On May 11, 8:37 pm, linguafr <b...@lfnetworking.com> wrote:
> 1. access switchports are for end users, i.e. hosts
> 2. the uplink between the two switches should be a trunk port with
> both vlans allowed - if you don't specify they're all allowed
> 3. you need to have a layer 3 interface for each vlan which will be
> the default gateways for the respective vlans. you can use a vlan int
> on the switches or another routing device as the default gateways.
I think what I am trying to do is not clear.
I have one VLAN with two networks configured VLAN 145 10.0.0.0/23 and
192.168.55.0/23
I am trying to seperate the networks into two seperate VLANs.
VLAN 145 10.0.0.0/23
VLAN 805 192.168.55.0/23
Instead of of having to go out and change 80+ devices at one time I am
creating the new vlan 805 adding the vlan interface address of
192.168.55.1/23 and removing it form vlan 145. Then using a cross
connect between one switchport on vlan 145 and one on vlan 805 I am
connecting the two vlans. This should allow devices on vlan 145 in
the address range of 192.168.55.0/23 to connect to the routed
interface vlan 192.168.55.1 configured on vlan 805.
Trunking the link keeps the vlans seperate. Cisco VLANs also maintain
a seprate mac-address table for each VLAN. There shouldn't be a
problem here either.
Switchport access vlans are untagged therefore traffic from vlan 145
should mix with vlan 805. Broadcasts should propogate and traffic
should pass unhindered. Both ports should work as a switch port.
Learn mac-addresses on either side and send traffic when appropriate.
Both Cisco's are running IOS. The 6506 has Version 12.2(1

SXE5 and
the 3750 has Version 12.2(25r)SEB1.
Perhaps something proprietary with Cisco IOS is causing the problem?