Googee

I'd like to complain about Google for Orwellianizing the masses (entire world) with its Groups Beta product. DejaNews began
archiving usenet in 1995 and a lot of people raised their voices at the time for privacy. Google purchased DejaNews in 2001 and
remained the primary corporate archiver of usenet. Until 1995 usenet was archived by Universities and moderate access was given to
the public at large. A usenet forum is like a 'net hangout' on a specific topic of interest, in a way like a 'net street' where
people can subscribe and hang out. By Google archiving usenet as a whole globally, and providing unprecedented access, it is exactly
like Orwellian cameras applied to the streets of the net, a deep human rights and humanitarian violation of dignity. Not only full
privacy cannot be solved technologically with the privacy features Google applies, but a company forces a membership, a membership
nobody signed an agreement with. What Google offers to the public is a unilateral emposed uncompetitive environment, creating a
reliance to all who turn to usenet with a personal, private interest questions to have their privacy ignored molested, and if a
privacy problem develops, having to turn to customer services of a company they never signed an agreement with, humiliated, cheated,
offended. The Groups Beta product is absolutely illegal in a consumer sense. Google not only acts as a pirate with usenet, but
recently they scanned millions of books from public libraries without checking for copyrights. They expect to build a similar piracy
on the net with millions of books expecting writers to turn to a company to resolve copyright, a company they never signed an
agreement with. Google goes to the limits and criminally violates human rights.

woo

woo , wrote in message
u_gf.2$:

> I'd like to complain

That way to complaints.>>>>>>>>>>>

--
The well known spelling mistake.

"My Father had a profound influence on me, he was a lunatic"

"I shook hands with a friendly Arab. I still have my right arm to prove it"

"How long was I in the army? Five foot eleven"

woo , wrote in message u_gf.2$:
> I'd wike to compwain about Googwe fow Owwewwianizing de masses (entiwe
> wowwd) wif its Gwoups Beta pwoduct. DejaNews began awchiving usenet in
> 1995 and a wot of peopwe waised deiw voices at de time fow pwivacy. Googwe
> puwchased DejaNews in 2001 and wemained de pwimawy cowpowate awchivew of
> usenet. Untiw 1995 usenet was awchived by Univewsities and modewate access
> was given to de pubwic at wawge. A usenet fowum is wike a 'net hangout' on
> a specific topic of intewest, in a way wike a 'net stweet' whewe peopwe
> can subscwibe and hang out. By Googwe awchiving usenet as a whowe
> gwobawwy, and pwoviding unpwecedented access, it is exactwy wike Owwewwian
> camewas appwied to de stweets of de net, a deep human wights and
> humanitawian viowation of dignity. Not onwy fuww pwivacy cannot be sowved
> technowogicawwy wif de pwivacy featuwes Googwe appwies, but a company
> fowces a membewship, a membewship nobody signed an agweement wid. What
> Googwe offews to de pubwic is a uniwatewaw emposed uncompetitive
> enviwonment, cweating a wewiance to aww who tuwn to usenet wif a pewsonaw,
> pwivate intewest qwestions to have deiw pwivacy ignowed mowested, and if a
> pwivacy pwobwem devewops, having to tuwn to customew sewvices of a company
> dey nevew signed an agweement wid, humiwiated, cheated, offended. De
> Gwoups Beta pwoduct is absowutewy iwwegaw in a consumew sense. Googwe not
> onwy acts as a piwate wif usenet, but wecentwy dey scanned miwwions of
> books fwom pubwic wibwawies widout checking fow copywights. Dey expect to
> buiwd a simiwaw piwacy on de net wif miwwions of books expecting wwitews
> to tuwn to a company to wesowve copywight, a company dey nevew signed an
> agweement wid. Googwe goes to de wimits and cwiminawwy viowates human
> wights.

Very interesting.

Start psychological profiling

POSTER: woo <>

Statistics: =========== Approximate word count: 243 Punctuation: 11 full
stop(s) Punctuation: 15 comma(s) Punctuation: 0 exclamation mark(s)
[multiples not counted] Punctuation: 0 question mark(s) [multiples not
counted] Primary keywords: 5 Secondary keywords: 5

*** MANIA ALERT *** =================== woo used only basic punctuation (.,
?, !) a total of 11 times in 243 words. This person is grossly illiterate,
has a totally disorganised mind and is probably prone to have no sense of
responsibility or personal integrity whatsoever, as well as being likely to
read the personal mail and inspect the bank statements of his friends while
they are out of the house.

Performing analysis on keywords: Primary Keyword: "puwchased" Primary
Keyword: "DejaNews" Primary Keyword: "wemained" Primary Keyword: "cowpowate"
Primary Keyword: "awchivew" Secondary Keyword: "usenet" Secondary Keyword:
"peopwe" Secondary Keyword: "waised" Secondary Keyword: "voices" Secondary
Keyword: "pwivacy"

woo is predisposed to regularly go out without wearing underwear.

woo is susceptible to leave the date behind to wash the dishes if the date
is paying for the meal and the credit card is rejected.

Expect woo to walk away from problems and 'sweep them under the rug'.

Expect woo to wait for elevators even though the stairs are quicker.

Expect woo to be inclined to pursue an attractive and mature 15-year old.

woo conforms to Manic-Depressive personality disorder with Schizotypal
subtype tendencies.

woo is likely to be employed as a baker, or as an operator of the beetling
machine.

Phrases to describe woo: Drolling, beslubbering, stockinged squirrel;
decrepitating, ablutionary, toupeed hamster; hoveling, off-center, crownless
floozy.

Recommended accusations: Ill-natured; obsessed; excessively orderly and
organised.

Motivations: To be viewed as possessing knowledge. To avoid conflicts and
tension at all costs. To be viewed as possessing knowledge.

Questions and expected responses for woo: Question 1: Your friend's
boyfriend/girlfriend has a few too many drinks and invites you to check out
'the upstairs'. Would you go for it? Expected Response: Evidence of
propensity to rather see any of his former sex partners dead than in the
arms of other people.

Question 2: Do you agree with the statement 'Anyone who publicly humiliates
me will live to regret it'? Expected Response: Signs of tendency to have a
'can’t do' attitude and be lacking in inner drive.

Question 3: After reading the symptoms of a disease, do you start to think
you have the disease? Expected Response: Highly likely to use a coin to
damage the paneling of cars parked in his reserved parking spot.

End psychological profiling for woo

--
It's all in a days work - ask me another

Still suffering from Googleitis then ?.
>
"woo" <> wrote in message
news:2u_gf.2$...
> I'd like to complain about Google for Orwellianizing the masses (entire
> world) with its Groups Beta product. DejaNews began
> archiving usenet in 1995 and a lot of people raised their voices at the
> time for privacy. Google purchased DejaNews in 2001 and
> remained the primary corporate archiver of usenet. Until 1995 usenet was
> archived by Universities and moderate access was given to
> the public at large. A usenet forum is like a 'net hangout' on a specific
> topic of interest, in a way like a 'net street' where
> people can subscribe and hang out. By Google archiving usenet as a whole
> globally, and providing unprecedented access, it is exactly
> like Orwellian cameras applied to the streets of the net, a deep human
> rights and humanitarian violation of dignity. Not only full
> privacy cannot be solved technologically with the privacy features Google
> applies, but a company forces a membership, a membership
> nobody signed an agreement with. What Google offers to the public is a
> unilateral emposed uncompetitive environment, creating a
> reliance to all who turn to usenet with a personal, private interest
> questions to have their privacy ignored molested, and if a
> privacy problem develops, having to turn to customer services of a company
> they never signed an agreement with, humiliated, cheated,
> offended. The Groups Beta product is absolutely illegal in a consumer
> sense. Google not only acts as a pirate with usenet, but
> recently they scanned millions of books from public libraries without
> checking for copyrights. They expect to build a similar piracy
> on the net with millions of books expecting writers to turn to a company
> to resolve copyright, a company they never signed an
> agreement with. Google goes to the limits and criminally violates human
> rights.
>
>

> woo , wrote in message u_gf.2$:
> > I'd wike to compwain about Googwe fow Owwewwianizing de masses (entiwe
> > wowwd) wif its Gwoups Beta pwoduct. DejaNews began awchiving usenet in
> > 1995 and a wot of peopwe waised deiw voices at de time fow pwivacy. Googwe
> > puwchased DejaNews in 2001 and wemained de pwimawy cowpowate awchivew of
> > usenet. Untiw 1995 usenet was awchived by Univewsities and modewate access
> > was given to de pubwic at wawge. A usenet fowum is wike a 'net hangout' on
> > a specific topic of intewest, in a way wike a 'net stweet' whewe peopwe
> > can subscwibe and hang out. By Googwe awchiving usenet as a whowe
> > gwobawwy, and pwoviding unpwecedented access, it is exactwy wike Owwewwian
> > camewas appwied to de stweets of de net, a deep human wights and
> > humanitawian viowation of dignity. Not onwy fuww pwivacy cannot be sowved
> > technowogicawwy wif de pwivacy featuwes Googwe appwies, but a company
> > fowces a membewship, a membewship nobody signed an agweement wid. What
> > Googwe offews to de pubwic is a uniwatewaw emposed uncompetitive
> > enviwonment, cweating a wewiance to aww who tuwn to usenet wif a pewsonaw,
> > pwivate intewest qwestions to have deiw pwivacy ignowed mowested, and if a
> > pwivacy pwobwem devewops, having to tuwn to customew sewvices of a company
> > dey nevew signed an agweement wid, humiwiated, cheated, offended. De
> > Gwoups Beta pwoduct is absowutewy iwwegaw in a consumew sense. Googwe not
> > onwy acts as a piwate wif usenet, but wecentwy dey scanned miwwions of
> > books fwom pubwic wibwawies widout checking fow copywights. Dey expect to
> > buiwd a simiwaw piwacy on de net wif miwwions of books expecting wwitews
> > to tuwn to a company to wesowve copywight, a company dey nevew signed an
> > agweement wid. Googwe goes to de wimits and cwiminawwy viowates human
> > wights.
>
> Very interesting.
>
> Start psychological profiling
>
> POSTER: woo <>
>
> Statistics: =========== Approximate word count: 243 Punctuation: 11 full
> stop(s) Punctuation: 15 comma(s) Punctuation: 0 exclamation mark(s)
> [multiples not counted] Punctuation: 0 question mark(s) [multiples not
> counted] Primary keywords: 5 Secondary keywords: 5
>
> *** MANIA ALERT *** =================== woo used only basic punctuation (.,
> ?, !) a total of 11 times in 243 words. This person is grossly illiterate,
> has a totally disorganised mind and is probably prone to have no sense of
> responsibility or personal integrity whatsoever, as well as being likely to
> read the personal mail and inspect the bank statements of his friends while
> they are out of the house.
>
> Performing analysis on keywords: Primary Keyword: "puwchased" Primary
> Keyword: "DejaNews" Primary Keyword: "wemained" Primary Keyword: "cowpowate"
> Primary Keyword: "awchivew" Secondary Keyword: "usenet" Secondary Keyword:
> "peopwe" Secondary Keyword: "waised" Secondary Keyword: "voices" Secondary
> Keyword: "pwivacy"
>
> woo is predisposed to regularly go out without wearing underwear.
>
> woo is susceptible to leave the date behind to wash the dishes if the date
> is paying for the meal and the credit card is rejected.
>
> Expect woo to walk away from problems and 'sweep them under the rug'.
>
> Expect woo to wait for elevators even though the stairs are quicker.
>
> Expect woo to be inclined to pursue an attractive and mature 15-year old.
>
> woo conforms to Manic-Depressive personality disorder with Schizotypal
> subtype tendencies.
>
> woo is likely to be employed as a baker, or as an operator of the beetling
> machine.
>
> Phrases to describe woo: Drolling, beslubbering, stockinged squirrel;
> decrepitating, ablutionary, toupeed hamster; hoveling, off-center, crownless
> floozy.
>
> Recommended accusations: Ill-natured; obsessed; excessively orderly and
> organised.
>
> Motivations: To be viewed as possessing knowledge. To avoid conflicts and
> tension at all costs. To be viewed as possessing knowledge.
>
> Questions and expected responses for woo: Question 1: Your friend's
> boyfriend/girlfriend has a few too many drinks and invites you to check out
> 'the upstairs'. Would you go for it? Expected Response: Evidence of
> propensity to rather see any of his former sex partners dead than in the
> arms of other people.
>
> Question 2: Do you agree with the statement 'Anyone who publicly humiliates
> me will live to regret it'? Expected Response: Signs of tendency to have a
> 'can't do' attitude and be lacking in inner drive.
>
> Question 3: After reading the symptoms of a disease, do you start to think
> you have the disease? Expected Response: Highly likely to use a coin to
> damage the paneling of cars parked in his reserved parking spot.
>
> End psychological profiling for woo
>
> --
> It's all in a days work - ask me another

You can't deal with Googe's crimes against humanity, as a human being, rather
psycho the dealant. Do something good for humanity. Go join the communists.
Where are they to be found? In your head.

woo , wrote in message
B%gf.68$:

> namuh a sa ,ytinamuh tsniaga semirc s'egooG htiw laed t'nac uoY
> oG .ytinamuh rof doog gnihtemos oD .tnalaed eht ohcysp rehtar ,gnieb
> .daeh ruoy nI ?dnuof eb ot yeht era erehW .stsinummoc eht nioj

Eh?

--
It's all in a days work - ask me another

woo came up with the following;:
> I'd like to complain about Google

I'm sure they're mortified.

I quite like Google.

Note, FYI, the spelling is Google, not Googee.

--
Paul ...
(8(|) Homer Rules ..... Doh !!!

Paul - xxx , wrote in message
:
> woo came up with the following;:
>> I'd like to complain about Google
>
> I'm sure they're mortified.
>
> I quite like Google.
>
> Note, FYI, the spelling is Google, not Googee.

It is in the land of rice.

--
.... Trust me, I'm psychosomatic, honest.

Paul - xxx , wrote in message
:
> woo came up with the following;:
>> I'd like to complain about Google
>
> I'm sure they're mortified.
>
> I quite like Google.
>
> Note, FYI, the spelling is Google, not Googee.

It is in the land of rice.

--
.... Trust me, I'm psychosomatic, honest.

> >> I'd like to complain about Google
> >
> > I'm sure they're mortified.
> >
> > I quite like Google.

I went to school.