![]() |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Greetings
Please advise which MCSE 2003 exam would be better to start with. I just received my Server Core requirements Kits and am wondering what would be the best for me to start with. Thanks a lot for your advice. Smain SM |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
If you don't have XP do that -- if you have XP start with Server 70-290
but make a plan to do ALL of them quickly -- study for them together rather than trying to just pass "one test." -- Herb Martin "SM" <smain@uk> wrote in message news:uWydwT$... > Greetings > > Please advise which MCSE 2003 exam would be better to start with. I just > received my Server Core requirements Kits and am wondering what would be the > best for me to start with. > > Thanks a lot for your advice. > > Smain > > Herb Martin |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
You should start with 70-290.
>-----Original Message----- >Greetings > >Please advise which MCSE 2003 exam would be better to start with. I just >received my Server Core requirements Kits and am wondering what would be the >best for me to start with. ascll |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Hi ,
Would like to know why you advise to plan to do ALL of them quickly, instead of just focusing one by one? 'cos I'm also preparing for MCSE 2003 and would like to know dos and don'ts. Thanks Pine Herb Martin wrote: > If you don't have XP do that -- if you have XP start with Server 70-290 > but make a plan to do ALL of them quickly -- study for them together > rather than trying to just pass "one test." > > -- > Herb Martin > "SM" <smain@uk> wrote in message > news:uWydwT$... > > Greetings > > > > Please advise which MCSE 2003 exam would be better to start with. I just > > received my Server Core requirements Kits and am wondering what would be > the > > best for me to start with. > > > > Thanks a lot for your advice. > > > > Smain > > > > Pine |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
I agree, (maybe not on the quickly) because the courses are (and
always were under 2000) very inter linked. I am seeing this on my 2k3 studies just like I did on 2000. 270 requires some working knowledge of AD and group policy which you get from 294/297 study material and 291 draws on 290 / 270. Plan to study the whole core then home in on each exam in turn before taking them. On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 15:46:18 +0800, Pine <> wrote: >Hi , > > Would like to know why you advise to plan to do ALL of them quickly, instead >of just focusing one by one? 'cos I'm also preparing for MCSE 2003 and would >like to know dos and don'ts. > >Thanks > >Pine > >Herb Martin wrote: > >> If you don't have XP do that -- if you have XP start with Server 70-290 >> but make a plan to do ALL of them quickly -- study for them together >> rather than trying to just pass "one test." >> >> -- >> Herb Martin >> "SM" <smain@uk> wrote in message >> news:uWydwT$... >> > Greetings >> > >> > Please advise which MCSE 2003 exam would be better to start with. I just >> > received my Server Core requirements Kits and am wondering what would be >> the >> > best for me to start with. >> > >> > Thanks a lot for your advice. >> > >> > Smain >> > >> > Marlin Munrow |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
> Would like to know why you advise to plan to do ALL of them quickly,
instead > of just focusing one by one? 'cos I'm also preparing for MCSE 2003 and would > like to know dos and don'ts. Because it works and you learn more -- not only faster but better. Then you have the "basic exam knowledge" sooner to build your experience upon if you are new or to broaden your experience if you have lots of skill already. I have never taken more than 4 days preparing for an exam (even on an entirely new subject) -- this is NOT bragging on me but rather a METHOD that works for everyone. Maximum time should be about 2 weeks per exam IF YOU ARE studying and not just "thinking about it." Studying for the exams together is time efficient (and partically avoids the "just the test questions" pitfall) and taking the next exam REINFORCES what you learned while it is still fresh in your memory. Once you reinforce new learning a few times you will remember it forever, but if you let new learning lie fallow until you forget, then typically you will need to start over on the "next subject". Those who plan a year seldom finish. Plan no more than 6 montsh (3 is better) for an ENTIRE MCSE. If you go over the 3 months a bit, then no harm no foul but if you plan a year there is little chance you will actually DO IT and finish. Also consider what having that knowledge (and the certification) would do for your learning from experience during that year versus not having that base knowledge. -- Herb Martin Herb Martin |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| MCSE 2003 tp MCITP : Enterprise Administrator | Brijesh | MCITP | 1 | 07-06-2009 12:57 PM |
| MCSE 2003 w/Exchange or MCITP 2008 w/Exchange | Juan | MCITP | 3 | 06-19-2009 08:29 PM |
| RE: MCSE 2003 to MCITP : Enterprise Administrator | duduball | MCITP | 0 | 05-25-2009 03:04 PM |
| Upgrading from MCSE server 2003 to Server 2008 certification | jpcvnp | MCITP | 3 | 07-07-2008 06:00 PM |
| A-1 Cheap Dvds | CHEAPDVDS | DVD Video | 0 | 06-19-2005 03:30 AM |