Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computer Certification > MCSE > Installation Confusion

Reply
Thread Tools

Installation Confusion

 
 
Ken Briscoe
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      02-26-2004
> Well, a modem anyway.

Hahahahaha! What's a modem?

--

KB - MCNGP "silent thug" #26

first initial last name AT hotmail DOT com


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
JaR
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      02-26-2004
Ken Briscoe opined, On 2/26/04 10:28 AM:

>>Well, a modem anyway.

>
>
> Hahahahaha! What's a modem?
>



Modem dainbrump is -------------> thattaway
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Paul Lynch
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      02-26-2004
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:57:06 -0000, "Jason Wills"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>if i were to take the official MCSE exam - 70-210, what would be minimum
>installation requirements for Windows 2000 professional? everwhere i look it
>varies from 32MB to 64MB, does anyone know exactly what it should be - i
>dont want to waste a mark on something so small...
>
>Regards
>
>Jason
>


Jason,

Try this :

http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000...qs/default.asp


Regards,

Paul Lynch
MCSE
 
Reply With Quote
 
kpg
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      02-26-2004
Well ya see, that doesn't answer his question. My souce said 32
or 64, yours say 64. Just hope that both 32 and 64 aren't choices
on the test. NIC optional.


 
Reply With Quote
 
Matt
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      02-26-2004
Acutualy, here's the twist:
32 - to install
64 - to run
Thats microsoft for you.

"kpg" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:uakwFzJ$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Well ya see, that doesn't answer his question. My souce said 32
> or 64, yours say 64. Just hope that both 32 and 64 aren't choices
> on the test. NIC optional.
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
kpg
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      02-26-2004
bloody brilliant

"Matt" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:uBX9r6J$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Acutualy, here's the twist:
> 32 - to install
> 64 - to run
> Thats microsoft for you.
>
> "kpg" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:uakwFzJ$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Well ya see, that doesn't answer his question. My souce said 32
> > or 64, yours say 64. Just hope that both 32 and 64 aren't choices
> > on the test. NIC optional.
> >
> >

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Consultant
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      02-26-2004
and 512 to run effectively

"Matt" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:uBX9r6J$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Acutualy, here's the twist:
> 32 - to install
> 64 - to run
> Thats microsoft for you.
>
> "kpg" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:uakwFzJ$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Well ya see, that doesn't answer his question. My souce said 32
> > or 64, yours say 64. Just hope that both 32 and 64 aren't choices
> > on the test. NIC optional.
> >
> >

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Brat
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      02-26-2004
lol just like they say 256 for XP and it runs beautiful with my 192?

--
Sue MCNGP #69

"Consultant" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:u5gl6BK$(E-Mail Removed)...
> and 512 to run effectively
>
> "Matt" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:uBX9r6J$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Acutualy, here's the twist:
> > 32 - to install
> > 64 - to run
> > Thats microsoft for you.
> >
> > "kpg" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news:uakwFzJ$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > Well ya see, that doesn't answer his question. My souce said 32
> > > or 64, yours say 64. Just hope that both 32 and 64 aren't choices
> > > on the test. NIC optional.
> > >
> > >

> >
> >

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Larry Samuels
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      02-27-2004
Hi Sue,

You just think it runs beautifully. <VBEG>
Add ram and watch the performance increase dramatically.
512mb seems to be the sweet spot for workstations, 1gb + for video editing

--
Larry Samuels MS-MVP (Windows-Shell/User)
Associate Expert
Unofficial FAQ for Windows Server 2003 at
http://pelos.us/SERVER.htm
Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone
"Brat" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:%233QRekL$(E-Mail Removed)...
> lol just like they say 256 for XP and it runs beautiful with my 192?
>
> --
> Sue MCNGP #69
>
> "Consultant" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:u5gl6BK$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> and 512 to run effectively
>>
>> "Matt" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:uBX9r6J$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> > Acutualy, here's the twist:
>> > 32 - to install
>> > 64 - to run
>> > Thats microsoft for you.
>> >
>> > "kpg" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> > news:uakwFzJ$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> > > Well ya see, that doesn't answer his question. My souce said 32
>> > > or 64, yours say 64. Just hope that both 32 and 64 aren't choices
>> > > on the test. NIC optional.
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >

>>
>>

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Brat
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      02-27-2004
nah... I'm just gonna get a new system eventually

--
Sue MCNGP #69

"Larry Samuels" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:%23HKc1qS$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi Sue,
>
> You just think it runs beautifully. <VBEG>
> Add ram and watch the performance increase dramatically.
> 512mb seems to be the sweet spot for workstations, 1gb + for video editing
>
> --
> Larry Samuels MS-MVP (Windows-Shell/User)
> Associate Expert
> Unofficial FAQ for Windows Server 2003 at
> http://pelos.us/SERVER.htm
> Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone
> "Brat" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:%233QRekL$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > lol just like they say 256 for XP and it runs beautiful with my 192?
> >
> > --
> > Sue MCNGP #69
> >
> > "Consultant" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news:u5gl6BK$(E-Mail Removed)...
> >> and 512 to run effectively
> >>
> >> "Matt" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> >> news:uBX9r6J$(E-Mail Removed)...
> >> > Acutualy, here's the twist:
> >> > 32 - to install
> >> > 64 - to run
> >> > Thats microsoft for you.
> >> >
> >> > "kpg" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> >> > news:uakwFzJ$(E-Mail Removed)...
> >> > > Well ya see, that doesn't answer his question. My souce said 32
> >> > > or 64, yours say 64. Just hope that both 32 and 64 aren't choices
> >> > > on the test. NIC optional.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>

> >
> >

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mozilla & Firefox Confusion listsubscriber@hotmail.com Firefox 9 01-20-2005 05:09 PM
Confusion about location of Mozilla files (Mandrake Linux 10.0) Hallvard Tangeraas Firefox 0 09-14-2004 09:46 AM
Framework Installation & Deployment Confusion =?Utf-8?B?SW5CaXpfRGV2?= ASP .Net 1 09-13-2004 12:32 PM
confusion when resetting registers martin f. krafft VHDL 2 08-19-2004 06:29 AM



Advertisments