Oscarian said:
> On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 01:09:17 -0800, mark_bluemel wrote:
>
>> If you have to ask, you're probably not ready to do it.
>>
>
> Indeed, but I enjoy having goals, even if it is a long term goal.
>
>>> On that note, is C a "good" language to use for a web crawler?
>>
>> What do you mean by "good"? It wouldn't be my first choice. Other
>> languages probably provide more infrastructure for the job "out of the
>> box".
>
>
> "Good", as in "providing best efficiency". I guess.
Language isn't the efficiency bottleneck with Internet applications. The
Internet is!
Any language that can do the job is a good language. Sort them in order of
your preference. If you would rather write this in SNOBOL++, then write it
in SNOBOL++. If you'd rather write it in Perl, write it in Perl. If you'd
rather write it in C, write it in C. And if you'd rather write it in MS-DOS
batch script, you're a braver man than me!
Different languages exist because not everybody thinks the same way. You
have a choice. Use it. Don't let others dictate it.
--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: rjh at the above domain, - www.