Well, we are trying to do as little rewriting as possible. It's true that
our programs are getting the "Program Files (x86)" directory if we manually
install them, but our original setup for Win2k and XP are set for "Program
Files". When you use these files for the unattended install, the path is
hard coded, so the switch never happens.
"zekolas" wrote:
> Well assumeing nearly 100% of the software out there is still 32 bit why
> not just change the "C:\Program Files" path to "C:\Program Files (x86)"?
> it shouldn't be that hard or am I missing something? I set up unattended
> installs all the time.
>
> Stack wrote:
> > At my company, we have a custom set of scripts for installing and setting up
> > Windows. We have some Windows XP x64 workstations that we would like to add
> > to this process. With one exception, all of our applications are 32-bit.
> >
> > One problem we have run into is with Program Files. All of our applications
> > are installed with InstallShield and the "-r" and "-s" options. These create
> > .iss files which are then used for unattended installations. The problem is
> > that the hard coded path in these files is "C:\Program Files".
> >
> > Is this going to cause a problem? Can I install 32-bit applications into
> > the 64-bit Program Files directory? I've been searching for a while now and
> > have not received a definate yes/no answer.
>
|