«

Since there's so many people coming here telling us how their interpreted
languages are _so_ much better than C++, how about we hold them ransom
and not write their virtual machines for them?

-Tomás

"Tomas" <> wrote in message
news:RIFPf.6957$...
>
> Since there's so many people coming here telling us how their interpreted
> languages are _so_ much better than C++, how about we hold them ransom
> and not write their virtual machines for them?
>
> -Tomas

Um, ok... I guess I've done my part then, since I've never written a virtual
machine.

Better idea.. why don't we just stick to the topic here ourselves?

-Howard

Tomás skrev:
> Since there's so many people coming here telling us how their interpreted
> languages are _so_ much better than C++, how about we hold them ransom
> and not write their virtual machines for them?
>
> -Tomás

Are you for real?

--
TB @ SWEDEN

TB posted:

> Tomás skrev:
>> Since there's so many people coming here telling us how their
>> interpreted languages are _so_ much better than C++, how about we hold
>> them ransom and not write their virtual machines for them?
>>
>> -Tomás
>
> Are you for real?


Take a joke. It's okay to smile once in a while.


-Tomás

Tomás posted:

>
> Since there's so many people coming here telling us how their
> interpreted languages are _so_ much better than C++, how about we hold
> them ransom and not write their virtual machines for them?
>
> -Tomás

<snip serious responses>

I wonder if computer programmers have the worst sense of humour of all
kinds of people?

-Tomás

Tomás wrote:
> Tomás posted:
>
>>
>> Since there's so many people coming here telling us how their
>> interpreted languages are _so_ much better than C++, how about we
>> hold them ransom and not write their virtual machines for them?
>>
>> -Tomás
>
> <snip serious responses>
>
> I wonder if computer programmers have the worst sense of humour of all
> kinds of people?

Don't be so hard on yourself. It wasn't that bad of a joke.

Jeff