«

Does anyone know how many standard functions there are in the various
standard's c99 etc?

Thanks

--
==============
*Not a pedant*
==============

pemo wrote:
> Does anyone know how many standard functions there are in the various
> standard's c99 etc?
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> ==============
> *Not a pedant*
> ==============
please make the subject more clear

pemo wrote:
> Does anyone know how many standard functions there are in the various
> standard's c99 etc?
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> ==============
> *Not a pedant*
> ==============
please make the subject more clear

srikanth wrote:
> pemo wrote:
> > Does anyone know how many standard functions there are in the various
> > standard's c99 etc?
> >
> > Thanks
>
> please make the subject more clear

There's nothing unclear with either the subject or the post.

As to how many standard functions there are, I'd suggest donwloading a
copy of the C99 draft (or buy the Standard proper) and grep it (or
count in some other way). OTH, there may be someone (close to the
Standards comitee?) who actually knows the answer already.

pemo wrote:
> Does anyone know how many standard functions there are in the various
> standard's c99 etc?
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> ==============
> *Not a pedant*
> ==============

"srikanth" <> wrote in news:1141319816.046747.228520
@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com:

>
> pemo wrote:
>> Does anyone know how many standard functions there are in the various
>> standard's c99 etc?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> --
>> ==============
>> *Not a pedant*
>> ==============
> please make the subject more clear

Repeatedly posting nonsense like this will not ensure that people read
your posts ... In fact, the exact opposite will happen.

Sinan
--
A. Sinan Unur <>
(reverse each component and remove .invalid for email address)

Vladimir S. Oka wrote:
> srikanth wrote:
>> pemo wrote:
>>> Does anyone know how many standard functions there are in the
>>> various standard's c99 etc?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>
>> please make the subject more clear
>
> There's nothing unclear with either the subject or the post.
>
> As to how many standard functions there are, I'd suggest donwloading a
> copy of the C99 draft (or buy the Standard proper) and grep it (or
> count in some other way). OTH, there may be someone (close to the
> Standards comitee?) who actually knows the answer already.

Good suggestion!

If my greping went right, I make it 397 in the c99 std - that includes
macros too btw.


--
==============
*Not a pedant*
==============

pemo wrote:
> Vladimir S. Oka wrote:
> >
> > As to how many standard functions there are, I'd suggest donwloading a
> > copy of the C99 draft (or buy the Standard proper) and grep it (or
> > count in some other way). OTH, there may be someone (close to the
> > Standards comitee?) who actually knows the answer already.
>
> Good suggestion!
>
> If my greping went right, I make it 397 in the c99 std - that includes
> macros too btw.
>
>
> --
> ==============
> *Not a pedant*
> ==============

n869 isn't accurate for such a count. I know at least
one function -- _Exit, having run across it -- that was added between
n869 and final version of the standard. But it is presumably accurate
enough for your unstated purposes...

-David

On 2006-03-02, David Resnick <> wrote:
>
> pemo wrote:
>> Vladimir S. Oka wrote:
>> >
>> > As to how many standard functions there are, I'd suggest donwloading a
>> > copy of the C99 draft (or buy the Standard proper) and grep it (or
>> > count in some other way). OTH, there may be someone (close to the
>> > Standards comitee?) who actually knows the answer already.
>>
>> Good suggestion!
>>
>> If my greping went right, I make it 397 in the c99 std - that includes
>> macros too btw.
>>
>>
>> --
>> ==============
>> *Not a pedant*
>> ==============
>
> n869 isn't accurate for such a count. I know at least
> one function -- _Exit, having run across it -- that was added between
> n869 and final version of the standard. But it is presumably accurate
> enough for your unstated purposes...

We could just call it a round 400 - might as well, if we're not counting
just functions.

pemo wrote:
>
> Does anyone know how many standard functions there are in the
> various standard's c99 etc?

Yes. Any pedant.

--
"If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use
the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
"show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
"Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson
More details at: <http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/>
Also see <http://www.safalra.com/special/googlegroupsreply/>