«

not really

--
Techie
MCNGP #21
"conner172" <> wrote in message
news:%...
> I believe Samantha implied this but didn't say it:
>
> "So there! Nyah!"
>
> That ill mannered thing has got to hurt, eh Techie?
>
> "Samantha" <> wrote in message
> news:18c1b01c44b2d$8ab25110$...
> > "Justifying my cheating"! For your information I have
> > never cheated, or used a braindump to pass any of my
> > exams, and I have never said I did in fact I made it a
> > point of saying I didn't. If after all the posts, and my
> > reason for asking the question, and how I came across the
> > website, and you still do not understand why your remarks
> > where uncalled for, and to further add insult to injury by
> > saying I cheat, which I find to be worse than calling me a
> > troll. You are clearly a close-minded, and ill-mannered
> > individual, and I have nothing further to say to you.
> > Case Close.
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >Please stop justifying your cheating by blaming others
> > >
> > >--
> > >Techie
> > >MCNGP #21
> > >"Samantha" <> wrote in
> > message
> > >news:18a9a01c44b23$ba4eee10$...
> > >> Techie,
> > >> I have a right to be on a horse when I have been
> > >> wrongfully attacked. I posted the question to get the
> > >> thougts of others in this newsgroup on it. I am not
> > sorry
> > >> for asking a question I thought this is what newsgroups
> > >> were for. And with regards to using Google, that was the
> > >> search engine I used which took me to the braindump
> > >> website. Your response was completely uncalled for,
> > and I
> > >> take offense to it because it is misleading, it gives
> > the
> > >> impression that I cheated to pass all my other exams
> > which
> > >> is not true. I only found out there was such a thing as
> > >> braindumping 1 day ago. You can be angry with me for
> > >> asking a question all you want, but who you should be
> > >> really angry with are the websites.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> >-----Original Message-----
> > >> >Samantha,
> > >> >Get off your high and mighty horse, you posted a
> > question
> > >> that you already
> > >> >knew the answer to and that if you spent 5 seconds in
> > >> this newsgroup you
> > >> >would have known it will bring down the most vicious
> > >> attacks. I hard think
> > >> >calling you a troll is insulting unless of course you
> > are
> > >> really ugly.
> > >> >
> > >> >In future please use Google before posting because this
> > >> question has been
> > >> >asked and answer a million times before its not new
> > just
> > >> because you are too
> > >> >busy to look.
> > >> >
> > >> >--
> > >> >Techie
> > >> >MCNGP #21
> > >> >"Samantha" <> wrote
> > in
> > >> message
> > >> >news:18a6901c44b1b$e7b27910$...
> > >> >> Thank you "MCSE NT4,W2K,Wk2003". Obviouly you
> > understood
> > >> >> the question I was asking, and cleared up any doubts
> > I
> > >> >> might have had, thank you for your reply and good
> > taste.
> > >> >> I am sorry I cannot say the same for "Network Guru"
> > >> >> and "Techie", where you you get off insulting me by
> > >> >> calling me a trol. I have worked hard in the field
> > of
> > >> IT
> > >> >> for 4 years, and legitimately obtain my
> > certifications
> > >> in
> > >> >> 70-217, 70-219, 70-215, and 70-210 through deligence
> > and
> > >> >> perserverance. It is blaringly clear to me that you
> > did
> > >> >> not read that I used Sybex books, Trancenders,
> > >> SmartCerty
> > >> >> online training and CBT Nuggets, all industry
> > >> respectable
> > >> >> resources to prepare for my exams. Shame on you for
> > >> >> reverting to name calling when I was simply asking a
> > >> >> question on a subject I only recently discovered
> > >> existed.
> > >> >> I wrote in here asking for clarity not degradation.
> > I
> > >> >> thought this was a place where if you had questions
> > you
> > >> >> could asked. I found your responses to be rude,smug
> > and
> > >> >> inexcusable.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >.
> > >> >
> > >
> > >
> > >.
> > >
>
>

circa Sat, 5 Jun 2004 09:41:09 -0700, in
microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, Samantha
() said,
> It is blaringly clear to me that you did
> not read that I used Sybex books, Trancenders, SmartCerty
> online training and CBT Nuggets, all industry respectable
> resources to prepare for my exams.
>
It is also clear that you are not aware of the histories of some of
the companies you mention. Transcenders are not what I would consider
"industry respectable".

Laura

circa Sat, 5 Jun 2004 09:41:09 -0700, in
microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, Samantha
() said,
> Shame on you for
> reverting to name calling when I was simply asking a
> question on a subject I only recently discovered existed.
> I wrote in here asking for clarity not degradation. I
> thought this was a place where if you had questions you
> could asked. I found your responses to be rude,smug and
> inexcusable.
>
>
Chill out, already. You didn't bother to read the newsgroup before
posting your question, so you posted something that has not only been
asked a bazillion times, but that is often posted by trolls.
Therefore, your claims that you were "wrongfully attacked" are not
quite representative of the situation at hand. And frankly, you're
waaaaay to wound up over this.

Laura

circa Sat, 5 Jun 2004 09:41:09 -0700, in
microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, Samantha
() said,
> Shame on you for
> reverting to name calling when I was simply asking a
> question on a subject I only recently discovered existed.
> I wrote in here asking for clarity not degradation. I
> thought this was a place where if you had questions you
> could asked. I found your responses to be rude,smug and
> inexcusable.
>
>
Chill out, already. You didn't bother to read the newsgroup before
posting your question, so you posted something that has not only been
asked a bazillion times, but that is often posted by trolls.
Therefore, your claims that you were "wrongfully attacked" are not
quite representative of the situation at hand. And frankly, you're
waaaaay to wound up over this.

Laura

circa Sat, 5 Jun 2004 09:41:09 -0700, in
microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, Samantha
() said,
> It is blaringly clear to me that you did
> not read that I used Sybex books, Trancenders, SmartCerty
> online training and CBT Nuggets, all industry respectable
> resources to prepare for my exams.
>
It is also clear that you are not aware of the histories of some of
the companies you mention. Transcenders are not what I would consider
"industry respectable".

Laura

Dear Samantha --

Judging by how much time you've dedicated to justify your retarded question
by replying to every single flame you've received in this newsgroup, and
your inability to admit you question was indeed, retarded, and move on, one
would have to assume you're fat, ugly and a chick serious selft steem
issues.

I suggest you go back and read your initial post and stop making an arse out
of yourself. You know very well what the word braindump implies, and you
know very well braindumps contain questions from the actual test. All you
wanted was for someone from an MCSE newsgroup to tell you it was ok to use
them so that you felt comfortable with yourself.

best regards,

-Evil

--
"The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher
esteem those who think alike than those who think differently"-Friedrich
Nietzsche


"Samantha" <> wrote in message
news:18a6901c44b1b$e7b27910$...
> Thank you "MCSE NT4,W2K,Wk2003". Obviouly you understood
> the question I was asking, and cleared up any doubts I
> might have had, thank you for your reply and good taste.
> I am sorry I cannot say the same for "Network Guru"
> and "Techie", where you you get off insulting me by
> calling me a trol. I have worked hard in the field of IT
> for 4 years, and legitimately obtain my certifications in
> 70-217, 70-219, 70-215, and 70-210 through deligence and
> perserverance. It is blaringly clear to me that you did
> not read that I used Sybex books, Trancenders, SmartCerty
> online training and CBT Nuggets, all industry respectable
> resources to prepare for my exams. Shame on you for
> reverting to name calling when I was simply asking a
> question on a subject I only recently discovered existed.
> I wrote in here asking for clarity not degradation. I
> thought this was a place where if you had questions you
> could asked. I found your responses to be rude,smug and
> inexcusable.

"Techie" <> wrote in message
news:fXnwc.54380$. ..
> Please stop justifying your cheating by blaming others

Techie, it doesn't seem that Samantha has cheated at all. If she has, shame
on her, but she's said nothing that would make me think she's a dumper. I've
been following these threads, and it does seem like she was wrongly
"attacked" (although that's not the word I'd use). Of course, she should
have googled the group and checked back posts to see what the general
consensus on dumping is. However, she should not be flamed *as* a dumper, as
she is not one. Flame for not googling, but don't flame for being an AF.


--


KB - MCNGP "silent thug" #26

first initial last name AT hotmail DOT com


---
Virus? In the computer? Are you serious?
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.699 / Virus Database: 456 - Release Date: 6/4/2004

circa Sat, 5 Jun 2004 21:59:49 -0400, in
microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, Laura A. Robinson
() said,
> to wound up
>
too
--
Experience is the name every one gives to their mistakes.
-Oscar Wilde

On Sat, 5 Jun 2004 22:00:01 -0400, Laura A. Robinson
<> wrote:

>circa Sat, 5 Jun 2004 09:41:09 -0700, in
>microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, Samantha
>() said,
>> It is blaringly clear to me that you did
>> not read that I used Sybex books, Trancenders, SmartCerty
>> online training and CBT Nuggets, all industry respectable
>> resources to prepare for my exams.
>>
>It is also clear that you are not aware of the histories of some of
>the companies you mention. Transcenders are not what I would consider
>"industry respectable".
>
>Laura


Hi Laura
Great to see you posting again at last.


I still remember the bad old days of the nt4 mcse transcenders (
when they were blatant dumps - I thought they had cleaned up their
act. I wouldnt have believed you 12 months back about Trannies being
dumps but now I agree, and its even more so on the 2003 track.

A course I was on provided me with Transcenders and Self Test for my
2003 MCSE and there were questions "word-for-word" in the transcenders
in the following exams when I sat them:

070-270
070-290
070-291
070-293
070-294

I found the self test questions to be at a closer level of difficulty
to the exams but to contain no direct rip-offs from the exams.

DONT USE TRANNIES the appear to have about 25+% of dump questions

================================
My Hero:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/30/index.html
(remove vroomfondle to email me)
================================

On Sat, 05 Jun 2004 21:12:27 +0100, The Poster Formerly Known as Kline
Sphere <.> wrote:

>>where you you get off insulting me by
>>calling me a trol.
>
>you mean 'Troll'.
>
>>I have worked hard in the field of IT
>>for 4 years
>
>Oh a newbie, that explains your ignorance.
>
>Kline Sphere (Chalk) MCNGP #3

Meeee-owwww!


================================
My Hero:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/30/index.html
(remove vroomfondle to email me)
================================