«

Hey...passed the 296, have to re-take the 292, though. Just wondering for
those who are getting the 2003 upgrade, if they thought that 70-292 was very
very hard?? The choices for answers seemed to have such minute differences.

Disclaimer: In case I gave to much information about the test, I take it
back. Otherwise, what do y'all think?

I did 292 and 296 beginning of December (292 on 4th, 296 on 5th). I also thought that 292 was harder than 296 (only slightly though). Maybe it was the large number of DNS questions at the start of the exam

Richar
MCDBA in SQL Server 200
MCSE in Windows Server 2003 (early achiever
MCSA in Windows Server 2003 (early achiever
MCSE in Windows 2000 (early achiever
MCSA in Windows 2000 (charter member
MCSE in Windows NT

*** And now for a long rest ***

Richard wrote:
> I did 292 and 296 beginning of December (292 on 4th, 296 on 5th). I also
thought that 292 was harder than 296 (only slightly
> though). Maybe it was the large number of DNS questions at the start of
the exam.
>
> Richard
> MCDBA in SQL Server 2000
> MCSE in Windows Server 2003 (early achiever)
> MCSA in Windows Server 2003 (early achiever)
> MCSE in Windows 2000 (early achiever)
> MCSA in Windows 2000 (charter member)
> MCSE in Windows NT4
>
> *** And now for a long rest ***

Hello Richard,

I took and passed easily the 292 test becoming MCSA 2003 "early achiever"!

You really think that 296 is easier as 292 ?

For information, I already passed the beta test of 294 (AD).

Another way could be to take the 293(Network), is it a good idea?

I'm not sure of that!

Bye.

MCSE+M/MCSA+M
MCSE in Windows 2000 (early achiever)
MCSA in Windows 2000
MCSE+I
MCSE in Windows NT4
MCSE in Windows NT3.51
MCDBA 7 and 2000

--
Meilleurs voeux pour cette année 2004!

Thierry DEMAN-BARCELÒ
[MCSE option Messaging, MCSA 2003].
Site personnel: http://webfamilial.dyndns.org/thierr...principale.htm
http://tdeman.free.fr/thierry/pageprincipale.htm