Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Digital Photography > Cut vs crop.

Reply
Thread Tools

Cut vs crop.

 
 
irwell
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-23-2007
Is it better to cut and paste into a new image,
than crop and save to a new image.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Scott W
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-23-2007
On Mar 22, 3:28 pm, irwell <h...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Is it better to cut and paste into a new image,
> than crop and save to a new image.


I don't know what program you are using but in Photoshop Elements it
is much easier to just crop, doing that you can constrain the image
size to say something like 3x2. You can also setup the resolution
when you crop, resizing at the same time you crop. As an example you
can crop and have the resulting image be 4 x 6 inches at 300 ppi,
which can be pretty handy.

Scott

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Bucky
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-23-2007
On Mar 22, 6:28 pm, irwell <h...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Is it better to cut and paste into a new image,
> than crop and save to a new image.


I say stay away from cut and paste. You never know what could happen
to the image during cut and paste (which takes place outside the photo
editing program).

 
Reply With Quote
 
Don Stauffer in Minnesota
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-23-2007
On Mar 23, 2:00 am, "Bucky" <uw_badg...@email.com> wrote:
> On Mar 22, 6:28 pm, irwell <h...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Is it better to cut and paste into a new image,
> > than crop and save to a new image.

>
> I say stay away from cut and paste. You never know what could happen
> to the image during cut and paste (which takes place outside the photo
> editing program).


Depends on the editing program. Both PSP and Photoshop both paste
from within the program. Original is not altered unless you save the
original file with some editing on it.

Still, I also recommend using the crop function if that is all you are
doing. Save cut or copy and paste for more complicated work.

 
Reply With Quote
 
irwell
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-23-2007
On 23 Mar 2007 06:31:04 -0700, "Don Stauffer in Minnesota"
<> wrote:

>On Mar 23, 2:00 am, "Bucky" <uw_badg...@email.com> wrote:
>> On Mar 22, 6:28 pm, irwell <h...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Is it better to cut and paste into a new image,
>> > than crop and save to a new image.

>>
>> I say stay away from cut and paste. You never know what could happen
>> to the image during cut and paste (which takes place outside the photo
>> editing program).

>
>Depends on the editing program. Both PSP and Photoshop both paste
>from within the program. Original is not altered unless you save the
>original file with some editing on it.
>
>Still, I also recommend using the crop function if that is all you are
>doing. Save cut or copy and paste for more complicated work.


On Irfanview there is a function, 'Cut and leave Selection'
this seems pretty handy as the resolution stays the same,
whereas with using Crop, the cropped area pixels seem larger and
blockier.
 
Reply With Quote
 
No 33 Secretary
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-23-2007
irwell <> wrote in
news::

> On 23 Mar 2007 06:31:04 -0700, "Don Stauffer in Minnesota"
> <> wrote:
>
>>On Mar 23, 2:00 am, "Bucky" <uw_badg...@email.com> wrote:
>>> On Mar 22, 6:28 pm, irwell <h...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Is it better to cut and paste into a new image,
>>> > than crop and save to a new image.
>>>
>>> I say stay away from cut and paste. You never know what could
>>> happen to the image during cut and paste (which takes place
>>> outside the photo editing program).

>>
>>Depends on the editing program. Both PSP and Photoshop both
>>paste from within the program. Original is not altered unless
>>you save the original file with some editing on it.
>>
>>Still, I also recommend using the crop function if that is all
>>you are doing. Save cut or copy and paste for more complicated
>>work.

>
> On Irfanview there is a function, 'Cut and leave Selection'


Er, isn't that usually called "Copy"?

--
"What is the first law?"
"To Protect."
"And the second?"
"Ourselves."

Terry Austin
 
Reply With Quote
 
Bucky
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-24-2007
On Mar 23, 8:15 am, irwell <h...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> whereas with using Crop, the cropped area pixels seem larger and
> blockier.


huh? that doesn't sound right. maybe you have "fit to screen", and the
image resolution is smaller than screen resolution, and you don't have
resample mode selected. cropping does not make anything "blockier".
choose the "1:1" view mode.

 
Reply With Quote
 
ASAAR
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-24-2007
On 24 Mar 2007 02:02:06 -0700, Bucky wrote:

>> whereas with using Crop, the cropped area pixels seem larger and
>> blockier.

>
> huh? that doesn't sound right. maybe you have "fit to screen", and the
> image resolution is smaller than screen resolution, and you don't have
> resample mode selected. cropping does not make anything "blockier".
> choose the "1:1" view mode.


Whether either of the "fit to screen" options are enabled or both
are disabled, I've noticed something similar that only happens when
the resampling display option is enabled in Irfanview. If a very
small image is increased or decreased in size using the '+' or '-'
keys (for my current Irfanview configuration), the image's pixels
will be clearly defined. If the 'F' key is pressed to zoom the tiny
image to Full Screen size, the image's pixels are nicely blurred. I
noticed this when looking at very small images of Saturn.
Maximizing the size by typing 'F' produced a clearly defined oval
shape, but following that by slightly reducing the size by typing
'-' once or twice changed the smooth oval into a nearly
unrecognizable object made up of big, square pixels. Typing 'F'
once more produced the smooth, more recognizable object, so typing
'F' triggers resampling, I guess. Another way to 'smooth' the
pixels is to pop up the 'Resize/Resample Image" form, make sure that
"Resample (better quality)" is enabled, and also enable the 'Best
fit to desktop' option. This option doesn't stick, so it has to be
frequently reapplied. But when it is enabled, resampling appears to
also take place even when the '+' and '-' keys are typed.

 
Reply With Quote
 
Don Stauffer in Minnesota
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-24-2007
On Mar 23, 9:15 am, irwell <h...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Irfanview there is a function, 'Cut and leave Selection'
> this seems pretty handy as the resolution stays the same,
> whereas with using Crop, the cropped area pixels seem larger and
> blockier.



With ANY photo editor, cropping always DOES reduce resolution, i.e.,
the number of pixels in the cropped image. It HAS to. Now, you may be
able to upsample to a degree, depending on how good the upsampling
algortithms of the editor are. But there is no way to cut an area
from an image and have the pasted image have the same NATIVE number of
pixels of the original whole image.

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cut/Paste msg in TB 1.0.6 Stubby Firefox 2 01-01-2006 11:47 PM
SLOW BOOT-UP....i cut back on fonts, but now some foxfire text missing reeltyme2002@yahoo.com Firefox 0 06-11-2005 05:01 PM
cut a file to deplace him in an other directory... B.julien Perl 0 04-08-2004 11:10 PM
CUT EXPLORER ON ISDN ROUTER? Antonis Tzitzimpasis Cisco 6 12-03-2003 03:01 PM
removing "favorites" and how to "cut and paste" shirley Microsoft Certification 1 09-26-2003 10:27 PM



Advertisments
 



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57