|
|
|
|
12-04-2003, 10:10 PM
|
#1 |
70-210 vs 70-270
Do anyone know how 70-210 W2K Professional is compared to 70-270 Windows XP
exams? I signed up for 70-270 when I was told the 70-290 is not available pt. Have taken the 70-210 some time ago. .... as someone said in an earlier posting, why am I doing this ...? Jan.F Jafurulu |
|
|
|
12-05-2003, 01:29 AM
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Re: 70-210 vs 70-270
They are, effectively, the same test but on different products. They are
interchangable, meaning that you can take credit for only one of them towards your MCSE or MCSA requirement. If you've passed 70-210 already, you're probably wasting your money on taking 70-270 unless you've got a distinct (READ: paying) reason to take it. Best, Will www.mcseworld.com "Jafurulu" <> wrote in message news:... > Do anyone know how 70-210 W2K Professional is compared to 70-270 Windows XP > exams? I signed up for 70-270 when I was told the 70-290 is not available > pt. Have taken the 70-210 some time ago. > > ... as someone said in an earlier posting, why am I doing this ...? > > Jan.F > > MCSE World |
|
|
|
12-05-2003, 07:19 PM
|
#3 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Re: 70-210 vs 70-270
MCSE World wrote:
>They are, effectively, the same test but on different products. Yes, the questions is much the same, but there is more questions where you need to know the syntax of command line programs. (e.g. convert, sfc, sigverif, secedit, some disk admin tools and even the start command and it's parameters and some programs I don't remember I have ever heard about) > If you've passed 70-210 already, you're probably wasting your money on taking 70-270 unless > you've got a distinct (READ: paying) reason to take it. Well, yes, I just wanted to know. And One Day in the future the Windows 2000 Professional will be retired and out-dated, and the XP test will still be valid a year or two... (BTW, I passed with score 725, it was the command line programs that nearly kicked me down...) Jan.F Jafurulu |
|
|
