Hello Colin,
Are you using the 32-bit or the 64-bit browser or both?
Do you have the case number?
That may not be an ActiveX issue, that may be an IE issue with the page or
with the versions supplied to the page.
Thanks,
Darrell Gorter[MSFT]
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights
--------------------
<From: "Colin Nowell" <>
<References: <uq$>
<>
<#>
<S$HK4z$>
<Subject: Re: activex in 64 bit
<Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:07:37 +0100
<Lines: 80
<X-Priority: 3
<X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
<X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.3790.1830
<X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.1830
<X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
<X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0535-3, 02/09/2005), Outbound message
<X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
<Message-ID: <u$>
<Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general
<NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.152.177.171
<Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFT NGP09.phx.gbl
<Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general:16519
<X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general
<
<Well, I'd say that the fact that the "Microsoft Genuine Advantage
Programme"
<doesn't work (and I have an open ticket with MS Support about it) and is
<"broke" when running x64 Windows ("Operating System not supported") is a
<pretty darn good reason....
<
<Colin
<
<""Darrell Gorter[MSFT]"" <> wrote in message
<news:S$HK4z$...
<> Hello John,
<> I fail to see what point you are trying to make here.
<> 64-bit Active-X controls work in the 64-bit browser.
<> 32-bit Active-X controls work in the 32-bit browser.
<> Since most existing Active-X controls today are 32-bit, the default
<> browser
<> is 32-bit, however links exist to the 64-bit broswer.
<> This gives users the best experience today while 64-bit Active-X controls
<> are being generated.
<> How is this letting 64-bit users down?
<> Thanks,
<> Darrell Gorter[MSFT]
<>
<> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights
<> --------------------
<> <From: "John Barnes" <>
<> <References: <uq$>
<> <>
<> <Subject: Re: activex in 64 bit
<> <Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 08:09:17 -0700
<> <Lines: 28
<> <X-Priority: 3
<> <X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
<> <X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670
<> <X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670
<> <X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
<> <Message-ID: <#>
<> <Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general
<> <NNTP-Posting-Host: 0-1pool150-228.nas8.spokane1.wa.us.da.qwest.net
<> 67.0.150.228
<> <Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFT NGP12.phx.gbl
<> <Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general:16505
<> <X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general
<> <
<> <Another place where Microsoft has let 64-bitters down. They write their
<> own
<> <ActiveX for a number of processes. At least according to the properties
<> <dialog.
<> <
<> <
<> <"Andre Da Costa" <> wrote in message
<> <news:...
<> <> This one is in the hands of the industry, a lot of companies and
<> content
<> <> based technologies such as Flash Player are not yet supported, not
<> until
<> <> these technologies are developed and deployed on IE 64-Bit will you
see
<> <> 64-Bit ActiveX Controls start being developed for that particular
<> version
<> <> of the browser. Just my opinion.
<> <> --
<> <> Andre
<> <> Extended64 |
http://www.extended64.com
<> <> Blog |
http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
<> <>
http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
<> <> FAQ for MS AntiSpy
<>
http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
<> <> "Kue2" <> wrote in message
<> <> news:uq$...
<> <>> any word on when it will be supported in 64 bit?
<> <>>
<> <>> --
<> <>> Hugh
<> <>>
<> <>
<> <
<> <
<> <
<>
<
<
<