Nuno <> wrote in message
< .com>...
> Hi,.
Hey. You're not allowed to stand in line here twice.
> I'm having a real problem with AT&T VPN and Microsoft VPN software
> running on the same machine (not at the same time).
You have spyware.
> Here's how it goes, I would really appreciate if someone could help
> me.
It's all connected.
> 1.
1?
> I use Microsoft's VPN client to connect to our Office.
Why do you use microsoft's vpn client to connect to your office, Nuno?
> No problems here.
No. Insurance, arsehole.
> 2.
2?
> I use also AT&T's VPN client to connect to a customer's network.
Why the **** do you use also at&t's vpn client to connect to a
customer's network?
> No problems here.
No, that's not true. You're still alive.
> BUT.
But why?
> After I install AT&T software on my machine, I can't connect to my
> office VPN anymore, the client hangs on the "Verifying user name and
> password" window.
I agree, in my judgement, you cannot connect to your office vpn anymore.
> If I uninstall AT&T, I can connect again.
Your signature separator is NOT Usenet Compliant!
> I did think of installing/uninstalling as needed, but it's not a real
> solution because each time it requires a reboot.
Why do you feed the troll?
> So, what have I tried up to now: Installing the VPN client adds two
> things to my network connection properties (in the "This connection
> uses the following items" box): - AT&T VPN Client - AT&T WiFi support
> (or something like that, it's currently in a "uninstalled cycle", so I
> can't check it).
I agree, in my judgement, you cannot check it).
> I edited the MS VPN connection and unchecked those items from the
> "This connection uses the following items box", but nothing changes.
Nothing much.
> I also re-created the MS VPN connection with AT&T already installed on
> my machine, but the results are the same.
You don't have to.
> BTW: OS is Windows XP SP2 (latest updates), AT&T software is 6.
I know nothing about computers, I'm afraid.
> 5.
5?
> something (updated it this morning, but I was having the problems
> already with version 6.
Why were you having the problems already with version 6?
> 3).
3?
> TIA, Nuno.
Get ****ed in advance.
--
Duane