«

Version 91.33 is out today. Guess the 91.31 out two days ago didn't work
out too well. Charlie rules.

Appears the drivers are the nForce drivers NOT the gForce video drivers the
description said they were.


"John Barnes" <> wrote in message
news:5B2B257E-53D2-4A56-9D57-...
> Version 91.33 is out today. Guess the 91.31 out two days ago didn't work
> out too well. Charlie rules.

I think this has been the case for some time now. I was under the impression
that since having completed the 'Unified Driver' principle, they had all
support shipped in the nForce driver and the installer decides what physical
support is present and needs to have driver support installed?

I visited the download page just now, and the xx.31 is still the official
download - going to the Beta page, there is the xx.33. But no card specific
drivers at all that I can see - only nForce!

But then, perhaps we are seeing the effect of webserver cache updating
differences across the world?

Ah, yes - the link you posted otherwheres is indeed specifying a Forceware
[Beta] driver, too


Tony. . .


"John Barnes" <> wrote in message
newsD1EAC47-7145-4228-BCFA-...
> Appears the drivers are the nForce drivers NOT the gForce video drivers
the
> description said they were.
>
>
> "John Barnes" <> wrote in message
> news:5B2B257E-53D2-4A56-9D57-...
> > Version 91.33 is out today. Guess the 91.31 out two days ago didn't
work
> > out too well. Charlie rules.
>

Am I missing something?
91.33 are for 32-bit only, not x64.

--
Asus P5WDG2-WS (i975X Express)
P4 3.73 GHz EE
RAPTOR 2x150 GB RAID 0 (ICH7R)
2GB DDR2-800MHz@5-4-4-9-5
GeForce 7800GTX (91.31)
Samsung 24"
Enermax 660W 35A@+12V
5049 3DMarks 06
LAN 100/100


"Tony Sperling" wrote:

> I think this has been the case for some time now. I was under the impression
> that since having completed the 'Unified Driver' principle, they had all
> support shipped in the nForce driver and the installer decides what physical
> support is present and needs to have driver support installed?
>
> I visited the download page just now, and the xx.31 is still the official
> download - going to the Beta page, there is the xx.33. But no card specific
> drivers at all that I can see - only nForce!
>
> But then, perhaps we are seeing the effect of webserver cache updating
> differences across the world?
>
> Ah, yes - the link you posted otherwheres is indeed specifying a Forceware
> [Beta] driver, too
>
>
> Tony. . .
>
>
> "John Barnes" <> wrote in message
> newsD1EAC47-7145-4228-BCFA-...
> > Appears the drivers are the nForce drivers NOT the gForce video drivers
> the
> > description said they were.
> >
> >
> > "John Barnes" <> wrote in message
> > news:5B2B257E-53D2-4A56-9D57-...
> > > Version 91.33 is out today. Guess the 91.31 out two days ago didn't
> work
> > > out too well. Charlie rules.
> >
>
>
>

After polishing my glasses, I'd say that it would seem you are right.


Tony. . .


"Maratonmannen" <> wrote in message
news:630961C0-76E7-479F-A4BB-...
> Am I missing something?
> 91.33 are for 32-bit only, not x64.
>
> --
> Asus P5WDG2-WS (i975X Express)
> P4 3.73 GHz EE
> RAPTOR 2x150 GB RAID 0 (ICH7R)
> 2GB DDR2-800MHz@5-4-4-9-5
> GeForce 7800GTX (91.31)
> Samsung 24"
> Enermax 660W 35A@+12V
> 5049 3DMarks 06
> LAN 100/100
>
>
> "Tony Sperling" wrote:
>
> > I think this has been the case for some time now. I was under the
impression
> > that since having completed the 'Unified Driver' principle, they had all
> > support shipped in the nForce driver and the installer decides what
physical
> > support is present and needs to have driver support installed?
> >
> > I visited the download page just now, and the xx.31 is still the
official
> > download - going to the Beta page, there is the xx.33. But no card
specific
> > drivers at all that I can see - only nForce!
> >
> > But then, perhaps we are seeing the effect of webserver cache updating
> > differences across the world?
> >
> > Ah, yes - the link you posted otherwheres is indeed specifying a
Forceware
> > [Beta] driver, too
> >
> >
> > Tony. . .
> >
> >
> > "John Barnes" <> wrote in message
> > newsD1EAC47-7145-4228-BCFA-...
> > > Appears the drivers are the nForce drivers NOT the gForce video
drivers
> > the
> > > description said they were.
> > >
> > >
> > > "John Barnes" <> wrote in message
> > > news:5B2B257E-53D2-4A56-9D57-...
> > > > Version 91.33 is out today. Guess the 91.31 out two days ago didn't
> > work
> > > > out too well. Charlie rules.
> > >
> >
> >
> >

nVIDIA ForceWare Drivers for Windows XP/2003 (64-bit) 91.33 Official Beta
beta

Looks like 64-bit thru my glasses There is a separate one for 32-bit and
one for Vista. I was in Vista and didn't try the 64-bit ones, but
downloaded both and it was when I was reading the readme for the Vista ones,
that I noticed that the driver files were IDE etc not the ones for the video
card as indicated in the accompanying text.


"Tony Sperling" <> wrote in message
news:%...
> After polishing my glasses, I'd say that it would seem you are right.
>
>
> Tony. . .
>
>
> "Maratonmannen" <> wrote in message
> news:630961C0-76E7-479F-A4BB-...
>> Am I missing something?
>> 91.33 are for 32-bit only, not x64.
>>
>> --
>> Asus P5WDG2-WS (i975X Express)
>> P4 3.73 GHz EE
>> RAPTOR 2x150 GB RAID 0 (ICH7R)
>> 2GB DDR2-800MHz@5-4-4-9-5
>> GeForce 7800GTX (91.31)
>> Samsung 24"
>> Enermax 660W 35A@+12V
>> 5049 3DMarks 06
>> LAN 100/100
>>
>>
>> "Tony Sperling" wrote:
>>
>> > I think this has been the case for some time now. I was under the
> impression
>> > that since having completed the 'Unified Driver' principle, they had
>> > all
>> > support shipped in the nForce driver and the installer decides what
> physical
>> > support is present and needs to have driver support installed?
>> >
>> > I visited the download page just now, and the xx.31 is still the
> official
>> > download - going to the Beta page, there is the xx.33. But no card
> specific
>> > drivers at all that I can see - only nForce!
>> >
>> > But then, perhaps we are seeing the effect of webserver cache updating
>> > differences across the world?
>> >
>> > Ah, yes - the link you posted otherwheres is indeed specifying a
> Forceware
>> > [Beta] driver, too
>> >
>> >
>> > Tony. . .
>> >
>> >
>> > "John Barnes" <> wrote in message
>> > newsD1EAC47-7145-4228-BCFA-...
>> > > Appears the drivers are the nForce drivers NOT the gForce video
> drivers
>> > the
>> > > description said they were.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > "John Barnes" <> wrote in message
>> > > news:5B2B257E-53D2-4A56-9D57-...
>> > > > Version 91.33 is out today. Guess the 91.31 out two days ago
>> > > > didn't
>> > work
>> > > > out too well. Charlie rules.
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>

Does appear that even though labeled as for 64-bit the size matches the
32-bit ones on the nVidia beta site, and so far there is no new 64-bit on
the nVidia site. Sorry for the post. Whoever posted the drivers to the
BetaNews site seems for the moment to have things totally messed up.

"Tony Sperling" <> wrote in message
news:%...
> After polishing my glasses, I'd say that it would seem you are right.
>
>
> Tony. . .
>
>
> "Maratonmannen" <> wrote in message
> news:630961C0-76E7-479F-A4BB-...
>> Am I missing something?
>> 91.33 are for 32-bit only, not x64.
>>
>> --
>> Asus P5WDG2-WS (i975X Express)
>> P4 3.73 GHz EE
>> RAPTOR 2x150 GB RAID 0 (ICH7R)
>> 2GB DDR2-800MHz@5-4-4-9-5
>> GeForce 7800GTX (91.31)
>> Samsung 24"
>> Enermax 660W 35A@+12V
>> 5049 3DMarks 06
>> LAN 100/100
>>
>>
>> "Tony Sperling" wrote:
>>
>> > I think this has been the case for some time now. I was under the
> impression
>> > that since having completed the 'Unified Driver' principle, they had
>> > all
>> > support shipped in the nForce driver and the installer decides what
> physical
>> > support is present and needs to have driver support installed?
>> >
>> > I visited the download page just now, and the xx.31 is still the
> official
>> > download - going to the Beta page, there is the xx.33. But no card
> specific
>> > drivers at all that I can see - only nForce!
>> >
>> > But then, perhaps we are seeing the effect of webserver cache updating
>> > differences across the world?
>> >
>> > Ah, yes - the link you posted otherwheres is indeed specifying a
> Forceware
>> > [Beta] driver, too
>> >
>> >
>> > Tony. . .
>> >
>> >
>> > "John Barnes" <> wrote in message
>> > newsD1EAC47-7145-4228-BCFA-...
>> > > Appears the drivers are the nForce drivers NOT the gForce video
> drivers
>> > the
>> > > description said they were.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > "John Barnes" <> wrote in message
>> > > news:5B2B257E-53D2-4A56-9D57-...
>> > > > Version 91.33 is out today. Guess the 91.31 out two days ago
>> > > > didn't
>> > work
>> > > > out too well. Charlie rules.
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>

There must be a gremlin inside NVidia's site.
Sometimes, on the very same day, I get redirected to different driver
versions (older an newer) depending on the hour of the day.
Carlos

"John Barnes" wrote:

> Does appear that even though labeled as for 64-bit the size matches the
> 32-bit ones on the nVidia beta site, and so far there is no new 64-bit on
> the nVidia site. Sorry for the post. Whoever posted the drivers to the
> BetaNews site seems for the moment to have things totally messed up.
>
> "Tony Sperling" <> wrote in message
> news:%...
> > After polishing my glasses, I'd say that it would seem you are right.
> >
> >
> > Tony. . .
> >
> >
> > "Maratonmannen" <> wrote in message
> > news:630961C0-76E7-479F-A4BB-...
> >> Am I missing something?
> >> 91.33 are for 32-bit only, not x64.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Asus P5WDG2-WS (i975X Express)
> >> P4 3.73 GHz EE
> >> RAPTOR 2x150 GB RAID 0 (ICH7R)
> >> 2GB DDR2-800MHz@5-4-4-9-5
> >> GeForce 7800GTX (91.31)
> >> Samsung 24"
> >> Enermax 660W 35A@+12V
> >> 5049 3DMarks 06
> >> LAN 100/100
> >>
> >>
> >> "Tony Sperling" wrote:
> >>
> >> > I think this has been the case for some time now. I was under the
> > impression
> >> > that since having completed the 'Unified Driver' principle, they had
> >> > all
> >> > support shipped in the nForce driver and the installer decides what
> > physical
> >> > support is present and needs to have driver support installed?
> >> >
> >> > I visited the download page just now, and the xx.31 is still the
> > official
> >> > download - going to the Beta page, there is the xx.33. But no card
> > specific
> >> > drivers at all that I can see - only nForce!
> >> >
> >> > But then, perhaps we are seeing the effect of webserver cache updating
> >> > differences across the world?
> >> >
> >> > Ah, yes - the link you posted otherwheres is indeed specifying a
> > Forceware
> >> > [Beta] driver, too
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Tony. . .
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > "John Barnes" <> wrote in message
> >> > newsD1EAC47-7145-4228-BCFA-...
> >> > > Appears the drivers are the nForce drivers NOT the gForce video
> > drivers
> >> > the
> >> > > description said they were.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > "John Barnes" <> wrote in message
> >> > > news:5B2B257E-53D2-4A56-9D57-...
> >> > > > Version 91.33 is out today. Guess the 91.31 out two days ago
> >> > > > didn't
> >> > work
> >> > > > out too well. Charlie rules.
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >
>