![]() |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
I've got my Spansion model (29jl032h3) sort of working, but I don't
think I've got the timing working correctly. The data o/p is becoming valid ony 5 nd after setting address etc, whereas it should be around 100 ns access time. I've set the generic TimingModel to be "S29JL032H55TFI323", but this is obviously not working. The model is working wrt things like unlock/programme/lock etc and I am getting the correct data out of my sim as set in the MIF files,, it's just the access time that seems to be wrong. Can anyone help please? Regards, Kev Parsons. Niv |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
On 18 Apr, 11:41, Niv <kev.pars...@mbda.co.uk> wrote:
> I've got my Spansion model (29jl032h3) sort of working, but I don't > think I've got the timing working correctly. The data o/p is becoming > valid ony 5 nd after setting address etc, whereas it should be around > 100 ns access time. > > I've set the generic TimingModel to be "S29JL032H55TFI323", but this > is obviously not working. > > The model is working wrt things like unlock/programme/lock etc and I > am getting the correct data out of my sim as set in the MIF files,, > it's just the access time that seems to be wrong. > > Can anyone help please? > > Regards, Kev Parsons. I've now edited the "gen_utils" package so that the CONSTANT UnitDelay01 : VitalDelayType01 is set to (100 ns, 100ns) and not (1 ns, 1 ns). This seems to delay the data o/p to teh required 100ns after address setup, so we can simulate as required. However, I'm sure there's a better way, if only I knew how! TIA, Kev P. Niv |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Kev,
Try running with SDF backannotation. To do this, you need to create an SDF file. Either use the FMF mk_sdf utility or cut and paste the data from the ..ftm file. That will get you the correct timing for the speed grade you choose. Rick Niv wrote: > On 18 Apr, 11:41, Niv <kev.pars...@mbda.co.uk> wrote: >> I've got my Spansion model (29jl032h3) sort of working, but I don't >> think I've got the timing working correctly. The data o/p is becoming >> valid ony 5 nd after setting address etc, whereas it should be around >> 100 ns access time. >> >> I've set the generic TimingModel to be "S29JL032H55TFI323", but this >> is obviously not working. >> >> The model is working wrt things like unlock/programme/lock etc and I >> am getting the correct data out of my sim as set in the MIF files,, >> it's just the access time that seems to be wrong. >> >> Can anyone help please? >> >> Regards, Kev Parsons. > > I've now edited the "gen_utils" package so that the CONSTANT > UnitDelay01 : VitalDelayType01 is set to (100 ns, 100ns) and not (1 > ns, 1 ns). > > This seems to delay the data o/p to teh required 100ns after address > setup, so we can simulate as required. > > However, I'm sure there's a better way, if only I knew how! > > TIA, Kev P. > FMF |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
On 23 Apr, 16:01, FMF <fmfoun...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Kev, > > Try running with SDF backannotation. To do this, you need to create an SDF > file. Either use the FMF mk_sdf utility or cut and paste the data from the > .ftm file. That will get you the correct timing for the speed grade you choose. > > Rick > > > > Niv wrote: > > On 18 Apr, 11:41, Niv <kev.pars...@mbda.co.uk> wrote: > >> I've got my Spansion model (29jl032h3) sort of working, but I don't > >> think I've got the timing working correctly. The data o/p is becoming > >> valid ony 5 nd after setting address etc, whereas it should be around > >> 100 ns access time. > > >> I've set the generic TimingModel to be "S29JL032H55TFI323", but this > >> is obviously not working. > > >> The model is working wrt things like unlock/programme/lock etc and I > >> am getting the correct data out of my sim as set in the MIF files,, > >> it's just the access time that seems to be wrong. > > >> Can anyone help please? > > >> Regards, Kev Parsons. > > > I've now edited the "gen_utils" package so that the CONSTANT > > UnitDelay01 : VitalDelayType01 is set to (100 ns, 100ns) and not (1 > > ns, 1 ns). > > > This seems to delay the data o/p to teh required 100ns after address > > setup, so we can simulate as required. > > > However, I'm sure there's a better way, if only I knew how! > > > TIA, Kev P.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Can you please supply more details on how to do this exactly please. I seem to have a batch file & perl script that don't generate anything. I'm sure it's dead simple, but I can't seem to see the wood for the trees. TIA, Niv. Niv |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| model question | Prasanth.lj | MCITP | 0 | 06-25-2007 09:52 AM |
| Rental Subscription Model Fails To Spread | Black Locust | DVD Video | 0 | 09-18-2005 09:13 AM |
| Can't find Motherboard model on PCB! | A+ Certification | 5 | 08-06-2004 07:33 AM | |
| Netflix Business Model Patented. | Scot Gardner | DVD Video | 2 | 09-22-2003 01:24 PM |
| Roeg's Bad Timing on DVD | Frank Malczewski | DVD Video | 0 | 07-20-2003 06:12 PM |