top posting/ bottom posting.. it's really the content that matters..
hmmm, well you know what i mean
"Maestro" <> wrote in message
news:01cc01c361ba$82a0bf50$...
I went off on a rant, but my only real point was that
there are some that prefer top posting and have their
reasons and some that prefer bottom posting and have their
reasons. Neither is right or wrong regardless of our
personal opinions. It made no sense to me to attack the
previous poster for being a top poster. No I don't read
bottom to top, but at the same time if I already know
what's been posted I don't want to have to scroll through
a bunch of old stuff to get to the new stuff. That may
not make sense to you and that's fine. Like I said we
have preferences (reasons).
As a side note though, if I had my way top posting would
be the law...
>-----Original Message-----
>"Maestro" <> wrote in message
>news:09bd01c361b2$28b21be0$...
>> Who the f*ck do you think that you are to dictate how
>> anyone post in this newsgroup.
>
>He was not dictating, he was asking.
>
>> If you don't like the way
>> they're posted, skip em.
>
>That would be fine if there was some way to know before
opening the post
>that it was top-posted. I don't see to many subject
lines with [Warning:
>Top poster] included.
>
>> Perhaps you're ass backwards!
>
>Do you read from bottom to top? Do you also read from
right to left?
>Shalom!
>
>> Some of the crap complained about in here borders on
>> ridiculous. If that's the only thing you have to worry
>> about you're living a divine life. You bottom
posting...
>> oh nevermind.
>
>We'll cross that border someday. Stay tuned.
>
>
>--
>Fris "Please, Mr. Postman" beeŽ MCNGP #13
>
>http://www.mcngp.tk
>The MCNGP Team - We're here to help
>
>.
>