Velocity Reviews > Does Power Supply consume watts all the time?

# Does Power Supply consume watts all the time?

dwkerschen@gmail.com
Guest
Posts: n/a

 06-14-2007
Does Power Supply consume watts all the time?

I am having a PC built for me (middle of the road... just do not want
bloat-ware) and I have a choice of how big a power supply I can
select.

I do not want to waste energy with a bigger PS (I leave my PC on/in
sleep 24x7) if it just sits there and consumes 500 watts when I know
that a smaller one would be fine.

Thx
Dave-in-Denver

Paul
Guest
Posts: n/a

 06-14-2007
http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/(E-Mail Removed) wrote:
> Does Power Supply consume watts all the time?
>
> I am having a PC built for me (middle of the road... just do not want
> bloat-ware) and I have a choice of how big a power supply I can
> select.
>
> I do not want to waste energy with a bigger PS (I leave my PC on/in
> sleep 24x7) if it just sits there and consumes 500 watts when I know
> that a smaller one would be fine.
>
> Thx
> Dave-in-Denver
>

The power supply has a number printed on the side. Say it is "500W".

The 500W is the maximum amount of power that can be drawn from
the DC outputs.

For an average build, when the computer is sitting there, it might
draw 100W - 150W. It doesn't matter whether a 500W supply is used,
or a 750W supply is used, 100W to 150W is what is coming from the
wall.

When you start a game, and you have some fancy video cards, the power
drawn would increase to maybe 300W. So gaming adds more to your
power bill, than when the computer is just sitting there. Again,
it is the load the components make, that draws the power. The
500W number is the maximum output.

When you put the computer to sleep (S3 Suspend to RAM), the +5VSB
output continues to run. On my computer, it uses +5VSB at 0.40 amps
or about 2 watts. Some computers will draw more. The power is used
to maintain DRAM refresh, so the DRAM keeps all the memory cells
charged with their 1's and 0's, by using some +5VSB as a power
source.

Another issue, is the efficiency of the supply.

Say the computer is sitting there idle. Say the outputs are providing
exactly 100W. To just make up some numbers, 12V @ 5A, 5V @ 4A, 3.3V @ 6A.
Those are the DC outputs. The power comes from the A.C. wall plug.
The power supply has a "conversion efficiency", and that is how
good a job it does of turning the A.C. at 120 or 240V, into DC.

A cheap supply might be rated for 68% efficiency. To make 100 watts,
it needs 100W/0.68 = 147W from the A.C. wall plug. The 47W difference,
is waste heat. 147W comes from the power company. 100W goes to the
motherboard. 47W goes into the room as heat.

There are more expensive supplies, that are 80% or even higher
efficiency. Using the same 100W output load from the motherboard,
the wall power is 100W / 0.80 = 125W. Notice how the more efficient
supply, uses 22W less A.C., and if you feel the exhaust air coming
from the more efficient supply, it is cooler. They might even be
able to reduce the fan speed, use lighter heatsinks, and so on,
inside the PSU.

It takes a long time, to pay back that 22W saving. If my power is
\$0.07 per kilowatt hour, after 45 hours I would save a kilowatt hour
of electricity. Which means I'm saving \$0.07 about every two days, or
about \$12.78 per year. If the power supply is \$70 more than a less
efficient model, it will take 5.5 years to pay back the cost of
the more efficient supply, via the power saved.

That is not the main reason for doing it. The main reason, is
your computer room won't warm up quite as much, with a more
efficient supply. I guess it all depends on when you can run
air conditioning, as to how much of a factor this is.

Paul

dwkerschen@gmail.com
Guest
Posts: n/a

 06-14-2007
>
> The power supply has a number printed on the side. Say it is "500W".
>
> The 500W is the maximum amount of power that can be drawn from
> the DC outputs.
>
> For an average build, when the computer is sitting there, it might
> draw 100W - 150W. It doesn't matter whether a 500W supply is used,
> or a 750W supply is used, 100W to 150W is what is coming from the
> wall.
>
> When you start a game, and you have some fancy video cards, the power
> drawn would increase to maybe 300W. So gaming adds more to your
> power bill, than when the computer is just sitting there. Again,
> it is the load the components make, that draws the power. The
> 500W number is the maximum output.
>
> When you put the computer to sleep (S3 Suspend to RAM), the +5VSB
> output continues to run. On my computer, it uses +5VSB at 0.40 amps
> or about 2 watts. Some computers will draw more. The power is used
> to maintain DRAM refresh, so the DRAM keeps all the memory cells
> charged with their 1's and 0's, by using some +5VSB as a power
> source.
>
> Another issue, is the efficiency of the supply.
>
> Say the computer is sitting there idle. Say the outputs are providing
> exactly 100W. To just make up some numbers, 12V @ 5A, 5V @ 4A, 3.3V @ 6A.
> Those are the DC outputs. The power comes from the A.C. wall plug.
> The power supply has a "conversion efficiency", and that is how
> good a job it does of turning the A.C. at 120 or 240V, into DC.
>
> A cheap supply might be rated for 68% efficiency. To make 100 watts,
> it needs 100W/0.68 = 147W from the A.C. wall plug. The 47W difference,
> is waste heat. 147W comes from the power company. 100W goes to the
> motherboard. 47W goes into the room as heat.
>
> There are more expensive supplies, that are 80% or even higher
> efficiency. Using the same 100W output load from the motherboard,
> the wall power is 100W / 0.80 = 125W. Notice how the more efficient
> supply, uses 22W less A.C., and if you feel the exhaust air coming
> from the more efficient supply, it is cooler. They might even be
> able to reduce the fan speed, use lighter heatsinks, and so on,
> inside the PSU.
>
> It takes a long time, to pay back that 22W saving. If my power is
> \$0.07 per kilowatt hour, after 45 hours I would save a kilowatt hour
> of electricity. Which means I'm saving \$0.07 about every two days, or
> about \$12.78 per year. If the power supply is \$70 more than a less
> efficient model, it will take 5.5 years to pay back the cost of
> the more efficient supply, via the power saved.
>
> That is not the main reason for doing it. The main reason, is
> your computer room won't warm up quite as much, with a more
> efficient supply. I guess it all depends on when you can run
> air conditioning, as to how much of a factor this is.
>
> Paul

Holy Cow!!!

Man... do I love communicating with people who are clear and know what

Thank you Paul!!!

Dave-in-Denver