«

Hello,

I am migrating a program from Visual C++ 6 to Visual C++ 7.1.
When I run the exe file, the behavior is different because of the
qsort function.
Indeed I have some data which are identical for my comparison
function, but they aren't sorted on the same way depending on the
version of the compiler.

It is not a disastrous problem but I would like to know if there is a
way to have an identical behaviour.

Regards,

Laurent Pajou.

chamois wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am migrating a program from Visual C++ 6 to Visual C++ 7.1.
> When I run the exe file, the behavior is different because of the
> qsort function.
> Indeed I have some data which are identical for my comparison
> function, but they aren't sorted on the same way depending on the
> version of the compiler.
>
> It is not a disastrous problem but I would like to know if there is a
> way to have an identical behaviour.
>
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pajou.
>

This is OT here, probably microsoft.public.vstudio.general is better.

Anyway:

What kind of data you are sorting ?
Does the comparison routine utilize strict ordering rules
( A < B , B < C => A <C ) for every element ?

The qsort may change order of those objects having equal values.

ismo

On Feb 27, 11:46 am, "chamois" <laurentpa...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am migrating a program from Visual C++ 6 to Visual C++ 7.1.
> When I run the exe file, the behavior is different because of the
> qsort function.
> Indeed I have some data which are identical for my comparison
> function, but they aren't sorted on the same way depending on the
> version of the compiler.
This should not be a surprise to you. qsort does not specify an order
for elements that compare equal.

>
> It is not a disastrous problem but I would like to know if there is a
> way to have an identical behaviour.

Probably not if you insist on using qsort. But since you are in a C++
forum, I should mention that std::stable_sort gives a "deterministic"
sort every time. It will likely differ from your current qsort result,
but the result on the two platforms will be identical.
You really should give up qsort, by the way. It is only useful for POD
and it is likely quite a bit slower than std::sort.

/Peter

On 27 fév, 12:43, Ismo Salonen <nob...@another.invalid> wrote:
>
> This is OT here, probably microsoft.public.vstudio.general is better.
>
> Anyway:
>
> What kind of data you are sorting ?
> Does the comparison routine utilize strict ordering rules
> ( A < B , B < C => A <C ) for every element ?
>
> The qsort may change order of those objects having equal values.
>
> ismo

Ismo,

I sort pointers on objects and the rule ( A < B , B < C => A <C ) is
respected.
I think I will use std::stable_sort that Peter suggested.

Thansks,

Laurent.

"Ismo Salonen" <> wrote in message
news:SPUEh.119$...
> chamois wrote:
> This is OT here, probably microsoft.public.vstudio.general is better.


just ignore such people -- this is nobodies private news group

"chamois" <> wrote in message
news: oups.com...
> Hello,
>
> I am migrating a program from Visual C++ 6 to Visual C++ 7.1.
> When I run the exe file, the behavior is different because of the
> qsort function.
> Indeed I have some data which are identical for my comparison
> function, but they aren't sorted on the same way depending on the
> version of the compiler.
>
> It is not a disastrous problem but I would like to know if there is a
> way to have an identical behaviour.


implement your own sort or use one with deterministic behaviour.
There are other implementations of sort
-- some promise to keep to identical objects in the same order as far as I
remember.