«

Hi, Everyone!

I'd need a little help. I understand this is not valid, but is there
an (easy) way to make it valid?

<xs:complexType name="control_Type">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="id" type="id_Type"/>
<xs:element name="position" type="pos_Type"/>
<xs:element name="name" type="xs:string"/>
<xs:choice>
<xs:sequence> <!-- static -->
<xs:element name="type" type="xsositiveInteger" fixed="28251"/>
<xs:element name="h_align" type="h_align_Type"/>
<xs:element name="v_align" type="v_align_Type"/>
<xs:element name="text" type="MultiLangText_Type"/>
</xs:sequence>
<xs:sequence> <!-- check -->
<xs:element name="type" type="xsositiveInteger" fixed="28252"/>
<xs:element name="is_checked" type="xs:boolean"/>
<xs:element name="text" type="MultiLangText_Type"/>
</xs:sequence>
<!-- other control types -->
</xs:choice>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>

Thank you very much!
Chris

On 5 Apr, 08:49, "puffy" <puffy.ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Everyone!
>
> I'd need a little help. I understand this is not valid, but is there
> an (easy) way to make it valid?
>
> <xs:complexType name="control_Type">
> <xs:sequence>
> <xs:element name="id" type="id_Type"/>
> <xs:element name="position" type="pos_Type"/>
> <xs:element name="name" type="xs:string"/>
> <xs:choice>
> <xs:sequence> <!-- static -->
> <xs:element name="type" type="xsositiveInteger" fixed="28251"/>
> <xs:element name="h_align" type="h_align_Type"/>
> <xs:element name="v_align" type="v_align_Type"/>
> <xs:element name="text" type="MultiLangText_Type"/>
> </xs:sequence>
> <xs:sequence> <!-- check -->
> <xs:element name="type" type="xsositiveInteger" fixed="28252"/>
> <xs:element name="is_checked" type="xs:boolean"/>
> <xs:element name="text" type="MultiLangText_Type"/>
> </xs:sequence>
> <!-- other control types -->
> </xs:choice>
> </xs:sequence>
> </xs:complexType>
>
> Thank you very much!
> Chris

I don't think schema currently offers any great solutions to this.
One option might be to do something like:

<xs:complexType name="control_Type">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="id" type="id_Type"/>
<xs:element name="position" type="pos_Type"/>
<xs:element name="name" type="xs:string"/>
<xs:choice>
<xs:sequence> <!-- static -->
<xs:element name="type28251"
type="empty"/>
<xs:element name="h_align"
type="h_align_Type"/>
<xs:element name="v_align"
type="v_align_Type"/>
<xs:element name="text"
type="MultiLangText_Type"/>
</xs:sequence>
<xs:sequence> <!-- check -->
<xs:element name="type28252"
type="empty"/>
<xs:element name="is_checked"
type="xs:boolean"/>
<xs:element name="text"
type="MultiLangText_Type"/>
</xs:sequence>
<!-- other control types -->
</xs:choice>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>

<xs:complexType name="empty"/>

Even I don't think that's pretty though!

Another option might be to use xsi:type in some way, and define a
number of restrictions or extensions for the various types.

HTH,

Pete.
--
=============================================
Pete Cordell
Tech-Know-Ware Ltd
for XML to C++ data binding visit
http://www.tech-know-ware.com/lmx/
http://www.codalogic.com/lmx/
=============================================

Hi,

"puffy" <> writes:

> <xs:complexType name="control_Type">
> <xs:sequence>
> <xs:element name="id" type="id_Type"/>
> <xs:element name="position" type="pos_Type"/>
> <xs:element name="name" type="xs:string"/>
> <xs:choice>
> <xs:sequence> <!-- static -->
> <xs:element name="type" type="xsositiveInteger" fixed="28251"/>
> <xs:element name="h_align" type="h_align_Type"/>
> <xs:element name="v_align" type="v_align_Type"/>
> <xs:element name="text" type="MultiLangText_Type"/>
> </xs:sequence>
> <xs:sequence> <!-- check -->
> <xs:element name="type" type="xsositiveInteger" fixed="28252"/>
> <xs:element name="is_checked" type="xs:boolean"/>
> <xs:element name="text" type="MultiLangText_Type"/>
> </xs:sequence>
> <!-- other control types -->
> </xs:choice>
> </xs:sequence>
> </xs:complexType>

You need to make the first element in the two sequences differ
so the schema processor can figure out which arm of the choice
it is parsing just by looking at the first element. So one way
would be to place the 'type' element at the end. Or make it an
attribute. I like the attribute option better since it has the
nice notion of storing "meta information" in attributes and
"data" in elements.


hth,
-boris


--
Boris Kolpackov
Code Synthesis Tools CC
http://www.codesynthesis.com
Open-Source, Cross-Platform C++ XML Data Binding