Go Back   Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > VHDL
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply

VHDL - VHDL testbench enhancement proposals for OO and randomization

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-06-2007, 09:41 PM   #1
Default VHDL testbench enhancement proposals for OO and randomization


Hi,
There are proposals for both OO and randomization in the
Accellera Extensions SC documents area. See webpage:
http://www.accellera.org/apps/org/wo.../documents.php

See below if you can't currently access these.

The current OO proposal is labeled Object Orientation Revisited,
is in the file, ESC-WP-001-oo-revisited.pdf, and can be downloaded
directly at (if your browser does not break the link):

http://www.accellera.org/apps/org/wo...-revisited.pdf


The current randomization proposal is labeled Randomization,
is in the file, Randomization-V1.pdf, and can be downloaded
directly at (if your browser does not break the link):
http://www.accellera.org/apps/org/wo...ization-V1.pdf


You must join the Accellera VHDL TSC to have access these documents.
You do not have to be an Accellera member to do this.
All you need to do is go to the following webpage and register:

http://www.accellera.org/activities/vhdl/

Under join here, select the appropriate "click here"
link (Accellera member vs. non-member).

Non-Accellera members fill in your name and information
and send the request to Lynn Horobin, Administration & Marketing.
In the big text box, ask to join Accellera VHDL TSC.

You may also sign up for any of the following subgroups by
request (either at the same time or sometime later - same
process though):

* VHDL-Requirements -- votes on whether to accept a requirement
* VHDL-Extensions -- creates a language extension proposal
* VHDL-Review -- votes on whether extension is what they wanted
* VHDL-LRM -- changes extension into edits for LRM

Note that most decisions in Accellera are made by consensus of all
participants. Only contentious items are decided by a
member based vote. In the last revision, I think there
were only 3 of over 100 items resolved by Accellera member
vote.

The only way your voice will not be heard is if you
fail to participate and this is up to you. In my case as
a senior member of the VHDL community, I consider it my
responsibility to participate.

Best Regards,
Jim
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~
Jim Lewis
Director of Training private.php?do=newpm&u=
SynthWorks Design Inc. http://www.SynthWorks.com
1-503-590-4787

Expert VHDL Training for Hardware Design and Verification
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~


Jim Lewis
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46