L2TP/PPTP

Dear Group,

T2TP is encrypted if you use IPSEC.
PPTP is encrypted with Microsoft Encryption.

Can anyone explain to use when you use L2TP or PPTP ? What are the benifits
of each other ?

Is there anyware a comparison

Cheers,
Shiva

Shiva

> L2TP is encrypted if you use IPSEC.
> PPTP is encrypted with Microsoft Encryption.
>
> Can anyone explain to use when you use L2TP or PPTP ? What are the
benifits
> of each other ?

L2TP offer stronger security, but is also resource intensive and supported
only by Windows 2000 or later clients.

PPTP works with Windows 95 and later and can offer a better throughput
and/or more tunnels with the same hardware configuration.

Regards,
Corrado

Corrado Labinaz

Though pptp can be very secure if configured correctly and a complex password is used
with MSCAPv2, l2tp is more secure for a number of reasons. The actual authentication
exchange is not encrypted [other than that provided by the protocol itself] in pptp
while it is in l2tp. L2tp uses a more robust encryption method and probably one of
the biggest advantages is it requires certificate machine authentication in addition
to user authentication while pptp only requires user authentication for initial
connection. That means if a hacker knows the name/password for a vpn user it is no
good to them on a computer without a trusted certificate for machine authentication.
While either can be configured on Windows computers [W9X requires client upgrade],
pptp is generally easier to set up than l2tp as is will not work through NAT routers
and requires a Certificate Authority to issue machine certificates [easy enough to do
though]. There is a NAT-T update that is supposed to work through NAT routers. See
the link below for excellent and easy to read white paper on the subject. --- Steve

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserv...w/vpnover.mspx

"Shiva" <> wrote in message news:hxC2c.2701$...
> Dear Group,
>
> T2TP is encrypted if you use IPSEC.
> PPTP is encrypted with Microsoft Encryption.
>
> Can anyone explain to use when you use L2TP or PPTP ? What are the benifits
> of each other ?
>
> Is there anyware a comparison
>
> Cheers,
> Shiva
>
>

Steven L Umbach

Clear and concise and answered a couple of nagging doubts for me.

Thanks Steve.


On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 17:55:47 GMT, "Steven L Umbach"
<> wrote:

>Though pptp can be very secure if configured correctly and a complex password is used
>with MSCAPv2, l2tp is more secure for a number of reasons. The actual authentication
>exchange is not encrypted [other than that provided by the protocol itself] in pptp
>while it is in l2tp. L2tp uses a more robust encryption method and probably one of
>the biggest advantages is it requires certificate machine authentication in addition
>to user authentication while pptp only requires user authentication for initial
>connection. That means if a hacker knows the name/password for a vpn user it is no
>good to them on a computer without a trusted certificate for machine authentication.
>While either can be configured on Windows computers [W9X requires client upgrade],
>pptp is generally easier to set up than l2tp as is will not work through NAT routers
>and requires a Certificate Authority to issue machine certificates [easy enough to do
>though]. There is a NAT-T update that is supposed to work through NAT routers. See
>the link below for excellent and easy to read white paper on the subject. --- Steve
>
>http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserv...w/vpnover.mspx
>
>"Shiva" <> wrote in message news:hxC2c.2701$...
>> Dear Group,
>>
>> T2TP is encrypted if you use IPSEC.
>> PPTP is encrypted with Microsoft Encryption.
>>
>> Can anyone explain to use when you use L2TP or PPTP ? What are the benifits
>> of each other ?
>>
>> Is there anyware a comparison
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Shiva
>>
>>
>

================================
My Hero:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/30/index.html
(remove vroomfondle to email me)
================================

Marlin Munrow

Thanks, glad to help. I think the white paper is excellent as lot of the Windows 2003
documentation from Microsoft seems to be. --- Steve


"Marlin Munrow" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Clear and concise and answered a couple of nagging doubts for me.
>
> Thanks Steve.
>
>
> On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 17:55:47 GMT, "Steven L Umbach"
> <> wrote:
>
> >Though pptp can be very secure if configured correctly and a complex password is
used
> >with MSCAPv2, l2tp is more secure for a number of reasons. The actual
authentication
> >exchange is not encrypted [other than that provided by the protocol itself] in
pptp
> >while it is in l2tp. L2tp uses a more robust encryption method and probably one of
> >the biggest advantages is it requires certificate machine authentication in
addition
> >to user authentication while pptp only requires user authentication for initial
> >connection. That means if a hacker knows the name/password for a vpn user it is no
> >good to them on a computer without a trusted certificate for machine
authentication.
> >While either can be configured on Windows computers [W9X requires client upgrade],
> >pptp is generally easier to set up than l2tp as is will not work through NAT
routers
> >and requires a Certificate Authority to issue machine certificates [easy enough to
do
> >though]. There is a NAT-T update that is supposed to work through NAT routers. See
> >the link below for excellent and easy to read white paper on the subject. ---
Steve
> >
> >http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserv...w/vpnover.mspx
> >
> >"Shiva" <> wrote in message
news:hxC2c.2701$...
> >> Dear Group,
> >>
> >> T2TP is encrypted if you use IPSEC.
> >> PPTP is encrypted with Microsoft Encryption.
> >>
> >> Can anyone explain to use when you use L2TP or PPTP ? What are the benifits
> >> of each other ?
> >>
> >> Is there anyware a comparison
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Shiva
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> ================================
> My Hero:
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/30/index.html
> (remove vroomfondle to email me)
> ================================

Steven L Umbach

2 true
thanks for your continued helpful and honest input despite the
trolls.

I O U. 20% of my MCSE 2003


On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 20:14:36 GMT, "Steven L Umbach"
<> wrote:

>Thanks, glad to help. I think the white paper is excellent as lot of the Windows 2003
>documentation from Microsoft seems to be. --- Steve
>
>
>"Marlin Munrow" <> wrote in message
>news:.. .
>> Clear and concise and answered a couple of nagging doubts for me.
>>
>> Thanks Steve.
<<SNIP>>
================================
My Hero:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/30/index.html
(remove vroomfondle to email me)
================================

Marlin Munrow