O.K. - I do not know why, just guessing that he would rather not have to
make changes to the internal logic of something that already works on other
systems. There is, after all, no such thing as a 'bug free' program, and
there will never be one. If you make such a change you expose the code to
millions of new potential bugs. A working project, the author at least has a
certain control over.
Your suggestion is quite in order - that might work as well, but my point is
that he would probably end up asking himself the same thing again when
trying to make the program install, since this apparently is a general
'porting' issue that is 'generally' overlooked in porting litterature. And
he may not have read a lot of that if he has good reason to believe it will
run as 32bit, which it might have, if it wasn't for the reg.
Tony. . .
"Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <> wrote in message
news:eQ$$...
> So why can't he have write an application then that reads BIOS information
> from System information utility? Its already their.
> --
> --
> Andre
> Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com
> Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
> Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
>
> "Tony Sperling" <> wrote in message
> news:%...
>> Sorry Andre, that may not help him - as I understand it he has written a
>> functioning program that already gets it's data from the reg., only on
>> 64bit it doesn't work. I guess this is yet another example of the
>> 'program files' re-direction that is taking place under 'wow64' or
>> 'syswow' or whatever.
>>
>> Unfortunately, I also cannot be very helpfull unless pointing a somewhat
>> wavering finger at the 'Windows Installler'. Developer Information about
>> that would possibly be helpful.
>>
>> OShell77, try programming NG's for your language, or windows specific
>> developer groups. You'll find these people here as well, but 90% of the
>> issues are general user stuff.
>>
>>
>> Tony. . .
>>
>>
>> "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <> wrote in message
>> news:uMR%...
>>> Don't know about Registry Key, but you should be able to find the BIOS
>>> information under System Information > System Summary (Start > All
>>> Programs
>>> > Accessories > System Tools > System Information > System Summary >
>>> > BIOS
>>> Version/Date.
>>> --
>>> --
>>> Andre
>>> Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com
>>> Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
>>> Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
>>> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
>>>
>>> "OShell77" <> wrote in message
>>> news:4F28FDE2-CF48-48A6-ADB0-...
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I have an application that reads BIOS data from the registry. On 32-bit
>>>> Windows, BIOS data (version, date, manufacturer) can be found under
>>>> registry
>>>> key HKLM\HARDWARE\DESCRIPTION\System. However, On Windows Server 2003
>>>> Enterprise x64 Edition SP1, the BIOS information is not found under
>>>> that
>>>> registry key. I found registry key
>>>> HKLM\HARDWARE\DESCRIPTION\System\BIOS but
>>>> it does not contain any BIOS data. Is there any other registry key on
>>>> Win
>>>> Server 2003 x64 where BIOS version, date, manufacturer can be found?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>