More B.S. Making the test harder has nothing to do with "lab simulations",
any test can be compromised..any test!
You want a better indicator of ability, then make each candidate enter a
Guild, where the employer is responsible for reviewing the work and amount
of time a candidate spends working in he field. At the end of 1 year the
employer presents the candidate a letter stating that he spent at least a
year working as an operator or administrator. Then and only then could he
apply for an exam. Better yet, require that 3 - 5 current MCSE's interview
the candidate and make a recommendation as to his or her suitability to take
the test..
Microsoft only presents the test, the candidate is the one who chooses
whether or not to cheat or take a short cut. Put the blame and the burden of
proof back where it should be...on the candidate.
"Alex" <> wrote in message
news:010301c35485$d2e0fe90$...
> U r right!
>
> Showing that you can do it yourself is always the best way
> to prove your skills.
>
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >The braindumpers wouldn't be able to cheat if Microsoft
> >added a lab to the exam process.
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>I've heard that microsoft exams will be more difficult,
> >>this because all of those cheaters...
> >>
> >>Well, I think this won't help at all!
> >>It will even make it more difficult for honest people to
> >>succeed!
> >>
> >>Those cheating !$#@ will just learn another braindump...
> >>So nothing changes for cheaters.
> >>
> >>And all we (honest people) got to do is to retry exams.
> >>.
> >>
> >.
> >
|
Similar Threads
