Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Programming > C Programming > [alt.lang.asm,comp.lang.c]assembly Vs C Language

Reply
Thread Tools

[alt.lang.asm,comp.lang.c]assembly Vs C Language

 
 
CBFalconer
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12-07-2006
kinebud wrote:
>

.... snip ...
>
> What's your point? Many lisp programmers out there can easily cut
> the size of a C program into a half/fourth with little effort and
> naturally get it done quicker, but that doesn't mean it isn't
> "impossibly difficult" in C by any means whatsoever. (Maybe you
> just aren't that good in those other languages, perhaps?) You're
> also missing other parts of the [entire] equation, but they aren't
> addressed here so I won't bother with pointing them out.


Any _good_ C programmer can cut the size of the average C program
by similar factors. However they will also cut the size of the
executable, while the lithper is probably increasing that by a
similar factor.

I am not impressed by the mean quality of coding in any language.

--
Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
<http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
santosh
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12-07-2006
pete wrote:
> kinebud wrote:
> >
> > ¬a\/b wrote:
> > > for me is clearer and easier than all your languages, in fact i can
> > > write code in that language that in another one language is
> > > impossible
> > > to write because too difficult.

> >
> > What's your point? Many lisp programmers out there can easily cut the
> > size of a C program into a half/fourth with little
> > effort and naturally
> > get it done quicker, but that doesn't mean it isn't "impossibly
> > difficult" in C by any means whatsoever. (Maybe you just aren't that
> > good in those other languages, perhaps?) You're also missing other
> > parts of the [entire] equation, but they aren't addressed here so I
> > won't bother with pointing them out.
> >
> > > x86 assembly registers others assemblers have, are not short name
> > > enough

> >
> > Um... I fail to see how this gives you any 'tactical' advantage over
> > something like C.

>
> I think ¬a\/b is the same character
> who originally called himself "Giuseppe" in 2003,
> when he posted "The Source Code Of A Thousand Tears."
>
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...50449c04ecc796


He also goes by the name of 'RSolsCarLiola' or similar.

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Keith Thompson
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12-07-2006
"santosh" <> writes:
> pete wrote:

[...]
>> I think ¬a\/b is the same character
>> who originally called himself "Giuseppe" in 2003,
>> when he posted "The Source Code Of A Thousand Tears."
>>
>> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...50449c04ecc796

>
> He also goes by the name of 'RSolsCarLiola' or similar.


RoSsIaCrIiLoIA.

He's also posted as "av <>".

I'm not 100% certain they're the same person, but I'm reasonably sure.

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst- <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
writing a compiler for Monster language using C language Shravani C Programming 8 03-16-2008 09:36 PM
A language-agnostic language Ed Java 24 03-27-2006 08:19 PM
c is a low-level language or neither low level nor high level language pabbu C Programming 8 11-07-2005 03:05 PM
Using a Scripting Language as Your Scripting Language DaveInSidney Python 0 05-09-2005 03:13 AM
Python is the best and most popular general purpose scripting language; the universal scripting language Ron Stephens Python 23 04-12-2004 05:32 PM



Advertisments