Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Windows 64bit > Highly unofficial NVidia 168.18 whql

Reply
Thread Tools

Highly unofficial NVidia 168.18 whql

 
 
=?Utf-8?B?Q2FybG9z?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-12-2007
The french guys of www.station-drivers.com did it again.
They have unofficial (allegedly whql) drivers v168.18 for both Vista and XP
x64.
http://www.station-drivers.com/page/...0forceware.htm
http://www.station-drivers.com/telec...ivers.com).exe
http://www.station-drivers.com/telec...ivers.com).exe
Downloading them right now.
Use it at your own risk (or just don't use it).
Carlos
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
=?Utf-8?B?Q2FybG9z?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-12-2007
Sorry, 162.18!
Carlos

"Carlos" wrote:

> The french guys of www.station-drivers.com did it again.
> They have unofficial (allegedly whql) drivers v168.18 for both Vista and XP
> x64.
> http://www.station-drivers.com/page/...0forceware.htm
> http://www.station-drivers.com/telec...ivers.com).exe
> http://www.station-drivers.com/telec...ivers.com).exe
> Downloading them right now.
> Use it at your own risk (or just don't use it).
> Carlos

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
jabloomf1230
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-13-2007
Carlos,

They also have 162.22 for Vista x86 and Vista x64, which is slightly
newer. Guru3d has 163.11 for Vista x86 and Vista x64, but these drivers
only work with the NVidia 8xxx series cards.

Jay

Carlos wrote:
> The french guys of www.station-drivers.com did it again.
> They have unofficial (allegedly whql) drivers v168.18 for both Vista and XP
> x64.
> http://www.station-drivers.com/page/...0forceware.htm
> http://www.station-drivers.com/telec...ivers.com).exe
> http://www.station-drivers.com/telec...ivers.com).exe
> Downloading them right now.
> Use it at your own risk (or just don't use it).
> Carlos

 
Reply With Quote
 
Dominic Payer
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-13-2007
162.18 for XP/2000 x86 and 162.22 for Vista x86 and x64 are official nVidia
beta drivers.

See http://www.nzone.com/object/nzone_do...etadriver.html




"Carlos" <> wrote in message
news:6DAE8BDA-FA74-4BD3-99D8-...
> The french guys of www.station-drivers.com did it again.
> They have unofficial (allegedly whql) drivers v168.18 for both Vista and
> XP
> x64.
> http://www.station-drivers.com/page/...0forceware.htm
> http://www.station-drivers.com/telec...ivers.com).exe
> http://www.station-drivers.com/telec...ivers.com).exe
> Downloading them right now.
> Use it at your own risk (or just don't use it).
> Carlos


 
Reply With Quote
 
=?Utf-8?B?Q2FybG9z?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-13-2007
Guys:
Let me stress this.
These are NOT beta.
They are whql.
Once you extract the exe file you will be able to see the "catalog" file
(*cat.) which is the "mark" of being whql.
They have the same numbering of other betas around there but they are not
beta.
Then again, use at your own risk.
I have not still decided what I am going to do with them.
Carlos

"Dominic Payer" wrote:

> 162.18 for XP/2000 x86 and 162.22 for Vista x86 and x64 are official nVidia
> beta drivers.
>
> See http://www.nzone.com/object/nzone_do...etadriver.html
>
>
>
>
> "Carlos" <> wrote in message
> news:6DAE8BDA-FA74-4BD3-99D8-...
> > The french guys of www.station-drivers.com did it again.
> > They have unofficial (allegedly whql) drivers v168.18 for both Vista and
> > XP
> > x64.
> > http://www.station-drivers.com/page/...0forceware.htm
> > http://www.station-drivers.com/telec...ivers.com).exe
> > http://www.station-drivers.com/telec...ivers.com).exe
> > Downloading them right now.
> > Use it at your own risk (or just don't use it).
> > Carlos

>

 
Reply With Quote
 
Kue2
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-13-2007
Hi Guys
The 162.22 version is for Nvidia series 6,7,8 series cards
I have this version loaded in Vista 64.
So far so good,no errors.Time will be the big test.


"Carlos" <> wrote in message
news:12BF90ED-9734-4A2A-9A80-...
> Guys:
> Let me stress this.
> These are NOT beta.
> They are whql.
> Once you extract the exe file you will be able to see the "catalog" file
> (*cat.) which is the "mark" of being whql.
> They have the same numbering of other betas around there but they are not
> beta.
> Then again, use at your own risk.
> I have not still decided what I am going to do with them.
> Carlos
>
> "Dominic Payer" wrote:
>
>> 162.18 for XP/2000 x86 and 162.22 for Vista x86 and x64 are official
>> nVidia
>> beta drivers.
>>
>> See http://www.nzone.com/object/nzone_do...etadriver.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Carlos" <> wrote in message
>> news:6DAE8BDA-FA74-4BD3-99D8-...
>> > The french guys of www.station-drivers.com did it again.
>> > They have unofficial (allegedly whql) drivers v168.18 for both Vista
>> > and
>> > XP
>> > x64.
>> > http://www.station-drivers.com/page/...0forceware.htm
>> > http://www.station-drivers.com/telec...ivers.com).exe
>> > http://www.station-drivers.com/telec...ivers.com).exe
>> > Downloading them right now.
>> > Use it at your own risk (or just don't use it).
>> > Carlos

>>


 
Reply With Quote
 
John Barnes
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-13-2007
Thanks. I downloaded them from the nVidia site but have not installed yet.

"Kue2" <> wrote in message
news:0C8DE412-506E-42C5-9512-...
> Hi Guys
> The 162.22 version is for Nvidia series 6,7,8 series cards
> I have this version loaded in Vista 64.
> So far so good,no errors.Time will be the big test.
>
>
> "Carlos" <> wrote in message
> news:12BF90ED-9734-4A2A-9A80-...
>> Guys:
>> Let me stress this.
>> These are NOT beta.
>> They are whql.
>> Once you extract the exe file you will be able to see the "catalog" file
>> (*cat.) which is the "mark" of being whql.
>> They have the same numbering of other betas around there but they are not
>> beta.
>> Then again, use at your own risk.
>> I have not still decided what I am going to do with them.
>> Carlos
>>
>> "Dominic Payer" wrote:
>>
>>> 162.18 for XP/2000 x86 and 162.22 for Vista x86 and x64 are official
>>> nVidia
>>> beta drivers.
>>>
>>> See http://www.nzone.com/object/nzone_do...etadriver.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Carlos" <> wrote in message
>>> news:6DAE8BDA-FA74-4BD3-99D8-...
>>> > The french guys of www.station-drivers.com did it again.
>>> > They have unofficial (allegedly whql) drivers v168.18 for both Vista
>>> > and
>>> > XP
>>> > x64.
>>> > http://www.station-drivers.com/page/...0forceware.htm
>>> > http://www.station-drivers.com/telec...ivers.com).exe
>>> > http://www.station-drivers.com/telec...ivers.com).exe
>>> > Downloading them right now.
>>> > Use it at your own risk (or just don't use it).
>>> > Carlos
>>>

>


 
Reply With Quote
 
Kue2
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-13-2007
Well so much for that test(162.22).I still get the error (nvlddmkm.sys
error)system has recovered. Back to the original driver that does not
produce that error. Nvidia Driver version 7.15.10 9746 dated 22/08/2006.


"Kue2" <> wrote in message
news:0C8DE412-506E-42C5-9512-...
> Hi Guys
> The 162.22 version is for Nvidia series 6,7,8 series cards
> I have this version loaded in Vista 64.
> So far so good,no errors.Time will be the big test.
>
>
> "Carlos" <> wrote in message
> news:12BF90ED-9734-4A2A-9A80-...
>> Guys:
>> Let me stress this.
>> These are NOT beta.
>> They are whql.
>> Once you extract the exe file you will be able to see the "catalog" file
>> (*cat.) which is the "mark" of being whql.
>> They have the same numbering of other betas around there but they are not
>> beta.
>> Then again, use at your own risk.
>> I have not still decided what I am going to do with them.
>> Carlos
>>
>> "Dominic Payer" wrote:
>>
>>> 162.18 for XP/2000 x86 and 162.22 for Vista x86 and x64 are official
>>> nVidia
>>> beta drivers.
>>>
>>> See http://www.nzone.com/object/nzone_do...etadriver.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Carlos" <> wrote in message
>>> news:6DAE8BDA-FA74-4BD3-99D8-...
>>> > The french guys of www.station-drivers.com did it again.
>>> > They have unofficial (allegedly whql) drivers v168.18 for both Vista
>>> > and
>>> > XP
>>> > x64.
>>> > http://www.station-drivers.com/page/...0forceware.htm
>>> > http://www.station-drivers.com/telec...ivers.com).exe
>>> > http://www.station-drivers.com/telec...ivers.com).exe
>>> > Downloading them right now.
>>> > Use it at your own risk (or just don't use it).
>>> > Carlos
>>>

>


 
Reply With Quote
 
=?Utf-8?B?Q2FybG9z?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-14-2007
Hi:
Finally downloaded and successfully installed in Vista x64 the 162.18's from
the source mentioned at the top of my post.
I can confirm (and so does Vista) that the drivers are not beta.
They are digitally signed.
Date is June 29th, and version is 7.15.11.6218
No problems so far.
Carlos

"Kue2" wrote:

> Well so much for that test(162.22).I still get the error (nvlddmkm.sys
> error)system has recovered. Back to the original driver that does not
> produce that error. Nvidia Driver version 7.15.10 9746 dated 22/08/2006.
>
>
> "Kue2" <> wrote in message
> news:0C8DE412-506E-42C5-9512-...
> > Hi Guys
> > The 162.22 version is for Nvidia series 6,7,8 series cards
> > I have this version loaded in Vista 64.
> > So far so good,no errors.Time will be the big test.
> >
> >
> > "Carlos" <> wrote in message
> > news:12BF90ED-9734-4A2A-9A80-...
> >> Guys:
> >> Let me stress this.
> >> These are NOT beta.
> >> They are whql.
> >> Once you extract the exe file you will be able to see the "catalog" file
> >> (*cat.) which is the "mark" of being whql.
> >> They have the same numbering of other betas around there but they are not
> >> beta.
> >> Then again, use at your own risk.
> >> I have not still decided what I am going to do with them.
> >> Carlos
> >>
> >> "Dominic Payer" wrote:
> >>
> >>> 162.18 for XP/2000 x86 and 162.22 for Vista x86 and x64 are official
> >>> nVidia
> >>> beta drivers.
> >>>
> >>> See http://www.nzone.com/object/nzone_do...etadriver.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> "Carlos" <> wrote in message
> >>> news:6DAE8BDA-FA74-4BD3-99D8-...
> >>> > The french guys of www.station-drivers.com did it again.
> >>> > They have unofficial (allegedly whql) drivers v168.18 for both Vista
> >>> > and
> >>> > XP
> >>> > x64.
> >>> > http://www.station-drivers.com/page/...0forceware.htm
> >>> > http://www.station-drivers.com/telec...ivers.com).exe
> >>> > http://www.station-drivers.com/telec...ivers.com).exe
> >>> > Downloading them right now.
> >>> > Use it at your own risk (or just don't use it).
> >>> > Carlos
> >>>

> >

>

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dpreview's reviews "Highly Recommended" is highly questionable RichA Digital Photography 32 08-18-2009 09:45 AM
Unofficial ATI 7.7's whql =?Utf-8?B?Q2FybG9z?= Windows 64bit 0 07-18-2007 10:56 PM
NVidia 160.04's whql Vista x64, unofficial =?Utf-8?B?Q2FybG9z?= Windows 64bit 4 06-15-2007 10:42 AM
New unofficial ATI Catalyst 5.11 drivers whql =?Utf-8?B?Q2FybG9z?= Windows 64bit 3 01-01-2006 05:52 AM
NVidia Geforce 81.94 official whql are out =?Utf-8?B?Q2FybG9z?= Windows 64bit 4 11-15-2005 09:31 AM



Advertisments
 



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57