Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Windows 64bit > Windows Server 2003 x86 64-bit NTBackup Failure Issue

Reply
Thread Tools

Windows Server 2003 x86 64-bit NTBackup Failure Issue

 
 
SMF
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-21-2005
Called MSFT and they say that it is a known issue with the MSDE VS writer.
Must stop SQL before we run NTBackup for now.

Thanks all

"Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:%23%(E-Mail Removed)...
> Sorry, SMF, I really can't help on this one, I wish I could. The only
> thing I know about Volume Shadow Copy is that it creates multiple versions
> of a source file that is edited by multiple users. Its possible that the
> service has become corrupted and you need to do a repair install of Server
> 2003 x64 or disable the service (which wouldn't make sense if you use it).
> --
> Andre
> Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
> Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
> FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
>
> "SMF" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Whenever we try to run a System State backup, those are the errors that
>> are given.
>>
>> "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> Is there a question to go with this? Did you experience a crash with
>>> Volume Shadow on Server 2003 x64?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Andre
>>> Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
>>> Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
>>> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
>>> FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
>>>
>>> "SMF" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>> http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;828481
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Backup Log Report:
>>>>
>>>> Backup Status
>>>>
>>>> Operation: Backup
>>>>
>>>> Active backup destination: File
>>>>
>>>> Media name: "Backup_SystemState.bkf created 6/20/2005 at 8:02 PM"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Volume shadow copy creation: Attempt 1.
>>>>
>>>> "MSDEWriter" has reported an error 0x800423f4. This is part of System
>>>> State. The backup cannot continue.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Error returned while creating the volume shadow copy:800423f4
>>>>
>>>> Aborting Backup.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Event Log Errors:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> VSS Error:
>>>>
>>>> Event ID: 6008
>>>>
>>>> Sqllib error: Failed to create VDS object. hr = 0x80040154.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> VSS Error:
>>>>
>>>> Event ID: 20
>>>>
>>>> Volume Shadow Copy Service error: A critical component required by the
>>>> Volume Shadow Copy service is not registered. This might happened if
>>>> an error occurred during Windows setup or during installation of a
>>>> Shadow Copy provider. The error returned from CoCreateInstance on
>>>> class with CLSID {40700425-0080-11d2-851f-00c04fc21759} and Name
>>>> MSSQL_ClientVirtualDeviceSet is [0x80040154].
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>

>>
>>

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Andre Da Costa [Extended64]
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-21-2005
I agree.
--
Andre
Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm

"Wayne Wastier" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>I guess the thing that SMF is wondering about is if its a Server 2003 x64
>>issue.
>> --

>
> Yes, I thought so too. But people in the server newsgroups should be more
> knowledgeable about these matters, don't you think?
>
> Wayne
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Andre Da Costa [Extended64]
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-21-2005
Thanks for the update.
--
Andre
Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm

"SMF" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
> Called MSFT and they say that it is a known issue with the MSDE VS writer.
> Must stop SQL before we run NTBackup for now.
>
> Thanks all
>
> "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:%23%(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Sorry, SMF, I really can't help on this one, I wish I could. The only
>> thing I know about Volume Shadow Copy is that it creates multiple
>> versions of a source file that is edited by multiple users. Its possible
>> that the service has become corrupted and you need to do a repair install
>> of Server 2003 x64 or disable the service (which wouldn't make sense if
>> you use it).
>> --
>> Andre
>> Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
>> Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
>> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
>> FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
>>
>> "SMF" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> Whenever we try to run a System State backup, those are the errors that
>>> are given.
>>>
>>> "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>> Is there a question to go with this? Did you experience a crash with
>>>> Volume Shadow on Server 2003 x64?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Andre
>>>> Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
>>>> Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
>>>> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
>>>> FAQ for MS AntiSpy
>>>> http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
>>>>
>>>> "SMF" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>>> http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;828481
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Backup Log Report:
>>>>>
>>>>> Backup Status
>>>>>
>>>>> Operation: Backup
>>>>>
>>>>> Active backup destination: File
>>>>>
>>>>> Media name: "Backup_SystemState.bkf created 6/20/2005 at 8:02 PM"
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Volume shadow copy creation: Attempt 1.
>>>>>
>>>>> "MSDEWriter" has reported an error 0x800423f4. This is part of System
>>>>> State. The backup cannot continue.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Error returned while creating the volume shadow copy:800423f4
>>>>>
>>>>> Aborting Backup.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Event Log Errors:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> VSS Error:
>>>>>
>>>>> Event ID: 6008
>>>>>
>>>>> Sqllib error: Failed to create VDS object. hr = 0x80040154.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> VSS Error:
>>>>>
>>>>> Event ID: 20
>>>>>
>>>>> Volume Shadow Copy Service error: A critical component required by the
>>>>> Volume Shadow Copy service is not registered. This might happened if
>>>>> an error occurred during Windows setup or during installation of a
>>>>> Shadow Copy provider. The error returned from CoCreateInstance on
>>>>> class with CLSID {40700425-0080-11d2-851f-00c04fc21759} and Name
>>>>> MSSQL_ClientVirtualDeviceSet is [0x80040154].
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>

>>
>>

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Wayne Wastier
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-21-2005

"Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>I have suggested this from a long time ago in CPP group, a question like
>this easily gets lost in the Client group.
> --
> Andre


Maybe I need to post this in the tech-beta newsgroup? Will give it a shot
and see if it takes.


Wayne


 
Reply With Quote
 
Darrell Gorter[MSFT]
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-21-2005
Hello,
This has been proposed a number of times. It's still under discussion.
Thanks,
Darrell Gorter[MSFT]

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights
--------------------
<From: "Wayne Wastier" <(E-Mail Removed)>
<References: <(E-Mail Removed)>
<(E-Mail Removed)>
<uU2gY$(E-Mail Removed)>
<(E-Mail Removed)>
<Subject: Re: Windows Server 2003 x86 64-bit NTBackup Failure Issue
<Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:53:25 -0500
<Lines: 15
<X-Priority: 3
<X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
<X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527
<X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527
<X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
<Message-ID: <(E-Mail Removed)>
<Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general
<NNTP-Posting-Host: 66-169-103-95.dhcp.ftwo.tx.charter.com 66.169.103.95
<Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!tk2msft ngp13.phx.gbl
<Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general:8223
<X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general
<
<
<"Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
<news:(E-Mail Removed)...
<>I have suggested this from a long time ago in CPP group, a question like
<>this easily gets lost in the Client group.
<> --
<> Andre
<
<Maybe I need to post this in the tech-beta newsgroup? Will give it a shot
<and see if it takes.
<
<
<Wayne
<
<
<

 
Reply With Quote
 
Wayne Wastier
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-21-2005

""Darrell Gorter[MSFT]"" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:Gv$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hello,
> This has been proposed a number of times. It's still under discussion.
> Thanks,
> Darrell Gorter[MSFT]
>


Thank you too Darrell. I hope the decision maker(s) decide to do it.
Especially when Longhorn Home Server makes the scene.

Wayne


 
Reply With Quote
 
Andre Da Costa [Extended64]
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-21-2005
I think its about time Microsoft introduces one of that and call it an
Appliance server for managing your stove to your TV.
--
Andre
Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
FAQ for MS AntiSpy http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm

"Wayne Wastier" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> ""Darrell Gorter[MSFT]"" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:Gv$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Hello,
>> This has been proposed a number of times. It's still under discussion.
>> Thanks,
>> Darrell Gorter[MSFT]
>>

>
> Thank you too Darrell. I hope the decision maker(s) decide to do it.
> Especially when Longhorn Home Server makes the scene.
>
> Wayne
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Charlie Russel - MVP
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-22-2005
Don't hold your breath.

Personally, I think that the need for a 64-bit newsgroup will be transient.
And it's a lot harder to get rid of a NG than it is to create it.


--
Charlie.
http://www.msmvps.com/xperts64/


"Darrell Gorter[MSFT]" wrote:
> Hello,
> This has been proposed a number of times. It's still under
> discussion. Thanks,
> Darrell Gorter[MSFT]
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights --------------------
> <From: "Wayne Wastier" <(E-Mail Removed)>
> <References: <(E-Mail Removed)>
> <(E-Mail Removed)>
> <uU2gY$(E-Mail Removed)>
> <(E-Mail Removed)>
> <Subject: Re: Windows Server 2003 x86 64-bit NTBackup Failure Issue
> <Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:53:25 -0500
> <Lines: 15
> <X-Priority: 3
> <X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> <X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527
> <X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527
> <X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
> <Message-ID: <(E-Mail Removed)>
> <Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general
> <NNTP-Posting-Host: 66-169-103-95.dhcp.ftwo.tx.charter.com
> 66.169.103.95 <Path:
> TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!tk2msft ngp13.phx.gbl
> <Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
> microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general:8223 <X-Tomcat-NG:
> microsoft.public.windows.64bit.general < <
> <"Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> <news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> <>I have suggested this from a long time ago in CPP group, a question
> like <>this easily gets lost in the Client group.
> <> --
> <> Andre
> <
> <Maybe I need to post this in the tech-beta newsgroup? Will give it a
> shot <and see if it takes.
> <
> <
> <Wayne
> <
> <
> <



 
Reply With Quote
 
Wayne Wastier
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-22-2005

"Charlie Russel - MVP" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Don't hold your breath.
>
> Personally, I think that the need for a 64-bit newsgroup will be
> transient. And it's a lot harder to get rid of a NG than it is to create
> it.
>


Just like they said in the 50's? "Television is a fad, it will pass." LOL


Wayne


 
Reply With Quote
 
Charlie Russel - MVP
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      06-23-2005
No, it's not that 64 bit will pass (at least not for a while), it's that the
problems that make it different will pass, and the problems we see here will
move on to simply be Windows problems, not 64-bit problems.

--
Charlie.
http://www.msmvps.com/xperts64/


Wayne Wastier wrote:
> "Charlie Russel - MVP" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
> message news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Don't hold your breath.
>>
>> Personally, I think that the need for a 64-bit newsgroup will be
>> transient. And it's a lot harder to get rid of a NG than it is to
>> create it.
>>

>
> Just like they said in the 50's? "Television is a fad, it will pass."
> LOL
>
> Wayne



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
x64 vs x86.. surprising results in performance (x86 better)? markm75 Windows 64bit 7 01-09-2008 06:41 PM
NTBACKUP.EXE question on Server 2003 keith chilton MCSA 4 07-11-2007 08:21 PM
Why is there an x86 emu if a processor is x86-64? =?Utf-8?B?RWxsaW90IEh1ZGdpbnM=?= Windows 64bit 4 07-23-2006 11:52 PM
x86 Mac Laptop and x86 iMac now available Daniel NZ Computing 11 01-17-2006 12:11 PM
Ntbackup with VS80 Tape Charlespq@hotmail.com MCSE 3 03-18-2005 07:45 PM



Advertisments