?
>> Absolutely not. I'm wasting time talking to a googlegrouper who isn't
>> capable of reading what has been written and who isn't capable of
>> 'restating' what he is trying to say in a more comprehensible fashion
>> and who then after numerous separate attempts to emphasize what they are
>> saying by saying the same thing over and again but saying it no better
>> has the audacity to say 'Got it?' when in fact it is the googlegrouper
>> who hasn't 'Got it' yet.
>>
>> --
>> Mike Easter
>
> You will realise that there is knowledge beyond what you know. What is
> incomprehensible to you is not the same for who know. There has to be
> a convincing answer to what I have asked. Your comments about my
> capability to understand cannot block my quest to find an answer. If
> you felt like wasting your precious time, why on earth did you post
> your response in so many words? Thanks
>

There is more than one answer but it's not Outlook or Outlook Express.
Two of them are out-and-out spamware packages.

manenrapture wrote:
>
> How to do mass mailing from MS Outlook or Outlook Express with the
> same message mailed directly to individual recipients in one attempt
> without showing the recipient who else has also been sent with the
> same mail without any entry in Cc or Bcc fields?
> Kind help is appreciated.

Use a third pary service. ie

http://www.ymlp.com/



--
http://www.bootdisk.com/