«

What is the latest version of FA ? I have 1.93.Is this it ?
Thanks

On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:46:24 -0500, Jay Lombardi <>
wrote:

>What is the latest version of FA ? I have 1.93.Is this it ?

I don't know. What happens when you go to http://www.forteinc.com ?

On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:46:24 -0500, Jay Lombardi <>
wrote:

>What is the latest version of FA ? I have 1.93.Is this it ?
>Thanks

I'm using version 4.0/32.1071

That's the latest release version.

--
Steve Wolstenholme Neural Planner Software

EasyNN-plus. The easy way to build neural networks.
http://www.easynn.com

Jay Lombardi wrote:

> What is the latest version of FA ? I have 1.93.Is this it ?

If you have 1.93, you're not using it. Your header indicates:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846

--
-bts
-Motorcycles defy gravity; cars just suck.

I know I'm not using it.I have 1.93 and was trying to find out if it
is thel latest version before installing.

On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:06:06 GMT, "Beauregard T. Shagnasty"
<> wrote:

>Jay Lombardi wrote:
>
>> What is the latest version of FA ? I have 1.93.Is this it ?
>
>If you have 1.93, you're not using it. Your header indicates:
>X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846

Jay Lombardi wrote:

> I know I'm not using it.I have 1.93 and was trying to find out if it
> is thel latest version before installing.

Most programs use numbers to indicate releases. The higher the number the
newer the release.
Most people put their reply UNDER (relevant) quoted text.

Jay Lombardi wrote:

> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:06:06 GMT, "Beauregard T. Shagnasty"
> <> wrote:
>
>>Jay Lombardi wrote:
>>
>>> What is the latest version of FA ? I have 1.93.Is this it ?
>>
>>If you have 1.93, you're not using it. Your header indicates:
>>X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
>
> I know I'm not using it.I have 1.93 and was trying to find out if it
> is thel latest version before installing.

Then I'm not sure I understand. You are already posting with 3.3/32.846,
which is considerably newer than 1.93. So why would you ask "I have
1.93.Is this it [the latest]?"

--
-bts
-Motorcycles defy gravity; cars just suck.

On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:36:44 GMT, "Beauregard T. Shagnasty"
<> wrote:

>Then I'm not sure I understand. You are already posting with 3.3/32.846,
>which is considerably newer than 1.93. So why would you ask "I have
>1.93.Is this it [the latest]?"

In some countries, 3 comes before 1.

Hiya Jay Lombardi.

In <news: > you wrote:

>>> What is the latest version of FA ? I have 1.93.Is this it ?
>>If you have 1.93, you're not using it. Your header indicates:
>>X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
> I know I'm not using it.I have 1.93 and was trying to find out if it
> is thel latest version before installing.

So you're using v3.3, and have v1.93 and wonder if that's the latest?
You're either trolling or totally stupid. For one I don't think you're
*totally* stupid, though top posting is pushing the envelope a bit

--
PGP key ID - DSS:0x2661A952
Ponder - Homepage: http://www.colinjones.co.uk ICQ# 1707811
Skittles Team: http://www.ddskittles.co.uk

"sittingduck" <you.love.sitting-> wrote in message
news:Xns98449DEE4A19Dduckrulestheuniverse@quakefou r.net...
> Jay Lombardi wrote:
>
>> I know I'm not using it.I have 1.93 and was trying to find out if it
>> is thel latest version before installing.
>
> Most programs use numbers to indicate releases. The higher the number the
> newer the release.
> Most people put their reply UNDER (relevant) quoted text.
You better contact Microsoft then as Outlook/express defaults to reply on
top of a message. I would rather have it that way and it saves reading all
the way through again and again as each person posts. It also saves
scrolling down on each message. Why would you need to read the whole
message again and again on each reply before reading the reply if you read
the original? Do you not follow what is posted too well?