MCSE - OT: Routing

01-20-2004, 03:53 PM

I have a Cisco 3640 with 2 Ethernet interfaces.

--- 192.168.1.X
--- 192.168.2.X

My home cable network is on the 192.168.1.x network. I
have a seperate network (192.168.2.X) on the other.

I have static routes set up for the secondary network to
reach the DG 192.168.1.1 and they reach the Internet fine.
BUT, they cannot communicate via NETBios and RPC etc.
between eachother. I tried setting a IP-HELPER address on
each interface to hosts on each subnet but no luck. Should
I do a Protocol-Helper too for 138, 137?

What am I missing here?

Am I a stoopit kook that doesn't deserve to route NETBT
between 2 subnets? Do I need a host file? WINS?

Thanks,
Martha's Son

Poopie Shooter

01-20-2004, 04:23 PM

Instead of using broadcasts to resolve NETBios names on a subnetted network,
either use a DNS server, a WINS server, or local HOSTS and/or LMHOSTS files
to resolve NETBios names into IP addresses.

--
Politician Spock
Thug #24601

"Poopie Shooter" <> wrote in message
news:0a8a01c3df6d$8fd8df50$...
> I have a Cisco 3640 with 2 Ethernet interfaces.
>
> --- 192.168.1.X
> --- 192.168.2.X
>
> My home cable network is on the 192.168.1.x network. I
> have a seperate network (192.168.2.X) on the other.
>
> I have static routes set up for the secondary network to
> reach the DG 192.168.1.1 and they reach the Internet fine.
> BUT, they cannot communicate via NETBios and RPC etc.
> between eachother. I tried setting a IP-HELPER address on
> each interface to hosts on each subnet but no luck. Should
> I do a Protocol-Helper too for 138, 137?
>
> What am I missing here?
>
> Am I a stoopit kook that doesn't deserve to route NETBT
> between 2 subnets? Do I need a host file? WINS?
>
> Thanks,
> Martha's Son

Politician Spock

01-20-2004, 04:41 PM

I can't even ping hosts between the subnets though ... but
they reach the Internet fine on net #2 ...

>-----Original Message-----
>Instead of using broadcasts to resolve NETBios names on a
subnetted network,
>either use a DNS server, a WINS server, or local HOSTS
and/or LMHOSTS files
>to resolve NETBios names into IP addresses.
>
>--
>Politician Spock
>Thug #24601
>
>
>"Poopie Shooter" <>
wrote in message
>news:0a8a01c3df6d$8fd8df50$...
>> I have a Cisco 3640 with 2 Ethernet interfaces.
>>
>> --- 192.168.1.X
>> --- 192.168.2.X
>>
>> My home cable network is on the 192.168.1.x network. I
>> have a seperate network (192.168.2.X) on the other.
>>
>> I have static routes set up for the secondary network to
>> reach the DG 192.168.1.1 and they reach the Internet
fine.
>> BUT, they cannot communicate via NETBios and RPC etc.
>> between eachother. I tried setting a IP-HELPER address
on
>> each interface to hosts on each subnet but no luck.
Should
>> I do a Protocol-Helper too for 138, 137?
>>
>> What am I missing here?
>>
>> Am I a stoopit kook that doesn't deserve to route NETBT
>> between 2 subnets? Do I need a host file? WINS?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Martha's Son
>
>
>.
>

But

01-20-2004, 04:56 PM

Is the static route you set up to reach IP address 192.168.1.1 or to reach
the subnet 192.168.1.X?

--
Politician Spock
Thug #24601

"But" <> wrote in message
news:12c001c3df74$47965220$...
>
> I can't even ping hosts between the subnets though ... but
> they reach the Internet fine on net #2 ...
>
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >Instead of using broadcasts to resolve NETBios names on a
> subnetted network,
> >either use a DNS server, a WINS server, or local HOSTS
> and/or LMHOSTS files
> >to resolve NETBios names into IP addresses.
> >
> >--
> >Politician Spock
> >Thug #24601
> >
> >
> >"Poopie Shooter" <>
> wrote in message
> >news:0a8a01c3df6d$8fd8df50$...
> >> I have a Cisco 3640 with 2 Ethernet interfaces.
> >>
> >> --- 192.168.1.X
> >> --- 192.168.2.X
> >>
> >> My home cable network is on the 192.168.1.x network. I
> >> have a seperate network (192.168.2.X) on the other.
> >>
> >> I have static routes set up for the secondary network to
> >> reach the DG 192.168.1.1 and they reach the Internet
> fine.
> >> BUT, they cannot communicate via NETBios and RPC etc.
> >> between eachother. I tried setting a IP-HELPER address
> on
> >> each interface to hosts on each subnet but no luck.
> Should
> >> I do a Protocol-Helper too for 138, 137?
> >>
> >> What am I missing here?
> >>
> >> Am I a stoopit kook that doesn't deserve to route NETBT
> >> between 2 subnets? Do I need a host file? WINS?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Martha's Son
> >
> >
> >.
> >

Politician Spock

01-20-2004, 05:23 PM

Yes indeed the static route is for the DG 192.168.1.1.

Should I make a static route for the E0/1 which is
192.168.2.1?

Thanx for your help man.

This is really basic stuff, but I've actually never set up
routing Windows between 2 subnets on one router with 2 E
ints.

>-----Original Message-----
>Is the static route you set up to reach IP address
192.168.1.1 or to reach
>the subnet 192.168.1.X?
>
>--
>Politician Spock
>Thug #24601
>
>
>"But" <> wrote in
message
>news:12c001c3df74$47965220$...
>>
>> I can't even ping hosts between the subnets though ...
but
>> they reach the Internet fine on net #2 ...
>>
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >Instead of using broadcasts to resolve NETBios names
on a
>> subnetted network,
>> >either use a DNS server, a WINS server, or local HOSTS
>> and/or LMHOSTS files
>> >to resolve NETBios names into IP addresses.
>> >
>> >--
>> >Politician Spock
>> >Thug #24601
>> >
>> >
>> >"Poopie Shooter" <>
>> wrote in message
>> >news:0a8a01c3df6d$8fd8df50$...
>> >> I have a Cisco 3640 with 2 Ethernet interfaces.
>> >>
>> >> --- 192.168.1.X
>> >> --- 192.168.2.X
>> >>
>> >> My home cable network is on the 192.168.1.x network.
I
>> >> have a seperate network (192.168.2.X) on the other.
>> >>
>> >> I have static routes set up for the secondary
network to
>> >> reach the DG 192.168.1.1 and they reach the Internet
>> fine.
>> >> BUT, they cannot communicate via NETBios and RPC etc.
>> >> between eachother. I tried setting a IP-HELPER
address
>> on
>> >> each interface to hosts on each subnet but no luck.
>> Should
>> >> I do a Protocol-Helper too for 138, 137?
>> >>
>> >> What am I missing here?
>> >>
>> >> Am I a stoopit kook that doesn't deserve to route
NETBT
>> >> between 2 subnets? Do I need a host file? WINS?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Martha's Son
>> >
>> >
>> >.
>> >
>
>
>.
>

Thx

01-20-2004, 05:33 PM

Instead of making that route specific to the IP addess 192.168.1.1, make it
for the subnet 192.168.1.X, that way any request destined for that subnet
will be routed, not just ones destined for the 192.168.1.1 host.

--
Politician Spock
Thug #24601

"Thx" <> wrote in message
news:110401c3df7a$28c2b900$...
> Yes indeed the static route is for the DG 192.168.1.1.
>
> Should I make a static route for the E0/1 which is
> 192.168.2.1?
>
> Thanx for your help man.
>
> This is really basic stuff, but I've actually never set up
> routing Windows between 2 subnets on one router with 2 E
> ints.
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >Is the static route you set up to reach IP address
> 192.168.1.1 or to reach
> >the subnet 192.168.1.X?
> >
> >--
> >Politician Spock
> >Thug #24601
> >
> >
> >"But" <> wrote in
> message
> >news:12c001c3df74$47965220$...
> >>
> >> I can't even ping hosts between the subnets though ...
> but
> >> they reach the Internet fine on net #2 ...
> >>
> >>
> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >Instead of using broadcasts to resolve NETBios names
> on a
> >> subnetted network,
> >> >either use a DNS server, a WINS server, or local HOSTS
> >> and/or LMHOSTS files
> >> >to resolve NETBios names into IP addresses.
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >Politician Spock
> >> >Thug #24601
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >"Poopie Shooter" <>
> >> wrote in message
> >> >news:0a8a01c3df6d$8fd8df50$...
> >> >> I have a Cisco 3640 with 2 Ethernet interfaces.
> >> >>
> >> >> --- 192.168.1.X
> >> >> --- 192.168.2.X
> >> >>
> >> >> My home cable network is on the 192.168.1.x network.
> I
> >> >> have a seperate network (192.168.2.X) on the other.
> >> >>
> >> >> I have static routes set up for the secondary
> network to
> >> >> reach the DG 192.168.1.1 and they reach the Internet
> >> fine.
> >> >> BUT, they cannot communicate via NETBios and RPC etc.
> >> >> between eachother. I tried setting a IP-HELPER
> address
> >> on
> >> >> each interface to hosts on each subnet but no luck.
> >> Should
> >> >> I do a Protocol-Helper too for 138, 137?
> >> >>
> >> >> What am I missing here?
> >> >>
> >> >> Am I a stoopit kook that doesn't deserve to route
> NETBT
> >> >> between 2 subnets? Do I need a host file? WINS?
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> Martha's Son
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >.
> >> >
> >
> >
> >.
> >

Politician Spock

01-20-2004, 04:41 PM	#3
But Posts: n/a	Re: Routing I can't even ping hosts between the subnets though ... but they reach the Internet fine on net #2 ... >-----Original Message----- >Instead of using broadcasts to resolve NETBios names on a subnetted network, >either use a DNS server, a WINS server, or local HOSTS and/or LMHOSTS files >to resolve NETBios names into IP addresses. > >-- >Politician Spock >Thug #24601 > > >"Poopie Shooter" <> wrote in message >news:0a8a01c3df6d$8fd8df50$... >> I have a Cisco 3640 with 2 Ethernet interfaces. >> >> --- 192.168.1.X >> --- 192.168.2.X >> >> My home cable network is on the 192.168.1.x network. I >> have a seperate network (192.168.2.X) on the other. >> >> I have static routes set up for the secondary network to >> reach the DG 192.168.1.1 and they reach the Internet fine. >> BUT, they cannot communicate via NETBios and RPC etc. >> between eachother. I tried setting a IP-HELPER address on >> each interface to hosts on each subnet but no luck. Should >> I do a Protocol-Helper too for 138, 137? >> >> What am I missing here? >> >> Am I a stoopit kook that doesn't deserve to route NETBT >> between 2 subnets? Do I need a host file? WINS? >> >> Thanks, >> Martha's Son > > >. > But

01-20-2004, 04:56 PM	#4
Politician Spock Posts: n/a	Re: Routing Is the static route you set up to reach IP address 192.168.1.1 or to reach the subnet 192.168.1.X? -- Politician Spock Thug #24601 "But" <> wrote in message news:12c001c3df74$47965220$... > > I can't even ping hosts between the subnets though ... but > they reach the Internet fine on net #2 ... > > > >-----Original Message----- > >Instead of using broadcasts to resolve NETBios names on a > subnetted network, > >either use a DNS server, a WINS server, or local HOSTS > and/or LMHOSTS files > >to resolve NETBios names into IP addresses. > > > >-- > >Politician Spock > >Thug #24601 > > > > > >"Poopie Shooter" <> > wrote in message > >news:0a8a01c3df6d$8fd8df50$... > >> I have a Cisco 3640 with 2 Ethernet interfaces. > >> > >> --- 192.168.1.X > >> --- 192.168.2.X > >> > >> My home cable network is on the 192.168.1.x network. I > >> have a seperate network (192.168.2.X) on the other. > >> > >> I have static routes set up for the secondary network to > >> reach the DG 192.168.1.1 and they reach the Internet > fine. > >> BUT, they cannot communicate via NETBios and RPC etc. > >> between eachother. I tried setting a IP-HELPER address > on > >> each interface to hosts on each subnet but no luck. > Should > >> I do a Protocol-Helper too for 138, 137? > >> > >> What am I missing here? > >> > >> Am I a stoopit kook that doesn't deserve to route NETBT > >> between 2 subnets? Do I need a host file? WINS? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Martha's Son > > > > > >. > > Politician Spock

01-20-2004, 05:23 PM	#5
Thx Posts: n/a	Re: Routing Yes indeed the static route is for the DG 192.168.1.1. Should I make a static route for the E0/1 which is 192.168.2.1? Thanx for your help man. This is really basic stuff, but I've actually never set up routing Windows between 2 subnets on one router with 2 E ints. >-----Original Message----- >Is the static route you set up to reach IP address 192.168.1.1 or to reach >the subnet 192.168.1.X? > >-- >Politician Spock >Thug #24601 > > >"But" <> wrote in message >news:12c001c3df74$47965220$... >> >> I can't even ping hosts between the subnets though ... but >> they reach the Internet fine on net #2 ... >> >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >Instead of using broadcasts to resolve NETBios names on a >> subnetted network, >> >either use a DNS server, a WINS server, or local HOSTS >> and/or LMHOSTS files >> >to resolve NETBios names into IP addresses. >> > >> >-- >> >Politician Spock >> >Thug #24601 >> > >> > >> >"Poopie Shooter" <> >> wrote in message >> >news:0a8a01c3df6d$8fd8df50$... >> >> I have a Cisco 3640 with 2 Ethernet interfaces. >> >> >> >> --- 192.168.1.X >> >> --- 192.168.2.X >> >> >> >> My home cable network is on the 192.168.1.x network. I >> >> have a seperate network (192.168.2.X) on the other. >> >> >> >> I have static routes set up for the secondary network to >> >> reach the DG 192.168.1.1 and they reach the Internet >> fine. >> >> BUT, they cannot communicate via NETBios and RPC etc. >> >> between eachother. I tried setting a IP-HELPER address >> on >> >> each interface to hosts on each subnet but no luck. >> Should >> >> I do a Protocol-Helper too for 138, 137? >> >> >> >> What am I missing here? >> >> >> >> Am I a stoopit kook that doesn't deserve to route NETBT >> >> between 2 subnets? Do I need a host file? WINS? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Martha's Son >> > >> > >> >. >> > > > >. > Thx

01-20-2004, 05:33 PM	#6
Politician Spock Posts: n/a	Re: Routing Instead of making that route specific to the IP addess 192.168.1.1, make it for the subnet 192.168.1.X, that way any request destined for that subnet will be routed, not just ones destined for the 192.168.1.1 host. -- Politician Spock Thug #24601 "Thx" <> wrote in message news:110401c3df7a$28c2b900$... > Yes indeed the static route is for the DG 192.168.1.1. > > Should I make a static route for the E0/1 which is > 192.168.2.1? > > Thanx for your help man. > > This is really basic stuff, but I've actually never set up > routing Windows between 2 subnets on one router with 2 E > ints. > > >-----Original Message----- > >Is the static route you set up to reach IP address > 192.168.1.1 or to reach > >the subnet 192.168.1.X? > > > >-- > >Politician Spock > >Thug #24601 > > > > > >"But" <> wrote in > message > >news:12c001c3df74$47965220$... > >> > >> I can't even ping hosts between the subnets though ... > but > >> they reach the Internet fine on net #2 ... > >> > >> > >> >-----Original Message----- > >> >Instead of using broadcasts to resolve NETBios names > on a > >> subnetted network, > >> >either use a DNS server, a WINS server, or local HOSTS > >> and/or LMHOSTS files > >> >to resolve NETBios names into IP addresses. > >> > > >> >-- > >> >Politician Spock > >> >Thug #24601 > >> > > >> > > >> >"Poopie Shooter" <> > >> wrote in message > >> >news:0a8a01c3df6d$8fd8df50$... > >> >> I have a Cisco 3640 with 2 Ethernet interfaces. > >> >> > >> >> --- 192.168.1.X > >> >> --- 192.168.2.X > >> >> > >> >> My home cable network is on the 192.168.1.x network. > I > >> >> have a seperate network (192.168.2.X) on the other. > >> >> > >> >> I have static routes set up for the secondary > network to > >> >> reach the DG 192.168.1.1 and they reach the Internet > >> fine. > >> >> BUT, they cannot communicate via NETBios and RPC etc. > >> >> between eachother. I tried setting a IP-HELPER > address > >> on > >> >> each interface to hosts on each subnet but no luck. > >> Should > >> >> I do a Protocol-Helper too for 138, 137? > >> >> > >> >> What am I missing here? > >> >> > >> >> Am I a stoopit kook that doesn't deserve to route > NETBT > >> >> between 2 subnets? Do I need a host file? WINS? > >> >> > >> >> Thanks, > >> >> Martha's Son > >> > > >> > > >> >. > >> > > > > > > >. > > Politician Spock

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

01-20-2004, 03:53 PM	#1
	OT: Routing I have a Cisco 3640 with 2 Ethernet interfaces. --- 192.168.1.X --- 192.168.2.X My home cable network is on the 192.168.1.x network. I have a seperate network (192.168.2.X) on the other. I have static routes set up for the secondary network to reach the DG 192.168.1.1 and they reach the Internet fine. BUT, they cannot communicate via NETBios and RPC etc. between eachother. I tried setting a IP-HELPER address on each interface to hosts on each subnet but no luck. Should I do a Protocol-Helper too for 138, 137? What am I missing here? Am I a stoopit kook that doesn't deserve to route NETBT between 2 subnets? Do I need a host file? WINS? Thanks, Martha's Son Poopie Shooter

01-20-2004, 04:23 PM	#2
Politician Spock Posts: n/a	Re: Routing Instead of using broadcasts to resolve NETBios names on a subnetted network, either use a DNS server, a WINS server, or local HOSTS and/or LMHOSTS files to resolve NETBios names into IP addresses. -- Politician Spock Thug #24601 "Poopie Shooter" <> wrote in message news:0a8a01c3df6d$8fd8df50$... > I have a Cisco 3640 with 2 Ethernet interfaces. > > --- 192.168.1.X > --- 192.168.2.X > > My home cable network is on the 192.168.1.x network. I > have a seperate network (192.168.2.X) on the other. > > I have static routes set up for the secondary network to > reach the DG 192.168.1.1 and they reach the Internet fine. > BUT, they cannot communicate via NETBios and RPC etc. > between eachother. I tried setting a IP-HELPER address on > each interface to hosts on each subnet but no luck. Should > I do a Protocol-Helper too for 138, 137? > > What am I missing here? > > Am I a stoopit kook that doesn't deserve to route NETBT > between 2 subnets? Do I need a host file? WINS? > > Thanks, > Martha's Son Politician Spock

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Cisco PIX 506e Firewall - Routing	jnk	General Help Related Topics	1	05-29-2009 06:04 PM
Cisco 4506 Policy Based Routing command missing	theizer1	Hardware	0	11-14-2008 07:53 PM
InterVlan routing using Cisco 877	sunoj81	General Help Related Topics	1	09-25-2007 08:26 PM
PIX 515 Firewall Policy based Routing?	myselfimran	Hardware	0	07-03-2007 11:17 AM
switches that won't stop routing	kienast	Hardware	0	06-25-2007 04:38 PM