On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 10:24:17 +0100, tony sayer <>
wrote:
>In article <_bI7i.9735$>, nsag
><> writes
>>I am a long term AMD fan.
>>I have almost all AMD desktops. My AMD dual core ubermachine blazes through
>>large Photoshop files fast enough for now.
>>If I were building a new system for personal use right now I would not even
>>consider AMD.
>>Intel clearly leapfrogged AMD with the Core Dual CPU: these clearly
>>outperform AMD chips at comparable price points.
>>MOBOs for general, as opposed to high end 3d gaming, use all perform about
>>the same. If you are not a gamer mobos with the current intel chipset are
>>fine. If you want the best performance NVidia based SLI boards are better
>>performers if you are considering dual video cards. Brand is not as big an
>>issue as it is made out to be as long as you avoid the lowest price no name
>>mobo.
>
>
>>Before buying/building a new computer I am waiting to see if mobos will soon
>>be vended that have enough flash memory to hold the entire OS. This will
>>raise performance to previously unseen levels.
>>
>>
>>
>Now that would be an excellent idea!, As would lower power consumption
>and heat
Fraid I'm not as much of a big gamer anymore. Mainly use for internet,
music software like Cubase, office applications, a bit of Flight Sim,
DV Capture and editing and photo storage.
I wouldn't need the absolute best cpu or mobo that money can buy. What
I'm mainly looking for is something decent with good value and
compatibility. I'd probably only spend around £100 ($200 in USD) + or
- 20% for a CPU and maybe £80 ($160 in USD) + or - 25% on a Mobo.
John