| Home | Forums | Reviews | Guides | Newsgroups | Register | Search |
 |
| Thread Tools |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
boost:
 tr_vector<animal> vec;vec.push_back( new animal ); What does happen if push_back() fails -- do I have a leak? |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
| |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Peter wrote:
> boost: tr_vector<animal> vec;> vec.push_back( new animal ); > > What does happen if push_back() fails -- do I have a leak? Did you know that Boost has its own discussion forums? |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
| |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Peter" wrote: > boost: tr_vector<animal> vec;> vec.push_back( new animal ); > > What does happen if push_back() fails -- do I have a leak? > No leak. All Boost libraries are designed exception safe (modulo bugs). /Pavel |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 19:19:48 +0100, "Pavel Vozenilek" wrote:
>"Peter" wrote: > >> boost: tr_vector<animal> vec;>> vec.push_back( new animal ); >> >> What does happen if push_back() fails -- do I have a leak? > >No leak. > >All Boost libraries are designed exception safe (modulo bugs). To be more precise, wrt to exception-safety (as defined in http://www.boost.org/more/generic_exception_safety.html) the function provides the basic guarantee but not the strong guarantee. Best regards, Roland Pibinger |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
| |
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| difference between *ptr++ and ++*ptr ? | Jason | C Programming | 19 | 05-19-2005 04:50 PM |
| is (!ptr) or (ptr) valid way to check for NULL or NOT NULL? | G Fernandes | C Programming | 9 | 02-27-2005 03:07 AM |
| const ptr to const ptr ? | franco ziade | C Programming | 3 | 02-17-2005 04:30 AM |
| How to convert a double **ptr in a double const ** const ptr? | Heiko Vogel | C Programming | 3 | 09-14-2004 10:23 AM |
| what's the difference between delete ptr and ptr=0 -dont they accomplish the same | Sid | C++ | 5 | 07-29-2004 03:42 AM |
