Hello Susanne,
I checked to just to make sure. Yes if the hardware supports it, Windows
XP x64 edition supports running headless
Thanks,
Darrell Gorter[MSFT]
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights
--------------------
<Thread-Topic: Is headless support provided?
<thread-index: Acb4AB53J+HVFQkrQe6z3ZbWKhIC1w==
<X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 193.138.10.41
<From: =?Utf-8?B?U3VzYW5uZSBTdMO2aHI=?=
<>
<References: <FC00EE30-17DE-4590-BEA7->
<DCDB54BB-BDA4-4645-B751->
<>
<Subject: Re: Is headless support provided?
<Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 23:38:02 -0700
<Lines: 82
<Message-ID: <C07EC5AA-74BF-4AC6-97DC->
<MIME-Version: 1.0
<Content-Type: text/plain;
< charset="Utf-8"
<Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
<Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
<Importance: normal
<Priority: normal
<X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.1830
<Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general
<Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
<Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general:41669
<NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
<X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general
<
<Hello,
<
<it is true that Windows XP embedded supports running headless. And I am
just
<talking about running headless and not about running EMS. We have to know
for
<sure now as the current hardware design depends on this information.
<
<Greetings
< Susanne Stöhr
<
<""Darrell Gorter[MSFT]"" wrote:
<
<> Hello,
<> It should work as far as I know. I think the same code for running
<> headless exists on both client and server.
<> For example embedded Windows XP would have to support running headless.
<> We are just talking running headless right or are we also asking about
<> running EMS?
<> Thanks,
<> Darrell Gorter[MSFT]
<>
<> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights
<> --------------------
<> <From: "Charlie Russel - MVP" <>
<> <References: <FC00EE30-17DE-4590-BEA7->
<> <In-Reply-To: <FC00EE30-17DE-4590-BEA7->
<> <Subject: Re: Is headless support provided?
<> <Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 10:09:05 -0700
<> <Lines: 28
<> <Message-ID: <DCDB54BB-BDA4-4645-B751->
<> <MIME-Version: 1.0
<> <Content-Type: text/plain;
<> < format=flowed;
<> < charset="Utf-8";
<> < reply-type=original
<> <Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<> <X-Priority: 3
<> <X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
<> <X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.5744.16384
<> <X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.5744.16384
<> <X-MS-CommunityGroup-PostID: {DCDB54BB-BDA4-4645-B751-D7FB2BA09126}
<> <X-MS-CommunityGroup-ThreadID: FC00EE30-17DE-4590-BEA7-26875A7B7FFE
<> <X-MS-CommunityGroup-ParentID: FC00EE30-17DE-4590-BEA7-26875A7B7FFE
<> <Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general
<> <Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
<> <Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general:41599
<> <NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl 127.0.0.1
<> <X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general
<> <
<> <I honestly don't know, but I would not expect it to work in XP. Given
that
<> <XP is not supposed to be a server operating system, the case for
headless
<> is
<> <not terribly compelling. But, given that XP x64 is based on Server 2k3
SP1
<> <code, you might get lucky. But I doubt it would be considered a
supported
<> <scenario.
<> <
<> <--
<> <Charlie.
<> <
http://msmvps.com/xperts64
<> <
<> <
<> <"Susanne Stöhr" <Susanne Stö> wrote
in
<> message
<> <news:FC00EE30-17DE-4590-BEA7-...
<> <> Could somone please tell me whether the 64-bit XP already supports
<> <> headless
<> <> operating? Or will only server editions of 64-bit Windows provide
<> support
<> <> for
<> <> headless operating as indicated in the article 'Designing for 64-bit
<> <> Windows'
<> <> at
www.microsoft.com?
<> <>
<> <> Specifically, I am interested whether I can remove the video
controller.
<> <> Our
<> <> BIOS will support use without the video card present.
<> <>
<> <> Regards,
<> <> Susanne
<> <
<> <
<>
<>
<
Similar Threads
