![]() |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
I just wanted to provide a little feedback on the 70-215 exam I passed
this morning, since a lot of people see different types of exams. I took the exam at a Prometric center in Columbus, OH. My exam was 60 questions, they gave me about 2 1/2 hours to finish. I took a little over an hour, and they do let you go back and review all questions, even those you didn't mark during the first run-through. They did NOT provide an actual score, it simply says PASS. Which is fine and good since I passed, but if I had failed, I really would have wanted to know how close I was. The first 8 of 10 questions were very difficult. Most were exhibits, they dealt with SNMP, subnetting, etc. After that, it was mostly okay. There were 5-6 questions on GPO, 12-15 exhibits total, 5-6 on hard drive management. They can definately get tricky with the wording, it's so important to take your time and read everything closely. I used the MSPress book along with as many practice/demo exams I could find, just to get me back into test mode. I acquired my MCSE + Internet in NT 4.0 back in July 1999, so it's been a long while since I've done this. Now I'm going to hit the SQL exams and take 70-216 as my last elective, which I've heard is a bear. Hope this helps! -Barr26 Rick Barr |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
"Rick" <> wrote in message news:<>...
> Barr > 70-216 is not that bad. I have knocked out 70-270, 70-215, 70-218, 70-216 > and 70-217 since the end of July. I think what makes the difference is how > much experience and aptitude you have. Since I am a one man IT department > for a 400 employee business I get experience with every aspect of the IT > operation (this is not always a positive). I have a network with 4 sites > connected by Cisco routers, DNS, DHCP, WINS, RRAS, and Netscreen firewalls. > I considered 70-216 a bear becuase although none of the information in the > topics cover by the test were difficult to understand it had a massive > amount of information to study. > > Rick I have thought that maybe it would be better to jump into 70-216 while I have all this Win2K admin stuff fresh in my head. I'm more anxious to get to the SQL part, but I am going to check out my 70-216 book first and see if maybe I can get it done in 2-3 weeks. Unfortunately, while I have a lot of years of technical experience, not much of it is in actual network administration. I've actually done more Novell Netware administration than Windows. But I do have 3 PCs at home with a router that I can experiment with. As for the amount of info to study, at first glance it would seem there is less to study, compared to the 70-215 book. A difference of several hundred pages. But I'm sure it's quite a bit more intricate. I'll probably make a decision after this weekend, which I am using for some well-deserved rest. Thanks, -Barr26 Rick Barr |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
I'm sure being in the position that you are helps immensely. Right
now, I'm stuck in helpdesk-type roles simply because the market is so terrible, so it's really up to me to be self-motivated and get this done myself. "Simon Chang" <> wrote in message news:<eaca01c382c6$d25cd2e0$>... > Hey folks, > > Just finished MCSE Win2K myself recently. '216 wasn't > bad, compared to 220. A lot of the networking basics like > routing is covered, but if you have anywhere near decent > amount of know-how about that (for example, I finished my > CCNP prior to upgrading my MCSE, so I was fairly familiar > with OSPF to begin with) you should be OK. (That, plus > the ability to think logically. And a large can of > addiction-forming drink.) > > Like Rick, I am one of only two IT guys in an organization > that has multiple sites and servers to boot. My manager > and I also support a couple of developers, one of whom is > incidentally the department chief who (looking over my > shoulders as I type this) is not an IT guy. We are > rolling out Win2003 infrastructure from NT 4.0 in the next > six months - "soup-to-nut" style. From the NOS, to re- > organizing our subnets, to doing VLANs, to AD, to > supporting applications (going from Office 97 to Office > System ain't easy...) we do it all. > > Good luck, > > Simon Chang, MCSE, CCNP > > Rick Barr |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| MCDBA to MCPD and MCITP | MCDBA to MCPD and MCITP | MCTS | 1 | 07-12-2008 12:40 PM |
| Passed OS Exam. I am now A+ Certified :>) | Viken Karaguesian | A+ Certification | 4 | 05-04-2006 12:34 AM |
| passed the op exam!! | graham | A+ Certification | 0 | 07-26-2004 10:07 PM |
| Re: Passed 220-301 HW - My experience | Fred Mathering | A+ Certification | 1 | 07-12-2004 07:36 PM |
| Finally took OS Test... passed it! | jecr | A+ Certification | 0 | 06-28-2004 08:04 PM |