«

http://www.auslogics.com/

Just finished running this defrager.It is extremely fast & Graphical too.
This ones a keeper!!!!

"Kue2" <> wrote in message
news:CAB31A2E-52E0-4B91-8FF8-...
> http://www.auslogics.com/

W2K, XP, Vista, 2003 - but, no mention of 64bit in there?


Tony. . .


"Kue2" <> wrote in message
news:525522C2-BF35-4B67-8687-...
> Just finished running this defrager.It is extremely fast & Graphical too.
> This ones a keeper!!!!
>
> "Kue2" <> wrote in message
> news:CAB31A2E-52E0-4B91-8FF8-...
> > http://www.auslogics.com/
>

Hi Tony!
I ran it in vista 64 no problem installing or using the software.

"Tony Sperling" <> wrote in message
news:O53L$...
> W2K, XP, Vista, 2003 - but, no mention of 64bit in there?
>
>
> Tony. . .
>
>
> "Kue2" <> wrote in message
> news:525522C2-BF35-4B67-8687-...
>> Just finished running this defrager.It is extremely fast & Graphical too.
>> This ones a keeper!!!!
>>
>> "Kue2" <> wrote in message
>> news:CAB31A2E-52E0-4B91-8FF8-...
>> > http://www.auslogics.com/
>>
>
>

I just fetched it for my W2K system, to see - O.K. I give it a whirl all
around.


Tony. . .


"Kue2" <> wrote in message
news:3DE913AD-8332-4FF2-A5F3-...
> Hi Tony!
> I ran it in vista 64 no problem installing or using the software.
>
> "Tony Sperling" <> wrote in message
> news:O53L$...
> > W2K, XP, Vista, 2003 - but, no mention of 64bit in there?
> >
> >
> > Tony. . .
> >
> >
> > "Kue2" <> wrote in message
> > news:525522C2-BF35-4B67-8687-...
> >> Just finished running this defrager.It is extremely fast & Graphical
too.
> >> This ones a keeper!!!!
> >>
> >> "Kue2" <> wrote in message
> >> news:CAB31A2E-52E0-4B91-8FF8-...
> >> > http://www.auslogics.com/
> >>
> >
> >
>

Works fine in x64.

--
Jane, not plain 64 bit enabled
Batteries not included. Braincell on vacation
"Tony Sperling" <> wrote in message
news:O53L$...
> W2K, XP, Vista, 2003 - but, no mention of 64bit in there?
>
>
> Tony. . .
>
>
> "Kue2" <> wrote in message
> news:525522C2-BF35-4B67-8687-...
>> Just finished running this defrager.It is extremely fast & Graphical too.
>> This ones a keeper!!!!
>>
>> "Kue2" <> wrote in message
>> news:CAB31A2E-52E0-4B91-8FF8-...
>> > http://www.auslogics.com/
>>
>
>

Some of the defraggers have been erasing restore points on Vista. Has
anyone checked this one.


"Kue2" <> wrote in message
news:3DE913AD-8332-4FF2-A5F3-...
> Hi Tony!
> I ran it in vista 64 no problem installing or using the software.
>
> "Tony Sperling" <> wrote in message
> news:O53L$...
>> W2K, XP, Vista, 2003 - but, no mention of 64bit in there?
>>
>>
>> Tony. . .
>>
>>
>> "Kue2" <> wrote in message
>> news:525522C2-BF35-4B67-8687-...
>>> Just finished running this defrager.It is extremely fast & Graphical
>>> too.
>>> This ones a keeper!!!!
>>>
>>> "Kue2" <> wrote in message
>>> news:CAB31A2E-52E0-4B91-8FF8-...
>>> > http://www.auslogics.com/
>>>
>>
>>
>

Ran this defrager on Vista 64 then on XP 64 then on XP no problems very
very fast.

"John Barnes" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Some of the defraggers have been erasing restore points on Vista. Has
> anyone checked this one.
>
>
> "Kue2" <> wrote in message
> news:3DE913AD-8332-4FF2-A5F3-...
>> Hi Tony!
>> I ran it in vista 64 no problem installing or using the software.
>>
>> "Tony Sperling" <> wrote in message
>> news:O53L$...
>>> W2K, XP, Vista, 2003 - but, no mention of 64bit in there?
>>>
>>>
>>> Tony. . .
>>>
>>>
>>> "Kue2" <> wrote in message
>>> news:525522C2-BF35-4B67-8687-...
>>>> Just finished running this defrager.It is extremely fast & Graphical
>>>> too.
>>>> This ones a keeper!!!!
>>>>
>>>> "Kue2" <> wrote in message
>>>> news:CAB31A2E-52E0-4B91-8FF8-...
>>>> > http://www.auslogics.com/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

OK, I'm having a hard time understanding why you think you need a defragger
in Vista. XP x64? Certainly. But Vista has automatic background
defragmentation built in to the OS. IME, it stays quite well defragged.

--
Charlie.
http://msmvps.com/xperts64


"Kue2" <> wrote in message
news:CAB31A2E-52E0-4B91-8FF8-...
> http://www.auslogics.com/

On 06.03.2007 04:21, Kue2 wrote:
>
> Ran this defrager on Vista 64 then on XP 64 then on XP no problems
> very very fast.

And you are sure it actually did defrag the drive and not do something else?

robert