Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Windows 64bit > Defrag - registry cleaner ?

Reply
Thread Tools

Defrag - registry cleaner ?

 
 
=?Utf-8?B?Qm9uZ2VyTWFu?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-14-2005
Anyone know of any good 3rd party defraggers that support xp64? Or how about
a good registry cleaner?

I've have always been told not to use the defrag that comes with windows,
could anyone shed some light on this? Aren't defrag programs all the same
basically, with just different looks?
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Andre Da Costa [Extended64]
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-14-2005
I found one:
http://www.tweaknow.com/RegCleanerPro.html

The Registry is a heart and soul of any Windows system. It contains
information that controls how your Windows appears and how it behaves. Most
applications today use registry to store configuration and other important
data. When you install an application, a new registry entries will be
created. This entries will automatically be deleted when you uninstall the
application. Unfortunately, it is not always work that way. Sometimes, you
will find that some applications fail to remove their own registry entries.
This entry will become obsolete.
After a long period, after installing and uninstalling a lot number of
applications, your Windows registry will contain a large number of obsolete
entries. This will significantly increase the registry size and thus will
slowdown your computer, because Windows will need more time to load, search,
and read data from registry.

To keep your computer in top performance, it is recommended to periodically
clean your Windows registry.
--
Andre
Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
"BongerMan" <> wrote in message
news:C220F193-C5ED-4C14-858D-...
> Anyone know of any good 3rd party defraggers that support xp64? Or how
> about
> a good registry cleaner?
>
> I've have always been told not to use the defrag that comes with windows,
> could anyone shed some light on this? Aren't defrag programs all the same
> basically, with just different looks?



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Tony Sperling
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-14-2005
There is a OODefrag on PlanetAMD64, comes along with favorable wording.
Don't use it myself as I am reasonably happy with the MS that is built in.
No reason I can think of for not using it, unless you have special needs
regarding configurability, sorting and stuff. Also, the default is not any
speed demon, but whatever you chose I think you'll find it takes too long.

Of course, they are all different in some aspects, but they are doing the
same work and to my knowledge they are all built around recursive algorithms
and the things you can do with that sort would be limited. As an included
item, MS is not likely to put 1000 extra man-hours into polishing something
that, after all, is working.

Tony. . .



"BongerMan" <> wrote in message
news:C220F193-C5ED-4C14-858D-...
> Anyone know of any good 3rd party defraggers that support xp64? Or how
> about
> a good registry cleaner?
>
> I've have always been told not to use the defrag that comes with windows,
> could anyone shed some light on this? Aren't defrag programs all the same
> basically, with just different looks?



 
Reply With Quote
 
Jean-Baptiste Faure
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-14-2005
I'm using O&O Defrag for x64, and I can confirm that it works fine under
x64.

"Tony Sperling" <> wrote in message
news:...
> There is a OODefrag on PlanetAMD64, comes along with favorable wording.
> Don't use it myself as I am reasonably happy with the MS that is built in.
> No reason I can think of for not using it, unless you have special needs
> regarding configurability, sorting and stuff. Also, the default is not any
> speed demon, but whatever you chose I think you'll find it takes too long.
>
> Of course, they are all different in some aspects, but they are doing the
> same work and to my knowledge they are all built around recursive
> algorithms and the things you can do with that sort would be limited. As
> an included item, MS is not likely to put 1000 extra man-hours into
> polishing something that, after all, is working.
>
> Tony. . .
>
>
>
> "BongerMan" <> wrote in message
> news:C220F193-C5ED-4C14-858D-...
>> Anyone know of any good 3rd party defraggers that support xp64? Or how
>> about
>> a good registry cleaner?
>>
>> I've have always been told not to use the defrag that comes with windows,
>> could anyone shed some light on this? Aren't defrag programs all the
>> same
>> basically, with just different looks?

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Al Edlund
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-14-2005
I'm very happy with the oodefrag,
al

"Tony Sperling" <> wrote in message
news:...
> There is a OODefrag on PlanetAMD64, comes along with favorable wording.
> Don't use it myself as I am reasonably happy with the MS that is built in.
> No reason I can think of for not using it, unless you have special needs
> regarding configurability, sorting and stuff. Also, the default is not any
> speed demon, but whatever you chose I think you'll find it takes too long.
>
> Of course, they are all different in some aspects, but they are doing the
> same work and to my knowledge they are all built around recursive
> algorithms and the things you can do with that sort would be limited. As
> an included item, MS is not likely to put 1000 extra man-hours into
> polishing something that, after all, is working.
>
> Tony. . .
>
>
>
> "BongerMan" <> wrote in message
> news:C220F193-C5ED-4C14-858D-...
>> Anyone know of any good 3rd party defraggers that support xp64? Or how
>> about
>> a good registry cleaner?
>>
>> I've have always been told not to use the defrag that comes with windows,
>> could anyone shed some light on this? Aren't defrag programs all the
>> same
>> basically, with just different looks?

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
zekolas
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-14-2005
BongerMan wrote:
> Anyone know of any good 3rd party defraggers that support xp64? Or how about
> a good registry cleaner?
>
> I've have always been told not to use the defrag that comes with windows,
> could anyone shed some light on this? Aren't defrag programs all the same
> basically, with just different looks?



As far as disk defragmenter programs, I wouldn't bother with 3rd party
tools. Google around and you will see 3rd party defragmenters vs windows
defragmenter only improves performace about 1-2% in disk access, what is
really not noticable. I mean can you tell that it takes windows 12
seconds to load vs 12.7 seconds?
 
Reply With Quote
 
William Walker
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-14-2005

"zekolas" <> wrote in message
news:...
> BongerMan wrote:
>> Anyone know of any good 3rd party defraggers that support xp64? Or how
>> about a good registry cleaner?
>>
>> I've have always been told not to use the defrag that comes with windows,
>> could anyone shed some light on this? Aren't defrag programs all the
>> same basically, with just different looks?

>
>
> As far as disk defragmenter programs, I wouldn't bother with 3rd party
> tools. Google around and you will see 3rd party defragmenters vs windows
> defragmenter only improves performace about 1-2% in disk access, what is
> really not noticable. I mean can you tell that it takes windows 12 seconds
> to load vs 12.7 seconds?


Does the inbuilt defrag software from Microsoft defrag pagefiles? Or are
3rd party defrag software better at doing that?

William Walker

 
Reply With Quote
 
Bruce Chambers
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-15-2005
BongerMan wrote:
> Anyone know of any good 3rd party defraggers that support xp64?



No need, the built-in defragger is perfectly adequate for most purposes.


> Or how about
> a good registry cleaner?
>



No such thing, to the best of my knowledge. There's certainly no need
to ever use one on WinXP.

What specific problem are you experiencing that you *know* beyond
all reasonable doubt will be fixed by using a registry cleaner? If you
do have a problem that is rooted in the registry, it would be far better
to simply edit (after backing up, of course) only the specific key(s)
and/or value(s) that are causing the problem. Why use a shotgun when a
scalpel will do the job? Additionally, the manually changing of one or
two registry entries is far less likely to have the dire consequences of
allowing an automated product to make multiple changes simultaneously.

The registry contains all of the operating system's "knowledge" of
the computer's hardware devices, installed software, the location of the
device drivers, and the computer's configuration. A misstep in the
registry can have severe consequences. One should not even turning
loose a poorly understood automated "cleaner," unless he is fully
confident that he knows *exactly* what is going to happen as a result of
each and every change. Having seen the results of inexperienced people
using automated registry "cleaners," I can only advise all but the most
experienced computer technicians (and/or hobbyists) to avoid them all.
Experience has shown me that such tools simply are not safe in the hands
of the inexperienced user.

The only thing needed to safely clean your registry is knowledge
and Regedit.exe. If you lack the knowledge and experience to maintain
your registry by yourself, then you also lack the knowledge and
experience to safely configure and use any automated registry cleaner,
no matter how safe they claim to be.

Further, no one has ever demonstrated, to my satisfaction, that the
use of an automated registry cleaner, particularly by an untrained,
inexperienced computer user, does any real good. There's certainly been
no empirical evidence offered to demonstrate that the use of such
products to "clean" WinXP's registry improves a computer's performance
or stability.

I always use Regedit.exe. I trust my own experience and judgment
far more than I would any automated registry cleaner. I strongly
encourage others to acquire the knowledge, as well.


> I've have always been told not to use the defrag that comes with windows,
> could anyone shed some light on this?



You'll have to ask whomever offered that absurd advice for his/her reasons.




--

Bruce Chambers

Help us help you:
http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don't ever count on having
both at once. - RAH
 
Reply With Quote
 
Bruce Chambers
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-15-2005
Andre Da Costa [Extended64] wrote:

> After a long period, after installing and uninstalling a lot number of
> applications, your Windows registry will contain a large number of obsolete
> entries. This will significantly increase the registry size and thus will
> slowdown your computer, because Windows will need more time to load, search,
> and read data from registry.
>


Please provide independent laboratory documentation to support that claim.



> To keep your computer in top performance, it is recommended to periodically
> clean your Windows registry.


Only by people who are selling registry cleaners, or who don't know any
better.


--

Bruce Chambers

Help us help you:
http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don't ever count on having
both at once. - RAH
 
Reply With Quote
 
Tony Sperling
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      09-15-2005

"William Walker" <> wrote in message
news:...
>
> "zekolas" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>> BongerMan wrote:
>>> Anyone know of any good 3rd party defraggers that support xp64? Or how
>>> about a good registry cleaner?
>>>
>>> I've have always been told not to use the defrag that comes with
>>> windows, could anyone shed some light on this? Aren't defrag programs
>>> all the same basically, with just different looks?

>>
>>
>> As far as disk defragmenter programs, I wouldn't bother with 3rd party
>> tools. Google around and you will see 3rd party defragmenters vs windows
>> defragmenter only improves performace about 1-2% in disk access, what is
>> really not noticable. I mean can you tell that it takes windows 12
>> seconds to load vs 12.7 seconds?

>
> Does the inbuilt defrag software from Microsoft defrag pagefiles? Or are
> 3rd party defrag software better at doing that?


No, it does not. I can also not think of any reason to use such a facility,
as all space inside the file that is not currently used by any running
process, will be regarded as 'empty', and overwritten - thus,
defragmentation is of no consequence other than hypothetically. Note, as
well, that no data is ever stored in the pagefile - only code. Much more
serious is the inabillity to move system files and to move and sort
directories - that might well be a useful feature, and of a kind you'll have
to pay for.

Tony. . .



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
REGISTRY CLEANER Phil B Computer Support 4 12-18-2003 08:44 PM
Thought-free registry cleaner wanted SlowwHand Computer Support 24 12-18-2003 04:44 AM
registry cleaner Bigfred Computer Support 3 10-18-2003 07:37 PM
What's the BEST Registry Cleaner? Solar^ Computer Support 13 09-01-2003 11:01 PM
Is X-Cleaner Legit? I think it may have wiped my registry. What do i do? Look in my eyes and you'll find me Computer Support 10 08-31-2003 03:15 AM



Advertisments
 



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57