Go Back   Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > MCSD
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply

MCSD - Analyzing Requirements and Defining Microsoft .NET Solution Architectures

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-23-2004, 05:37 AM   #1
Default Analyzing Requirements and Defining Microsoft .NET Solution Architectures


Has anyone come across this new exam? I have read an
overview and also a sample chapter from the book, but
looks like MS is deviating (a lot) from the Rational OOAD
way. Hate to see another war on "OOAD process" now.

Any comments?


Rohit Wason
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2004, 07:26 AM   #2
Rohit Wason
 
Posts: n/a
Default Books for 70-300
....and for people who have cleared this exam, which is
better:

1) Cram 2 Book, or
2) The MS kit for 70-300?

TIA,
Rohit


Rohit Wason
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2004, 02:23 PM   #3
Wei
 
Posts: n/a
Default Books for 70-300
Cram 2 Book
>-----Original Message-----
>....and for people who have cleared this exam, which is
>better:
>
>1) Cram 2 Book, or
>2) The MS kit for 70-300?
>
>TIA,
>Rohit
>.
>



Wei
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2004, 02:40 PM   #4
Eric
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Analyzing Requirements and Defining Microsoft .NET Solution Architectures
Rohit Wason wrote:

> Has anyone come across this new exam? I have read an
> overview and also a sample chapter from the book, but
> looks like MS is deviating (a lot) from the Rational OOAD
> way. Hate to see another war on "OOAD process" now.
>
> Any comments?


Which new exam - do you mean 70-301? I think the 70-300 is still the
required test for MCSD. I think 70-301 is optional for now.

Microsoft is moving in it's own direction, and not following any
"coventional ideas". The new Team System for 2005 is radical to say the
least. It should be an interesting year.


Eric
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2004, 10:05 AM   #5
Rohit Wason
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Analyzing Requirements and Defining Microsoft .NET Solution Architectures
You're right Eric. It would be an interesting year to see.
I have read thru the "Team system" web pages, they are of
course very radical. Some of it is IMO, old wine in new
bottle

I was referring to 70-301. And I think I want to go with
70-300 first. Then if I still have interest in the subject
I can go for 301 too

Thanks


>Which new exam - do you mean 70-301? I think the 70-300

is still the
>required test for MCSD. I think 70-301 is optional for

now.
>
>Microsoft is moving in it's own direction, and not

following any
>"coventional ideas". The new Team System for 2005 is

radical to say the
>least. It should be an interesting year.




Rohit Wason
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2004, 10:49 AM   #6
The Poster Formerly Known as Kline Sphere
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Analyzing Requirements and Defining Microsoft .NET Solution Architectures
>Hate to see another war on "OOAD process" now.

lol!

Kline Sphere (Chalk) MCNGP #3


The Poster Formerly Known as Kline Sphere
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Which Certfication???????? Supriya MCTS 4 12-29-2007 05:47 PM




SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46