|
|
|
|
12-02-2004, 09:35 PM
|
#1 |
2 years? really?
I understand that MS recommends 2 years of experience
before taking exams? Is that really necessary or is that a suggestion by MS that, in turn, gives employers some sort of assurance that they are hiring someone with knowledge AND experience? Personally, I am beginning to study for the exams for MCSD and I don't want to wait 2 years to take em. I have 5 years of development experience using other technologies (LAMP platforms) but my current job is 100% .NET. Any thoughts on this? For those that have taken the exam, how much experience did you have when you took them? Zach |
|
|
|
12-03-2004, 10:01 PM
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Re: 2 years? really?
Hi Zach,
Nobody says that you must wait two years to take an exam, that is only recommendation deduced probably from surveys test takers do before or after exam. But I can tell you that in my case I really have around two year experience with the platform. I start working seriously with .NET somewhere in 2002 and I became MCSD in October 2003 so I think the time frame is correct. Regards, Daniel <> wrote in message news:0b0701c4d8b6$dccc98e0$... > I understand that MS recommends 2 years of experience > before taking exams? Is that really necessary or is that > a suggestion by MS that, in turn, gives employers some > sort of assurance that they are hiring someone with > knowledge AND experience? > > Personally, I am beginning to study for the exams for > MCSD and I don't want to wait 2 years to take em. I have > 5 years of development experience using other > technologies (LAMP platforms) but my current job is > 100% .NET. > > Any thoughts on this? For those that have taken the > exam, how much experience did you have when you took them? > > Zach Daniel Joskovski |
|
|
|
12-05-2004, 10:32 PM
|
#3 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Re: 2 years? really?
true, I think the surveys conducted by Microsoft would indicate that people
with around 2 years experience would fare better that people with lesser experience. Hence the recommendation. Regards Vipul "Daniel Joskovski" <> wrote in message news:... > Hi Zach, > Nobody says that you must wait two years to take an exam, that is only > recommendation deduced probably from surveys test takers do before or > after > exam. But I can tell you that in my case I really have around two year > experience with the platform. I start working seriously with .NET > somewhere > in 2002 and I became MCSD in October 2003 so I think the time frame is > correct. > Regards, > Daniel > > <> wrote in message > news:0b0701c4d8b6$dccc98e0$... >> I understand that MS recommends 2 years of experience >> before taking exams? Is that really necessary or is that >> a suggestion by MS that, in turn, gives employers some >> sort of assurance that they are hiring someone with >> knowledge AND experience? >> >> Personally, I am beginning to study for the exams for >> MCSD and I don't want to wait 2 years to take em. I have >> 5 years of development experience using other >> technologies (LAMP platforms) but my current job is >> 100% .NET. >> >> Any thoughts on this? For those that have taken the >> exam, how much experience did you have when you took them? >> >> Zach > > Vipul Patel |
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Done After 9 Years of Selling on EBay | gojody | DVD Video | 5 | 03-27-2007 04:17 PM |
| w00t. Passed A+ after years of procrastination. | Rodney Stewart | A+ Certification | 2 | 11-03-2005 04:42 PM |
| Second Generation Blu-ray Products To Be Rolled Out At Year's End. | Allan | DVD Video | 0 | 03-16-2005 10:18 AM |
| Bush Voted Year's Top Film Villian | Crankkkie | DVD Video | 119 | 11-05-2004 05:45 AM |
