Dennis, you need to start a blog and blog this good stuff.

Might I
recommend,
http://spaces.msn.com ?
--
--
Andre
Extended64 |
http://www.extended64.com
Blog |
http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
FAQ for MS AntiSpy
http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
"Dennis Pack" <> wrote in message
news:...
> In comparing encoding times with x86 and x64 were performed on a AMD 3200+
> 32-bit machine and a FX51 64-but machine which indicated a 28% reduction
> in overall time. This was actually comparing apples and oranges.
>
> The latest results were performed on an AMD 4400x2 dual boot system with
> the same programs installed on each operating systems, data files stored
> in a separate partition.
>
> The first test was to convert a 7.26G DVD movie to a 714MB file using
> FairUse Wizard v2.1a, haven't tested v2.4 yet. Time and temperatures were
> the same, CPU usage was 5% less with x64 and PF was 80MB higher with x64.
>
> The second test was capturing a 40 minute VCR clip using a Leadtek TV2000
> XP expert card with CyberLink Power Director 5 and creating a DVD of the
> clip. Time and temperatures were the same, didn't record CPU or PF data.
>
> FairUse Wizard and Power Director 5 are 32-bit programs, drivers for the
> Leadtek TV2000 XP expert were the latest x86 drivers and the latest x64
> beta drivers.
>
> With the performance being the same on x86 & x64 for 32-bit programs is an
> indication that the emulation being performed doesn't slow the programs
> function. A performance increase should be noted when 64-bit programs are
> available.
>
>
>
>