"Mark Scott" <mark-> wrote in
news:ZEiKb.21$:
> Can someone explain this confusion for me? I created a global
> group today to assign permissions to a resource in a different
> domain but it wouldn;t work, I had to use a Domain Local group for
> that.
>
> Global to me means a far reaching group with more "coverage" than
> a Domain Local (local to the domain) so I assumed that to
> permission objects outside a domain to use Globals.
>
> Any ideas why the naming sounds arse about face?
Global Groups have global scope within a domain boundary and only
within a domain boundary.
Universal Groups extend past domain boundaries and can be used inside
(and out of) domains. This requires resources by a GC and therefore
using Universal Groups should be used sparingly according to Microsoft.
Domain Local Groups are usually used to assign permissions to groups
and or users to use a specific resource such as a printer or share.
They have scope only within that domain.
HTH,
Adam
|