true, I think the surveys conducted by Microsoft would indicate that people
with around 2 years experience would fare better that people with lesser
experience. Hence the recommendation.
Regards
Vipul
"Daniel Joskovski" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Hi Zach,
> Nobody says that you must wait two years to take an exam, that is only
> recommendation deduced probably from surveys test takers do before or
> after
> exam. But I can tell you that in my case I really have around two year
> experience with the platform. I start working seriously with .NET
> somewhere
> in 2002 and I became MCSD in October 2003 so I think the time frame is
> correct.
> Regards,
> Daniel
>
> <> wrote in message
> news:0b0701c4d8b6$dccc98e0$...
>> I understand that MS recommends 2 years of experience
>> before taking exams? Is that really necessary or is that
>> a suggestion by MS that, in turn, gives employers some
>> sort of assurance that they are hiring someone with
>> knowledge AND experience?
>>
>> Personally, I am beginning to study for the exams for
>> MCSD and I don't want to wait 2 years to take em. I have
>> 5 years of development experience using other
>> technologies (LAMP platforms) but my current job is
>> 100% .NET.
>>
>> Any thoughts on this? For those that have taken the
>> exam, how much experience did you have when you took them?
>>
>> Zach
>
>
|
