Go Back   Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > MCSE
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply

MCSE - A respond to "MCSE NT4, W2K.." "Network Guru" & "Techie"

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-05-2004, 05:41 PM   #1
Default A respond to "MCSE NT4, W2K.." "Network Guru" & "Techie"


Thank you "MCSE NT4,W2K,Wk2003". Obviouly you understood
the question I was asking, and cleared up any doubts I
might have had, thank you for your reply and good taste.
I am sorry I cannot say the same for "Network Guru"
and "Techie", where you you get off insulting me by
calling me a trol. I have worked hard in the field of IT
for 4 years, and legitimately obtain my certifications in
70-217, 70-219, 70-215, and 70-210 through deligence and
perserverance. It is blaringly clear to me that you did
not read that I used Sybex books, Trancenders, SmartCerty
online training and CBT Nuggets, all industry respectable
resources to prepare for my exams. Shame on you for
reverting to name calling when I was simply asking a
question on a subject I only recently discovered existed.
I wrote in here asking for clarity not degradation. I
thought this was a place where if you had questions you
could asked. I found your responses to be rude,smug and
inexcusable.


Samantha
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2004, 05:53 PM   #2
Techie
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A respond to "MCSE NT4, W2K.." "Network Guru" & "Techie"
Samantha,
Get off your high and mighty horse, you posted a question that you already
knew the answer to and that if you spent 5 seconds in this newsgroup you
would have known it will bring down the most vicious attacks. I hard think
calling you a troll is insulting unless of course you are really ugly.

In future please use Google before posting because this question has been
asked and answer a million times before its not new just because you are too
busy to look.

--
Techie
MCNGP #21
"Samantha" <> wrote in message
news:18a6901c44b1b$e7b27910$...
> Thank you "MCSE NT4,W2K,Wk2003". Obviouly you understood
> the question I was asking, and cleared up any doubts I
> might have had, thank you for your reply and good taste.
> I am sorry I cannot say the same for "Network Guru"
> and "Techie", where you you get off insulting me by
> calling me a trol. I have worked hard in the field of IT
> for 4 years, and legitimately obtain my certifications in
> 70-217, 70-219, 70-215, and 70-210 through deligence and
> perserverance. It is blaringly clear to me that you did
> not read that I used Sybex books, Trancenders, SmartCerty
> online training and CBT Nuggets, all industry respectable
> resources to prepare for my exams. Shame on you for
> reverting to name calling when I was simply asking a
> question on a subject I only recently discovered existed.
> I wrote in here asking for clarity not degradation. I
> thought this was a place where if you had questions you
> could asked. I found your responses to be rude,smug and
> inexcusable.





Techie
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2004, 06:11 PM   #3
Network Guru
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A respond to "MCSE NT4, W2K.." "Network Guru" & "Techie"

"Samantha" <> wrote in message
news:18a6901c44b1b$e7b27910$...
> Thank you "MCSE NT4,W2K,Wk2003". Obviouly you understood
> the question I was asking, and cleared up any doubts I
> might have had, thank you for your reply and good taste.
> I am sorry I cannot say the same for "Network Guru"
> and "Techie", where you you get off insulting me by
> calling me a trol. I have worked hard in the field of IT
> for 4 years, and legitimately obtain my certifications in
> 70-217, 70-219, 70-215, and 70-210 through deligence and
> perserverance. It is blaringly clear to me that you did
> not read that I used Sybex books, Trancenders, SmartCerty
> online training and CBT Nuggets, all industry respectable
> resources to prepare for my exams. Shame on you for
> reverting to name calling when I was simply asking a
> question on a subject I only recently discovered existed.
> I wrote in here asking for clarity not degradation. I
> thought this was a place where if you had questions you
> could asked. I found your responses to be rude,smug and
> inexcusable.



You deserve to be hit with Chalk's phrase in its purest form, but the rules
of conduct prohibit me from doing it. I am a magnanimous individual, hence
I follow the rules of conduct.







Network Guru
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2004, 06:37 PM   #4
Samantha
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A respond to "MCSE NT4, W2K.." "Network Guru" & "Techie"
Techie,
I have a right to be on a horse when I have been
wrongfully attacked. I posted the question to get the
thougts of others in this newsgroup on it. I am not sorry
for asking a question I thought this is what newsgroups
were for. And with regards to using Google, that was the
search engine I used which took me to the braindump
website. Your response was completely uncalled for, and I
take offense to it because it is misleading, it gives the
impression that I cheated to pass all my other exams which
is not true. I only found out there was such a thing as
braindumping 1 day ago. You can be angry with me for
asking a question all you want, but who you should be
really angry with are the websites.


>-----Original Message-----
>Samantha,
>Get off your high and mighty horse, you posted a question

that you already
>knew the answer to and that if you spent 5 seconds in

this newsgroup you
>would have known it will bring down the most vicious

attacks. I hard think
>calling you a troll is insulting unless of course you are

really ugly.
>
>In future please use Google before posting because this

question has been
>asked and answer a million times before its not new just

because you are too
>busy to look.
>
>--
>Techie
>MCNGP #21
>"Samantha" <> wrote in

message
>news:18a6901c44b1b$e7b27910$...
>> Thank you "MCSE NT4,W2K,Wk2003". Obviouly you understood
>> the question I was asking, and cleared up any doubts I
>> might have had, thank you for your reply and good taste.
>> I am sorry I cannot say the same for "Network Guru"
>> and "Techie", where you you get off insulting me by
>> calling me a trol. I have worked hard in the field of

IT
>> for 4 years, and legitimately obtain my certifications

in
>> 70-217, 70-219, 70-215, and 70-210 through deligence and
>> perserverance. It is blaringly clear to me that you did
>> not read that I used Sybex books, Trancenders,

SmartCerty
>> online training and CBT Nuggets, all industry

respectable
>> resources to prepare for my exams. Shame on you for
>> reverting to name calling when I was simply asking a
>> question on a subject I only recently discovered

existed.
>> I wrote in here asking for clarity not degradation. I
>> thought this was a place where if you had questions you
>> could asked. I found your responses to be rude,smug and
>> inexcusable.

>
>
>.
>



Samantha
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2004, 07:05 PM   #5
Techie
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A respond to "MCSE NT4, W2K.." "Network Guru" & "Techie"
Please stop justifying your cheating by blaming others

--
Techie
MCNGP #21
"Samantha" <> wrote in message
news:18a9a01c44b23$ba4eee10$...
> Techie,
> I have a right to be on a horse when I have been
> wrongfully attacked. I posted the question to get the
> thougts of others in this newsgroup on it. I am not sorry
> for asking a question I thought this is what newsgroups
> were for. And with regards to using Google, that was the
> search engine I used which took me to the braindump
> website. Your response was completely uncalled for, and I
> take offense to it because it is misleading, it gives the
> impression that I cheated to pass all my other exams which
> is not true. I only found out there was such a thing as
> braindumping 1 day ago. You can be angry with me for
> asking a question all you want, but who you should be
> really angry with are the websites.
>
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >Samantha,
> >Get off your high and mighty horse, you posted a question

> that you already
> >knew the answer to and that if you spent 5 seconds in

> this newsgroup you
> >would have known it will bring down the most vicious

> attacks. I hard think
> >calling you a troll is insulting unless of course you are

> really ugly.
> >
> >In future please use Google before posting because this

> question has been
> >asked and answer a million times before its not new just

> because you are too
> >busy to look.
> >
> >--
> >Techie
> >MCNGP #21
> >"Samantha" <> wrote in

> message
> >news:18a6901c44b1b$e7b27910$...
> >> Thank you "MCSE NT4,W2K,Wk2003". Obviouly you understood
> >> the question I was asking, and cleared up any doubts I
> >> might have had, thank you for your reply and good taste.
> >> I am sorry I cannot say the same for "Network Guru"
> >> and "Techie", where you you get off insulting me by
> >> calling me a trol. I have worked hard in the field of

> IT
> >> for 4 years, and legitimately obtain my certifications

> in
> >> 70-217, 70-219, 70-215, and 70-210 through deligence and
> >> perserverance. It is blaringly clear to me that you did
> >> not read that I used Sybex books, Trancenders,

> SmartCerty
> >> online training and CBT Nuggets, all industry

> respectable
> >> resources to prepare for my exams. Shame on you for
> >> reverting to name calling when I was simply asking a
> >> question on a subject I only recently discovered

> existed.
> >> I wrote in here asking for clarity not degradation. I
> >> thought this was a place where if you had questions you
> >> could asked. I found your responses to be rude,smug and
> >> inexcusable.

> >
> >
> >.
> >





Techie
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2004, 07:47 PM   #6
Samantha
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A respond to "MCSE NT4, W2K.." "Network Guru" & "Techie"
"Justifying my cheating"! For your information I have
never cheated, or used a braindump to pass any of my
exams, and I have never said I did in fact I made it a
point of saying I didn't. If after all the posts, and my
reason for asking the question, and how I came across the
website, and you still do not understand why your remarks
where uncalled for, and to further add insult to injury by
saying I cheat, which I find to be worse than calling me a
troll. You are clearly a close-minded, and ill-mannered
individual, and I have nothing further to say to you.
Case Close.
>-----Original Message-----
>Please stop justifying your cheating by blaming others
>
>--
>Techie
>MCNGP #21
>"Samantha" <> wrote in

message
>news:18a9a01c44b23$ba4eee10$...
>> Techie,
>> I have a right to be on a horse when I have been
>> wrongfully attacked. I posted the question to get the
>> thougts of others in this newsgroup on it. I am not

sorry
>> for asking a question I thought this is what newsgroups
>> were for. And with regards to using Google, that was the
>> search engine I used which took me to the braindump
>> website. Your response was completely uncalled for,

and I
>> take offense to it because it is misleading, it gives

the
>> impression that I cheated to pass all my other exams

which
>> is not true. I only found out there was such a thing as
>> braindumping 1 day ago. You can be angry with me for
>> asking a question all you want, but who you should be
>> really angry with are the websites.
>>
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >Samantha,
>> >Get off your high and mighty horse, you posted a

question
>> that you already
>> >knew the answer to and that if you spent 5 seconds in

>> this newsgroup you
>> >would have known it will bring down the most vicious

>> attacks. I hard think
>> >calling you a troll is insulting unless of course you

are
>> really ugly.
>> >
>> >In future please use Google before posting because this

>> question has been
>> >asked and answer a million times before its not new

just
>> because you are too
>> >busy to look.
>> >
>> >--
>> >Techie
>> >MCNGP #21
>> >"Samantha" <> wrote

in
>> message
>> >news:18a6901c44b1b$e7b27910$...
>> >> Thank you "MCSE NT4,W2K,Wk2003". Obviouly you

understood
>> >> the question I was asking, and cleared up any doubts

I
>> >> might have had, thank you for your reply and good

taste.
>> >> I am sorry I cannot say the same for "Network Guru"
>> >> and "Techie", where you you get off insulting me by
>> >> calling me a trol. I have worked hard in the field

of
>> IT
>> >> for 4 years, and legitimately obtain my

certifications
>> in
>> >> 70-217, 70-219, 70-215, and 70-210 through deligence

and
>> >> perserverance. It is blaringly clear to me that you

did
>> >> not read that I used Sybex books, Trancenders,

>> SmartCerty
>> >> online training and CBT Nuggets, all industry

>> respectable
>> >> resources to prepare for my exams. Shame on you for
>> >> reverting to name calling when I was simply asking a
>> >> question on a subject I only recently discovered

>> existed.
>> >> I wrote in here asking for clarity not degradation.

I
>> >> thought this was a place where if you had questions

you
>> >> could asked. I found your responses to be rude,smug

and
>> >> inexcusable.
>> >
>> >
>> >.
>> >

>
>
>.
>



Samantha
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2004, 09:12 PM   #7
The Poster Formerly Known as Kline Sphere
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A respond to "MCSE NT4, W2K.." "Network Guru" & "Techie"
>where you you get off insulting me by
>calling me a trol.


you mean 'Troll'.

>I have worked hard in the field of IT
>for 4 years


Oh a newbie, that explains your ignorance.

Kline Sphere (Chalk) MCNGP #3


The Poster Formerly Known as Kline Sphere
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2004, 10:57 PM   #8
Laura A. Robinson
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A respond to "MCSE NT4, W2K.." "Network Guru" & "Techie"
circa Sat, 5 Jun 2004 09:41:09 -0700, in
microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, Samantha
() said,
> It is blaringly clear to me that you did
> not read that I used Sybex books, Trancenders, SmartCerty
> online training and CBT Nuggets, all industry respectable
> resources to prepare for my exams.
>

It is also clear that you are not aware of the histories of some of
the companies you mention. Transcenders are not what I would consider
"industry respectable".

Laura
--
I am Dyslexia of Borg,
Your ass will be laminated.


Laura A. Robinson
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2004, 10:59 PM   #9
Laura A. Robinson
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A respond to "MCSE NT4, W2K.." "Network Guru" & "Techie"
circa Sat, 5 Jun 2004 09:41:09 -0700, in
microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, Samantha
() said,
> Shame on you for
> reverting to name calling when I was simply asking a
> question on a subject I only recently discovered existed.
> I wrote in here asking for clarity not degradation. I
> thought this was a place where if you had questions you
> could asked. I found your responses to be rude,smug and
> inexcusable.
>
>

Chill out, already. You didn't bother to read the newsgroup before
posting your question, so you posted something that has not only been
asked a bazillion times, but that is often posted by trolls.
Therefore, your claims that you were "wrongfully attacked" are not
quite representative of the situation at hand. And frankly, you're
waaaaay to wound up over this.

Laura
--
I am Dyslexia of Borg,
Your ass will be laminated.


Laura A. Robinson
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2004, 01:19 AM   #10
conner172
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A respond to "MCSE NT4, W2K.." "Network Guru" & "Techie"
I believe Samantha implied this but didn't say it:

"So there! Nyah!"

That ill mannered thing has got to hurt, eh Techie?

"Samantha" <> wrote in message
news:18c1b01c44b2d$8ab25110$...
> "Justifying my cheating"! For your information I have
> never cheated, or used a braindump to pass any of my
> exams, and I have never said I did in fact I made it a
> point of saying I didn't. If after all the posts, and my
> reason for asking the question, and how I came across the
> website, and you still do not understand why your remarks
> where uncalled for, and to further add insult to injury by
> saying I cheat, which I find to be worse than calling me a
> troll. You are clearly a close-minded, and ill-mannered
> individual, and I have nothing further to say to you.
> Case Close.
> >-----Original Message-----
> >Please stop justifying your cheating by blaming others
> >
> >--
> >Techie
> >MCNGP #21
> >"Samantha" <> wrote in

> message
> >news:18a9a01c44b23$ba4eee10$...
> >> Techie,
> >> I have a right to be on a horse when I have been
> >> wrongfully attacked. I posted the question to get the
> >> thougts of others in this newsgroup on it. I am not

> sorry
> >> for asking a question I thought this is what newsgroups
> >> were for. And with regards to using Google, that was the
> >> search engine I used which took me to the braindump
> >> website. Your response was completely uncalled for,

> and I
> >> take offense to it because it is misleading, it gives

> the
> >> impression that I cheated to pass all my other exams

> which
> >> is not true. I only found out there was such a thing as
> >> braindumping 1 day ago. You can be angry with me for
> >> asking a question all you want, but who you should be
> >> really angry with are the websites.
> >>
> >>
> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >Samantha,
> >> >Get off your high and mighty horse, you posted a

> question
> >> that you already
> >> >knew the answer to and that if you spent 5 seconds in
> >> this newsgroup you
> >> >would have known it will bring down the most vicious
> >> attacks. I hard think
> >> >calling you a troll is insulting unless of course you

> are
> >> really ugly.
> >> >
> >> >In future please use Google before posting because this
> >> question has been
> >> >asked and answer a million times before its not new

> just
> >> because you are too
> >> >busy to look.
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >Techie
> >> >MCNGP #21
> >> >"Samantha" <> wrote

> in
> >> message
> >> >news:18a6901c44b1b$e7b27910$...
> >> >> Thank you "MCSE NT4,W2K,Wk2003". Obviouly you

> understood
> >> >> the question I was asking, and cleared up any doubts

> I
> >> >> might have had, thank you for your reply and good

> taste.
> >> >> I am sorry I cannot say the same for "Network Guru"
> >> >> and "Techie", where you you get off insulting me by
> >> >> calling me a trol. I have worked hard in the field

> of
> >> IT
> >> >> for 4 years, and legitimately obtain my

> certifications
> >> in
> >> >> 70-217, 70-219, 70-215, and 70-210 through deligence

> and
> >> >> perserverance. It is blaringly clear to me that you

> did
> >> >> not read that I used Sybex books, Trancenders,
> >> SmartCerty
> >> >> online training and CBT Nuggets, all industry
> >> respectable
> >> >> resources to prepare for my exams. Shame on you for
> >> >> reverting to name calling when I was simply asking a
> >> >> question on a subject I only recently discovered
> >> existed.
> >> >> I wrote in here asking for clarity not degradation.

> I
> >> >> thought this was a place where if you had questions

> you
> >> >> could asked. I found your responses to be rude,smug

> and
> >> >> inexcusable.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >.
> >> >

> >
> >
> >.
> >





conner172
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46