«

Are there software for remote control of another computer which work over
port 80 because of a firewall?

--
John Dalberg

"John Dalberg" <2> wrote in message
news:...
>
>
> Are there software for remote control of another computer which work
> over
> port 80 because of a firewall?
>
> --
> John Dalberg

John, are there software for computer with remote control which work with
a firewall because of port 80? Is this what you mean.

Alt

John Dalberg <2> wrote in
news::

>
>
> Are there software for remote control of another computer which work over
> port 80 because of a firewall?
>

Yeah, there are Remote Desktop appliactions that will work over HTTP. But
if you think a FW Admin will not spot that traffic over HTTP and know
something is up if you're trying to do this from work to home, you would be
wrong.

Duane

"John Dalberg" <2> wrote in message
news:...
>
>
> Are there software for remote control of another computer which work over
> port 80 because of a firewall?

You can change the port number of VNC, PCAnywhere and I'm pretty sure
Terminal Services as well. It's a registry hack.

Dan







.................................................. ...............
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
>>>> at http://www.TitanNews.com <<<<
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-

On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:11:43 GMT, Duane Arnold wrote:

> John Dalberg <2> wrote in
> news::
>
>>
>>
>> Are there software for remote control of another computer which work over
>> port 80 because of a firewall?
>>
>
> Yeah, there are Remote Desktop appliactions that will work over HTTP. But
> if you think a FW Admin will not spot that traffic over HTTP and know
> something is up if you're trying to do this from work to home, you would be
> wrong.

Even if the admin spots the traffic, what will be the issue?


--
John Dalberg

On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:09:53 +0100, Dan Evans wrote:

>
>
>
> "John Dalberg" <2> wrote in message
> news:...
>>
>>
>> Are there software for remote control of another computer which work over
>> port 80 because of a firewall?
>
> You can change the port number of VNC, PCAnywhere and I'm pretty sure
> Terminal Services as well. It's a registry hack.

I didn't mention that a web server is running on port 80 so that solutions
doesn't work. It has to go through a gateway. I found teamviewer.com which
might work.




--
John Dalberg

John Dalberg <2> wrote in
news:1trrqc7x9r7v5.1mcd6ap9biy36$.:

> On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:11:43 GMT, Duane Arnold wrote:
>
>> John Dalberg <2> wrote in
>> news::
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Are there software for remote control of another computer which work
>>> over port 80 because of a firewall?
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, there are Remote Desktop appliactions that will work over HTTP.
>> But if you think a FW Admin will not spot that traffic over HTTP and
>> know something is up if you're trying to do this from work to home,
>> you would be wrong.
>
> Even if the admin spots the traffic, what will be the issue?
>
>

You are compromising the company's network making contact with your home
network that has not been approved and is most likely a non secure
situation. That's the issue. The issue is that you don't have the
authority to do it or they would have given you that authority to make
that contact.

What's so important that you would risk the company's security like that
and possibly put your job in jeopardy?

I have seen employees' severely reprimanded or terminated for such
security breaches. As a matter of fact, I have seen people be terminated
for a far less security breach on the network than what you want to do.

Any FW or Network Security Admin worth his or her beans will spot your
traffic as that is their job with you using a company machine and DHCP IP
linked to the machine on the company's LAN. They know the LAN IP and the
remote WAN IP traffic is going to and coming from by looking at the logs.
And they do review those logs on a routine basis.

Duane

Any administrator that has 80 available via the internet to a users pc
should be fired..

psg

On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 06:30:36 GMT, Duane Arnold wrote:

> John Dalberg <2> wrote in
> news:1trrqc7x9r7v5.1mcd6ap9biy36$.:
>
>> On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:11:43 GMT, Duane Arnold wrote:
>>
>>> John Dalberg <2> wrote in
>>> news::
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Are there software for remote control of another computer which work
>>>> over port 80 because of a firewall?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, there are Remote Desktop appliactions that will work over HTTP.
>>> But if you think a FW Admin will not spot that traffic over HTTP and
>>> know something is up if you're trying to do this from work to home,
>>> you would be wrong.
>>
>> Even if the admin spots the traffic, what will be the issue?
>>
>>
>
> You are compromising the company's network making contact with your home
> network that has not been approved and is most likely a non secure
> situation. That's the issue. The issue is that you don't have the
> authority to do it or they would have given you that authority to make
> that contact.
>
> What's so important that you would risk the company's security like that
> and possibly put your job in jeopardy?
>
> I have seen employees' severely reprimanded or terminated for such
> security breaches. As a matter of fact, I have seen people be terminated
> for a far less security breach on the network than what you want to do.
>
> Any FW or Network Security Admin worth his or her beans will spot your
> traffic as that is their job with you using a company machine and DHCP IP
> linked to the machine on the company's LAN. They know the LAN IP and the
> remote WAN IP traffic is going to and coming from by looking at the logs.
> And they do review those logs on a routine basis.

I don't believe what you're saying is true technically. When you allow http
traffic on port 80 that's pretty safe under a browser control. You're
talking as if we are opening a direct link between two computers and bad
stuff is going to pass freely from the outside to the inside, which is not
the case. I work for a bank and we allow webex sessions from the outside to
troubleshoot issues. It's pretty safe. You have to go through a third party
gateway.

Check out totalrc.net. It's IMPOSSIBLE to do any harm to the internal
network because it's pure http traffic inside a browser with no ActiveX or
Java or anything installed in the client. Just mappged images that you
click on to do stuff on the remote server. Technically, in my opinion it's
a clever way of doing it with total security.


--
John Dalberg

On 15 Nov 2005 22:37:31 -0800, chrispsg wrote:

> Any administrator that has 80 available via the internet to a users pc
> should be fired..

Firewall admins have port 80 http open. That's the case everyone unless
they don't want users to browse. Are you saying they have it open for ALL
protocols?


--
John Dalberg