«

mathieu wrote:
>
> I am saying that:
>
> if( s[0] < '0' || s[0] > '9'
> || s[1] < '0' || s[1] > '9'
> || s[2] < '0' || s[2] > '9' )
> {
>
> is equivalent to my previous post with the call of isdigit. But as far
> as understand it should not suffer from the unsigned char cast,
> right ?

Right.

--
pete

"mathieu" <> brokenly-Google-Grouped:

> I am saying that:
>
> if( s[0] < '0' || s[0] > '9'
> || s[1] < '0' || s[1] > '9'
> || s[2] < '0' || s[2] > '9' )
> {
>
> is equivalent to my previous post with the call of isdigit. But as far
> as understand it should not suffer from the unsigned char cast, right ?

There is no unsigned char cast in that code, so no, it doesn't suffer
from any unsigned char casts.

Richard

Sorry for that. I'll keep that in mind. I did vote for the feature
request at:

http://groups-beta.google.com/suppor..._type=features

Thx
-M

mathieu wrote:
> Sorry for that.

Sorry for what? Provide context please when quoting. There are links at
http://clc-wiki.net/wiki/Intro_to_clc to sites with instructions.

> I'll keep that in mind. I did vote for the feature
> request at:
>
> http://groups-beta.google.com/suppor..._type=features

Vote for which feature? Google being separated from Usenet so we don't
get all these context-less posts?
--
Flash Gordon, living in interesting times.
Web site - http://home.flash-gordon.me.uk/
comp.lang.c posting guidelines and intro:
http://clc-wiki.net/wiki/Intro_to_clc

Inviato da X-Privat.Org - Registrazione gratuita http://www.x-privat.org/join.php

> Vote for which feature? Google being separated from Usenet so we don't
> get all these context-less posts?

Ok I said, I apologized.
What do you do when you only have read access to the newsgroups,
google.groups is very convenient solution, not perfect yet, that's all.

"mathieu" <> writes:
> Sorry for that. I'll keep that in mind. I did vote for the feature
> request at:
>
> http://groups-beta.google.com/suppor..._type=features

I *think* you're saying you voted for the "Default quoting of previous
message in replies" feature. Thanks for that, but it's ironic that
you mention this while not using the simple workaround that lets you
do this in spite of Google's broken interface. (And in a later
followup in this thread, you quote a previous article but snip the
attribution line.)

You *have* read <http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/>, right?

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst- <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this.

And incessant whining about Google has what to do with
the programming language C?


Flash Gordon <> wrote:
# mathieu wrote:
# > Sorry for that.
#
# Sorry for what? Provide context please when quoting. There are links at
# http://clc-wiki.net/wiki/Intro_to_clc to sites with instructions.
#
# > I'll keep that in mind. I did vote for the feature
# > request at:
# >
# > http://groups-beta.google.com/suppor..._type=features
#
# Vote for which feature? Google being separated from Usenet so we don't
# get all these context-less posts?
# --
# Flash Gordon, living in interesting times.
# Web site - http://home.flash-gordon.me.uk/
# comp.lang.c posting guidelines and intro:
# http://clc-wiki.net/wiki/Intro_to_clc
#
# Inviato da X-Privat.Org - Registrazione gratuita http://www.x-privat.org/join.php
#
#

--
SM Ryan http://www.rawbw.com/~wyrmwif/
Mention something out of a Charleton Heston movie, and suddenly
everybody's a theology scholar.

SM Ryan <> writes:
> And incessant whining about Google has what to do with
> the programming language C?

It makes it possible to discuss it coherently.

I see you've decided to start top-posting. I can't say I'm surprised.

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst- <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this.

Keith Thompson wrote:

> SM Ryan <> writes:
> > And incessant whining about Google has what to do with
> > the programming language C?
>
> It makes it possible to discuss it coherently.
>
> I see you've decided to start top-posting. I can't say I'm surprised.

Trolls tend to degenerate as their current bag o' tricks gets stale. I
killfiled him long ago over past antics.



Brian

Keith Thompson wrote:
> I *think* you're saying you voted for the "Default quoting of previous
> message in replies" feature. Thanks for that, but it's ironic that
> you mention this while not using the simple workaround that lets you
> do this in spite of Google's broken interface. (And in a later
> followup in this thread, you quote a previous article but snip the
> attribution line.)

I'll make sure to keep attribution line, too. Thx

-M