«

I am apologizing for mistake on my part, not on Microsoft's work.
--
Andre
Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm

"Mike Brannigan [MSFT]" <> wrote in message
news:...
> "Andre Da Costa" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>> No problem, the Beta 2 naming was a bit misleading, sorry for that. Its
>> just that most of don't realize 5219 is essentially 5112 on the beta 2
>> branch.
>> --
>> Andre
>
> Andre,
>
> It is not your place to apologise for any work we are doing - since you
> are not a Microsoft employee.
> We have no apology to make for the work we are doing on the branding of
> the releases post Beta 1.
> It is also incorrect to say "5219 is essentially 5112 on the beta 2
> branch".
> Build 5219 is significantly different from the 5112 (Beta 1) build. It is
> a continuation of the work that commenced after we forked the build tree
> for the Beta 1 release on the main development path. I would suggest you
> refrain from commenting on our internal build processes.
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Mike
> --
> Mike Brannigan [Microsoft]
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights
>
> Please note I cannot respond to e-mailed questions, please use these
> newsgroups
>
> "Andre Da Costa" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>> No problem, the Beta 2 naming was a bit misleading, sorry for that. Its
>> just that most of don't realize 5219 is essentially 5112 on the beta 2
>> branch.
>> --
>> Andre
>> Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
>> Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
>> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
>> FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
>> "Carlos" <> wrote in message
>> news:3E965651-1D8F-427A-A5CA-...
>>> Andre:
>>> Thanks for your reply.
>>> It was more helpful than Charlie's one.
>>> I had taken the "beta 2" version from your msn space so I apologize to
>>> Charlie if it is not beta 1.
>>> Anyway 2.8 gigs seems to me a big jump from WinXP to Windows Vista.
>>> Carlos
>>>
>>> "Andre Da Costa" wrote:
>>>
>>>> More drivers have been included for x86 version, it will continue grow
>>>> to
>>>> support the wide range of hardware over the life of the beta. Here is
>>>> the
>>>> newsgroup to post Vista questions Carlos:
>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvist...f-bb6ecc143dc1
>>>> --
>>>> Andre
>>>> Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
>>>> Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
>>>> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
>>>> FAQ for MS AntiSpy
>>>> http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
>>>> "Carlos" <> wrote in message
>>>> news:5171D745-E782-4181-9E38-...
>>>> > Charlie:
>>>> > I have, and don't want to have, access to build 5219.
>>>> > I was just being curious about its size.
>>>> > From one version (WinXP x86) to another (Windows Vista) we jump form
>>>> > 600
>>>> > MB
>>>> > to 2.7 gisgs.
>>>> > What is MS putting in there?
>>>> > If that's top secret, well... Let it go then.
>>>> > Regards.
>>>> > Carlos
>>>> >
>>>> > "Charlie Russel - MVP" wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> If you have legal access to build 5219, you have a venue to ask
>>>> >> questions
>>>> >> about it. I suggest that you ask there. (and it is NOT beta 2.)
>>>> >>
>>>> >> --
>>>> >> Charlie.
>>>> >> http://msmvps.com/xperts64
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Carlos wrote:
>>>> >> > Windows Vista beta 2 (build 5219) is around 2.8 gigabytes big.
>>>> >> > Does it include both x86 and x64 versions?
>>>> >> > Are there MUI packages available?
>>>> >> > Carlos
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>