Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Windows 64bit > Comparing x86 to x64.

Reply
Thread Tools

Comparing x86 to x64.

 
 
Dennis Pack
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      01-29-2006
In comparing encoding times with x86 and x64 were performed on a AMD 3200+
32-bit machine and a FX51 64-but machine which indicated a 28% reduction in
overall time. This was actually comparing apples and oranges.

The latest results were performed on an AMD 4400x2 dual boot system with the
same programs installed on each operating systems, data files stored in a
separate partition.

The first test was to convert a 7.26G DVD movie to a 714MB file using
FairUse Wizard v2.1a, haven't tested v2.4 yet. Time and temperatures were
the same, CPU usage was 5% less with x64 and PF was 80MB higher with x64.

The second test was capturing a 40 minute VCR clip using a Leadtek TV2000 XP
expert card with CyberLink Power Director 5 and creating a DVD of the clip.
Time and temperatures were the same, didn't record CPU or PF data.

FairUse Wizard and Power Director 5 are 32-bit programs, drivers for the
Leadtek TV2000 XP expert were the latest x86 drivers and the latest x64 beta
drivers.

With the performance being the same on x86 & x64 for 32-bit programs is an
indication that the emulation being performed doesn't slow the programs
function. A performance increase should be noted when 64-bit programs are
available.




 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Andre Da Costa
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      01-29-2006
Dennis, you need to start a blog and blog this good stuff. Might I
recommend, http://spaces.msn.com ?
--
--
Andre
Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
"Dennis Pack" <> wrote in message
news:...
> In comparing encoding times with x86 and x64 were performed on a AMD 3200+
> 32-bit machine and a FX51 64-but machine which indicated a 28% reduction
> in overall time. This was actually comparing apples and oranges.
>
> The latest results were performed on an AMD 4400x2 dual boot system with
> the same programs installed on each operating systems, data files stored
> in a separate partition.
>
> The first test was to convert a 7.26G DVD movie to a 714MB file using
> FairUse Wizard v2.1a, haven't tested v2.4 yet. Time and temperatures were
> the same, CPU usage was 5% less with x64 and PF was 80MB higher with x64.
>
> The second test was capturing a 40 minute VCR clip using a Leadtek TV2000
> XP expert card with CyberLink Power Director 5 and creating a DVD of the
> clip. Time and temperatures were the same, didn't record CPU or PF data.
>
> FairUse Wizard and Power Director 5 are 32-bit programs, drivers for the
> Leadtek TV2000 XP expert were the latest x86 drivers and the latest x64
> beta drivers.
>
> With the performance being the same on x86 & x64 for 32-bit programs is an
> indication that the emulation being performed doesn't slow the programs
> function. A performance increase should be noted when 64-bit programs are
> available.
>
>
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
x64 vs x86.. surprising results in performance (x86 better)? markm75 Windows 64bit 7 01-09-2008 06:41 PM
Why is there an x86 emu if a processor is x86-64? =?Utf-8?B?RWxsaW90IEh1ZGdpbnM=?= Windows 64bit 4 07-23-2006 11:52 PM
Re: Comparing x86 to x64. Rick Windows 64bit 1 01-31-2006 03:54 AM
x86 Mac Laptop and x86 iMac now available Daniel NZ Computing 11 01-17-2006 12:11 PM
Is there a .NET or C# to native x86 compiler? Andy Chau ASP .Net 11 01-02-2004 06:45 PM



Advertisments
 



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57