On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 06:06:36 -0700,
wrote:
>On Jul 17, 2:27 am, Whiskers <catwhee...@operamail.com> wrote:
>> On 2007-07-16, pawi...@yahoo.com <pawi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> > This must be a dumb question, but can anyone please tell me what
>> > OHP paper is ?
>>
>> > What is its composition ?
>>
>> Not paper. Traditionally, "acetate" which is preferred for its flatness,
>> clarity, and neutral colour. I daresay other substances might be used too;
>> you'd have to inspect the packaging in the shop or contact various
>> suppliers or makers to get the specification of different products.
>>
>> > What are its heat resisting properties compared to cellophane,
>> > paper, etc. ?
<snip>
>> Some types have peel-off opaque or translucent backing, possibly marked
>> with lines or a grid to assist layout. The pacakaging should include
>> instructions for use and handling to get best results for the purpose the
>> stuff is sold for. 'Non stick' would seem to conflict with the need for
>> it to retain what you draw or print on it.
>>
>
>Thanks, that's the kind of reply I hoped for. Not like those that
>treat my post as if I was asking for classified information that
>was meant to be dispensed sparingly on a need-to-know basis.
>
>My reason for asking was as follows (I just didn't think I'd need
>to post it to ask what I thought were straightforward questions):
How? You didn't ask what you really wanted until this post. You skipped
over the real question.
>Someone asked in a forum how to make PCBs, and someone else
>claimed that he uses OHP paper as an iron-on medium to transfer
>the copper track design on to the raw copper-clad board.
Then a whole lot of the question seems pointless. A more direct answer
could have been more forthcoming if you mentioned the really simple
request at the beginning. Your 1st post could have just mentioned OHP
film, PCBs. Only a paragraph was required.
Used OHP film for years, but always UV etching, never used any iron-on
method.
<snip>
Not knowing the source of the info, have you (a more pointed response
since you now mention the real topic) -
These newsgroups,
All groups > USENET > sci . electronics clear
Usenet 1 - 9 of 9
sci.electronics
sci.electronics.basic
sci.electronics.basics
sci.electronics.cad
sci.electronics.components.* (1)
sci.electronics.design
sci.electronics.equipment.* (1)
sci.electronics.misc.* (1)
sci.electronics.repair.* (1)
>Another reason for framing my questions as I did is that I like
>to collect as much info as possible on any topic I'm interested
>in, including extraneous tidbits that may not be immediately
>relevant. Such pieces of info have often proved to be very useful
>later.
Then expect the generic answers you got. Ask a more direct question and
use the info to then do your own research for higher level of detail.
Me