«

Does anybody know if defining _MT a standard representation for stating
that the compilation is multi-threaded?

Thanks,


Adrian
--
__________________________________________________ ___________________
\/Adrian_Hawryluk BSc. - Specialties: UML, OOPD, Real-Time Systems\/
\ _---_ Q. What are you doing here? _---_ /
\ / | A. Just surf'n the net, teaching and | \ /
\__/___\___ learning, learning and teaching. You?_____/___\__/
\/______[blog:__http://adrians-musings.blogspot.com/]______\/

Adrian Hawryluk wrote:
> Does anybody know if defining _MT a standard representation for
> stating that the compilation is multi-threaded?

It is definitely not. There is no "multi-threaded" concept that
C++ knows about.

V
--
Please remove capital 'A's when replying by e-mail
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask

Victor Bazarov wrote:
> Adrian Hawryluk wrote:
>> Does anybody know if defining _MT a standard representation for
>> stating that the compilation is multi-threaded?
>
> It is definitely not. There is no "multi-threaded" concept that
> C++ knows about.

Sorry wrong newsgroup. Meant to post to comp.programming.threads.

Thanks,


Adrian
--
__________________________________________________ ___________________
\/Adrian_Hawryluk BSc. - Specialties: UML, OOPD, Real-Time Systems\/
\ _---_ Q. What are you doing here? _---_ /
\ / | A. Just surf'n the net, teaching and | \ /
\__/___\___ learning, learning and teaching. You?_____/___\__/
\/______[blog:__http://adrians-musings.blogspot.com/]______\/