Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Computer Support > Re: Symantec NIS and tampered MBR/Boot Sector

Reply
Thread Tools

Re: Symantec NIS and tampered MBR/Boot Sector

 
 
Nomen Nescio
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-19-2007

"Ar Q" <> wrote in message news:SrPdi.1460$ nk.net...
> My friend's harddrive/computer became kind of slow lately. She wanted me to
> found out if it is software issue or hardware malfunction. So I took her
> hard drive and hooked it to my computer (copy my hd image to her hd first).
> As some of you know, I have maximized my Norton Internet Security
> activations, so I immediately delete the NIS program. Then I run some
> diagnosis and play some popular video games. Her hard drive looks pretty
> good to me. I returned it to her and told her the problem is more like
> software issue.
>
> But now she only got blue screen using that hd. Taking it back to my place,
> the hd works fine again. I did some research on this issue and found some
> articles from Internet. Apparently, Symantec's activation technology is to
> write some data to MBR/Boot sector to track the number of activations having
> done and which may cause tampered hard drives inaccessible once the maximum
> number is reached. But the articles I read don't have information on how to
> reverse the effect. Will any of you knowing this matter point me to some web
> pages? (I just want to put her MBR/Boot Sector back to as it was, not
> reducing the activation count on her hard drive since she doesn't use NIS.)
> Thanks.
>
> (And now I officially hate Symantec.All I want to do is to impress the girl
> and instead it makes me look bad. All the craps on activation just make the
> paid customers miserable.)
>
> Ar Q



Most anti-virus companies take undocumented steps to thwart piracy.

Some of them (like the one you just described) can be downright data-dangerous and deserve a flame, but someone somewhere will always bitch about even the most benign protection.

Right now I'm ****ing myself with laughter at the childish complaints of a moaning cuntflap who's bitching on Wilders Security Forums because Eset won't let him set up a private (i.e. PIRATE) update sever on the web.

The fact that anti-virus updates are copyrighted intellectual property and companies can do whatever the **** they like with them must have escaped his pea-sized brain.

No matter what self-serving explanations this dolt proposes, it's an undeniable fact that there is no legitimate reason for setting up your own OPEN www server to update NOD32 or any other anti-virus program.

If I was Eset I'd cancel the ****wit's licence and tell him to use Norton.

A swift kick in the scrotum is too good for some people.

(Sorry, I can't help you with the Norton ****-up.)






 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ANN] ruby-nis library packaged as gem 'nis' 0.1.1.1 Mike Dalessio Ruby 0 10-07-2010 08:27 PM
To implement amechanism for identifying the digitally signed mail is tampered or not. amitgupta4all Java 0 01-12-2010 08:05 AM
DJ tampered equipment stops working... Jonathan Walker NZ Computing 8 09-17-2007 06:28 AM
Symantec NIS and tampered MBR/Boot Sector Ar Q Computer Support 12 06-21-2007 04:16 AM
Tampered with create Network - Now Wireless signal on but no Inter =?Utf-8?B?U2VhbiBmcm9tIHRoZSBTdW5zaGluZSBDb2FzdA==?= Wireless Networking 6 05-11-2007 04:25 AM



Advertisments
 



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57