I'm sorry I answered your question. Damn googlegrouper I keep forgetting to
look.
--
Newsgroup Trolls. Read about mine here
http://www.pcbutts1.com/downloads
The list grows. Leythos the stalker
http://www.leythosthestalker.com, David
H. Lipman, Max M Wachtell III aka What's in a Name?, Fitz,
Rhonda Lea Kirk, Meat Plow, F Kwatu F, George Orwell
"Radium" <> wrote in message
news: oups.com...
> On Aug 24, 5:54 pm, "nobody >" <usenetharves...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> Only he could come up with a need for an
>> obsolete cable-tv converter.
>
> I used to often play my Nintendo when it was connected to channel 3.
> However, I was change the TV channel to 4. I could see the video of
> the game but it was fuzzy and covered in grains. The music of the game
> was absent, and instead was filled with frightening-yet-enjoyable
> tones [sounding like a buzzer, lawn mower, or electric shaver] along
> with a faint audio of what was being discussed on the channel 4 news.
> I would get so scared, yet I would enjoy it.
>
> I could only get this effect when I had the cable box. Without the box
> it does not work. The cable box also seemed to filter out most of the
> random noise while keeping the heterodyne-like qualities of the audio-
> disruptions. The TV build also matters. I still have the TV I used.
> It's a Mitsubishi CS-2655R. What I like about this TV is that it is
> extremely sensitive to weak signals. Most TVs will simply not play any
> audio when receiving these weak signals. Most TVs have a cut-off that
> is way above that of my CS-2655R. I've got 4 TV in my house including
> the CS-2655R. One of the other TVs is also Mitsubishi but is much
> newer -- I bought it in May of 2000. This TV does not receive the weak
> magnetic disruptions, my CS-2655R is able to capture. I wonder why all
> the other TVs have a stricter limit to the softest sound they can
> receive.
>