«

any??????

On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 19:20:38 -0400, "Hugh Kennedy"
<> wrote:

>any??????

No. Been bugging them a few times already, but they have no answer.
The 32-bit version works fine, but only in the 32-bit IE.
Maybe when Vista64 shows up things might change

jud

* Hugh Kennedy:

> any??????

There is no. Besides that, what do you expect a 64bit flash player does
better than the 32bit version?

Benjamin

Works with IE64. It is a hassle to have to figure out whether you have a 32
or 64 bit IE as you are browsing. Click a link from OE and you have a
browser window which flash won't work on. Microsoft has lots of sites that
want to download the flash player.


"Benjamin Gawert" <> wrote in message
news:%...
>* Hugh Kennedy:
>
>> any??????
>
> There is no. Besides that, what do you expect a 64bit flash player does
> better than the 32bit version?
>
> Benjamin

Thanks, John - You just ruined a good night's sleep! :0|


Tony. . .


"John Barnes" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Works with IE64. It is a hassle to have to figure out whether you have a
32
> or 64 bit IE as you are browsing. Click a link from OE and you have a
> browser window which flash won't work on. Microsoft has lots of sites
that
> want to download the flash player.
>
>
> "Benjamin Gawert" <> wrote in message
> news:%...
> >* Hugh Kennedy:
> >
> >> any??????
> >
> > There is no. Besides that, what do you expect a 64bit flash player does
> > better than the 32bit version?
> >
> > Benjamin
>
>

I agreed too it is a hassle and time waster to switch in IE32 to see flash
sites
"John Barnes" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Works with IE64. It is a hassle to have to figure out whether you have a
> 32 or 64 bit IE as you are browsing. Click a link from OE and you have a
> browser window which flash won't work on. Microsoft has lots of sites
> that want to download the flash player.
>
>
> "Benjamin Gawert" <> wrote in message
> news:%...
>>* Hugh Kennedy:
>>
>>> any??????
>>
>> There is no. Besides that, what do you expect a 64bit flash player does
>> better than the 32bit version?
>>
>> Benjamin
>
>

* John Barnes:

> Works with IE64. It is a hassle to have to figure out whether you have a 32
> or 64 bit IE as you are browsing. Click a link from OE and you have a
> browser window which flash won't work on. Microsoft has lots of sites that
> want to download the flash player.

Why use IE64 anyways? Flash is not the only thing which doesn't work
with IE64, and on the other side IE64 does nothing better than 32bit IE...

Benjamin

Because, as I said, it automatically launches from OE and is a pain to
copy/paste to an IE32 version. I agree nothing about it works better. How
many emails have you gotten from Microsoft, clicked on a link, then be
bugged by the admonition to install the flash player? Then you have to
either pass or copy paste to an IE32 window.
They can make the 32-bit flash player compatible with IE64 and I would be
happy. Java too

"Benjamin Gawert" <> wrote in message
news:...
>* John Barnes:
>
>> Works with IE64. It is a hassle to have to figure out whether you have a
>> 32 or 64 bit IE as you are browsing. Click a link from OE and you have a
>> browser window which flash won't work on. Microsoft has lots of sites
>> that want to download the flash player.
>
> Why use IE64 anyways? Flash is not the only thing which doesn't work with
> IE64, and on the other side IE64 does nothing better than 32bit IE...
>
> Benjamin

Since you still don't have to install it, you can sleep peacefully again.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
I personally prefer IE32 because all the flash ads are blocked by Admuncher
as well as other ads Wish it worked on IE64 too.

"Tony Sperling" <> wrote in message
news:u$...
> Thanks, John - You just ruined a good night's sleep! :0|
>
>
> Tony. . .
>
>
> "John Barnes" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>> Works with IE64. It is a hassle to have to figure out whether you have a
> 32
>> or 64 bit IE as you are browsing. Click a link from OE and you have a
>> browser window which flash won't work on. Microsoft has lots of sites
> that
>> want to download the flash player.
>>
>>
>> "Benjamin Gawert" <> wrote in message
>> news:%...
>> >* Hugh Kennedy:
>> >
>> >> any??????
>> >
>> > There is no. Besides that, what do you expect a 64bit flash player does
>> > better than the 32bit version?
>> >
>> > Benjamin
>>
>>
>
>

* John Barnes:

> Because, as I said, it automatically launches from OE and is a pain to
> copy/paste to an IE32 version. I agree nothing about it works better. How
> many emails have you gotten from Microsoft, clicked on a link, then be
> bugged by the admonition to install the flash player? Then you have to
> either pass or copy paste to an IE32 window.

Right, I forgot that the default browser in xp x64 is IE64 because I use
Firefox. It's a stupid default setting. Maybe there is a way to set the
default to 32bit IE?

Benjamin